Polk FL Lawyers | Maxie Broome, Jr. -- eLawyers

Bankruptcy Nos. 87-604-BKC-6P7, 87-605-BKC-6P7 In Re Gainesville PH Properties, Inc. (1989)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Oct. 18, 1989 Citations: 106 B.R. 304

106 B.R. 304 (1989) In re GAINESVILLE P-H PROPERTIES, INC., Debtor. In re SOUTHERN MOTEL ASSOCIATES, LTD., Debtor. Bankruptcy Nos. 87-604-BKC-6P7, 87-605-BKC-6P7. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. October 18, 1989. Frank M. Wolff, Maitland, Fla., for debtors. Peter N. Hill, Orlando, Fla., for trustee. George E. Mills, Orlando, Fla., trustee. Samuel J. Zusmann, Orlando, Fla., for Eastgroup Properties, Inc. Richard B. Webber, Orlando, Fla., for Days Inn of America Fran..

97-4460 Southeastern Staffing v. Fl. Dept. of Ins. (1998)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 1998 Citations: 728 So. 2d 248

728 So. 2d 248 (1998) SOUTHEASTERN STAFFING SERVICES, INC., Sunshine Staff Leasing, Inc.; Jet Enterprises, d/b/a Fat Boys' Barbeque of Sebring; ADF International, Inc.; Staffing Concepts, Inc.; American Eagle Masonry; Teamstaff, Inc.; And R & J Crane Service, Inc., Assessees and Appellants, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, as Receiver of United States Employer Consumer Self Insurance Fund of Florida, and Florida Workers' Compensation Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc., Receivers and Appellee..

53658 City of Sarasota v. Mikos (1979)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 07, 1979 Citations: 374 So. 2d 458

374 So. 2d 458 (1979) CITY OF SARASOTA, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. John W. MIKOS, As Property Appraiser for Sarasota County, Florida, Appellee. No. 53658. Supreme Court of Florida. June 7, 1979. Rehearing Denied September 4, 1979. *459 William M. Hereford, of Strode, Hereford & Taylor, Sarasota, for appellant. John C. Dent, Jr., of Dent & Pflugner, Sarasota, for appellee. Ralph A. Marsicano, Gen. Counsel, Tampa, and Claude L. Mullis, Staff Atty., Tallahassee, for Florida Leag..

00-004425 MAGGIE PEARLE VINSON vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, D/B/A NORTH FLORIDA EVALUATION AND TREATMENT CENTER (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 27, 2000

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding, as stipulated at the hearing, is whether the Petitioner has been subjected to discrimination on account of a handicap or disability.Petitioner failed to show that Respondent did not reasonably accommodate her disability. She was still unable to adequately perform her duties and so had to be dismissed.

96-004143 ROSE-LENNIE DEVELOPMENTAL LEARNING CENTER vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 30, 1996

The issue in this case is whether Respondent should deny the request for an increase in licensed capacity, from 12 to 65 children, because Petitioner's septic system is inadequate for the increased capacity.Child care licensing did not delegate license authority to local health department when local health department determined that applicant`s septic system was inadequate for more students.

76-000221 BARKETT OIL COMPANY vs. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (1976)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 18, 1979

Petitioner's liability for proposed assessment of fuel tax and penalty pursuant to Chapter 206, Florida Statutes.Refund given to Petitioner after meeting burden of proof that assessment was incorrect.

78-002049 SUN-AIR CHARTER SERVICES, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (1978)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 22, 1979

Whether Respondent's proposed assessment under Chapter 212, Florida Statutes, for sales tax, penalty, and interest is valid (Notice of Proposed Assessment, dated August 15, 1978).Respondent should revise its proposed assessment to reflect only transactions occurring after Petitioner's incorporation.

78-001947 SILVER SAND COMPANY OF LEESBURG, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (1978)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 10, 1979

Tax dispute concerning the applicability of the statutes/rules to freight costs and interest/penalties. Recommended Order: oulines the construction of the tax bill.

78-000186 LOUIS E. FISCHER vs. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (1978)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 14, 1979

Petitioner liable for tax and penalty due for his purchase of a plane that cannot be classified as a sale for resale because Petitioner did not meet strict state requirements.

78-000480 GABRIEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION vs. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (1978)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 14, 1978

Whether or not the Petitioner is liable for tax, penalties and interest under the authority of Chapter 212, Florida Statutes, on certain purchases, rentals/leases and repairs to capital equipment made by the Petitioner on paging equipment, for the audit period October 1, 1974 through September 30, 1977. The audit also considers the purchase of office supplies in the aforementioned period, but for the purposes of this hearing the Petitioner is not contesting the imposition of tax, penalty and interest on those items. Furthermore, the Petitioner does not contest the mathematical calculations in arriving at the tax as set forth in the Notice of Proposed Assessment; instead, it is an attack on the right of the Respondent to affect such a tax against the Petitioner on the items in dispute.Tax due on rental/lease of capital equipment used to effect repairs even when the repairs are free. Waive penalties.

Maxie Broome, Jr.