Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Michael A Mone'
Michael A Mone'
Visitors: 53
0
Bar #607606(OH)    
Powell OH

Are you Michael A Mone'? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

93-002797  HARRY M. KATZ vs BOARD OF MEDICINE  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 21, 1993
The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Petitioner, Harry M. Katz, M.D., has demonstrated that he is capable of practicing medicine with reasonable skill and safety in the State of Florida, as required by Subsection 458.331(4), Florida Statutes (1991).Dr. showed rehab of character and demonstrated ability to practice safely. Pre-1981 revocation with no limit in FO, so could seek reinstatement.
93-001672  ASUNCION INTERIAN vs BOARD OF MEDICINE  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 01, 1993
Whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, subsequent to October 1, 1993, still has the authority to issue a physician's license pursuant to subsection (8) of Section 458.311, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992)? If so, whether Petitioner's application for licensure as a physician pursuant to subsection (8) of Section 458.311, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), should nonetheless be denied on the grounds set forth in the order of the Department of Professional Regulation (now the Department of Business and Professional Regulation and hereinafter referred to as the "Department"), Board of Medicine (hereinafter referred to as the "Board" or "Respondent"), which was signed on September 25, 1992, and filed with the Agency Clerk on October 21, 1992?Recommendation that application for license be denied where statute pursuant to which application filed, was repealed during pendency of application.
93-000464  INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION CONSULTANTS, INC. vs BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPISTS  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 28, 1993
The ultimate issue is whether International Evaluation Consultants, Inc. (International), is qualified under Rule 21MM-3.011(3), Florida Administrative Code, to evaluate the credentials of foreign graduates to determine that they have education and training which is the equivalent of a bachelor's degree in physical therapy in the United States. The factual issue is whether Roland H. Gaines, as the Registrar of Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, (Florida A&M University) possesses the requisite skills to evaluate the credentials of foreign graduates to determine whether their education and training is the equivalent of a bachelor's degree in physical therapy in the United States. The basis for determining the case is whether the Board through Rule 21MM- 3.001(3), Florida Administrative Code, can limit the persons evaluating the credentials of foreign graduates to three named corporations and the offices of the registrar of educational institutions in the United States, approved for the training of physical therapists by the American Physical Therapy Association.Rule on qualifications for persons evaluating transcripts must be construed to mean experience and not limited to registrars in absence of standards.
93-000871  SUNCOAST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. vs BOARD OF EMPLOYEE LEASING COMPANIES  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 17, 1993
The issue in this case is whether Petitioner and its controlling person are entitled to licenses as, respectively, an employee leasing company and a controlling person of an employee leasing company.Employee leasing Co. & controlling person entitled to licenses based on ade- quate disclosure of work comp premium dispute & CAAP acctng of SIH loan.
90-004799  BOARD OF TALENT AGENCIES vs JANE DANIELS, D/B/A T. J. NORRIS COMPANY, INC.  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 02, 1990
This is a license discipline case in which the Respondent has been charged by Administrative Complaint with numerous violations of Part VII of Chapter 468, Florida Statutes (1989), which are the statutory provisions regulating the talent agency business.Evidence established multiple violations of Sec. 468.402(1)(b),(s) & (t). Appropriate penalty is $400.00 fine for each count and revocation of license
90-005809  BOARD OF PHARMACY vs AHMAD ALLY AND THE MEDICINE SHOPPE  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 1990
Whether petitioner should take disciplinary action against respondent for the reasons alleged in the administrative complaint?Dispensing Tussionex without a prescription results in recommendation for suspension of pharmacist's license.
89-007036  BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC vs CLIFFORD FRUITHANDLER  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 26, 1989
The issue in this case is whether the Respondent Clifford Fruithandler's license to practice chiropractic should be disciplined for the alleged violation of Section 460.413(1)(d) as set forth in the Administrative Complaint.Use of the term ""advanced"" in ad was misleading; intent and/or reliance need not be shown
89-003868  BOARD OF PHARMACY vs CHARLES J. BESHARA  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 19, 1989
The issue in this case is whether the pharmacy license issued to the Respondent, Charles Beshara, should be revoked or otherwise disciplined based upon the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint.Respondent gave employee pain pills after prescription expired; Respondent pled nolo to criminal charge; no evidence Respondent sold illegally for profit.
90-005994  BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS vs MONRAD R. THUE  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 24, 1990
This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner seeks to take disciplinary action against the Respondent on the basis of allegations that the Respondent violated Section 471.033(1)(g), Florida Statutes, by displaying negligence in the practice of engineering, and violated Section 471.033(1)(j), Florida Statutes, by sealing a drawing which was not prepared by him or under his responsible supervision, direction, or control. The Respondent denies that there has been any violation.Evidence shows engineer exercised responsible supervision, direction, or control and was not negligent in the practice of engineering.
90-004970  BOARD OF OPTICIANRY vs DORY GOMEZ-DE ROSAS  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 09, 1990
The issue is whether the Respondent is subject to discipline for engaging in practice beyond the scope of opticianry.90 day suspension, 1 year probation and $1750 fine on optician who acted as optometrist examining eyes, writing prescription for lenses and glaucoma testing

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer