Broward FL Construction and development and Litigation Lawye -- eLawyers

19-1663 G.P., Father of L.P., A Minor Child v. Department of Children and Families (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 29, 2019

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D19-1663 _ G.P., Father of L.P., A Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Jonathan Sjostrom, Judge. October 29, 2019 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. LEWIS, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _ Ronald Newlin, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Sarah J. Rumph, Children..

04-10914 GLF Const Corp v. LAN/STV (2005)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Jun. 24, 2005 Citations: 414 F.3d 553

414 F.3d 553 GLF CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAN/STV, A Joint Venture of Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc.; STV Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-10914. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 24, 2005. Michael Albert Piscitelli, Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Robert Brooks Gilbreath (argued), Vernon Childs Howerton, Jenkens & Gilchrist, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant. James Warren Grau, Scott Allen Whisler (argued), Grau & Koen,..

05-000142PL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs RUSSELL G. WOLVEN (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 18, 2005

In relation to DOAH Case No. 05-0515, does the case involve the sale of securities as described in Chapter 517, Florida Statutes (2002), that would confer jurisdiction upon OFR to proceed to a hearing on the merits of the Administrative Complaint that forms the basis for DOAH Case No. 05-0515, and to what extent, if any, the named Respondents have been involved with the sale of securities sufficient to declare jurisdiction over their activities? Preliminary to that determination is the related issue concerning the possible pre-emption of OFR's regulatory authority by virtue of the regulatory action previously taken by the State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes (DBPR) under authority set forth in Chapter 721, Florida Statutes (2002)? Argument has also been set forth concerning the significance of court cases as they might influence OFR's ability to declare their regulatory authority in this instance.

05-000429PL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs WALTER ROLF STROHMAIER (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 07, 2005

In relation to DOAH Case No. 05-0515, does the case involve the sale of securities as described in Chapter 517, Florida Statutes (2002), that would confer jurisdiction upon OFR to proceed to a hearing on the merits of the Administrative Complaint that forms the basis for DOAH Case No. 05-0515, and to what extent, if any, the named Respondents have been involved with the sale of securities sufficient to declare jurisdiction over their activities? Preliminary to that determination is the related issue concerning the possible pre-emption of OFR's regulatory authority by virtue of the regulatory action previously taken by the State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes (DBPR) under authority set forth in Chapter 721, Florida Statutes (2002)? Argument has also been set forth concerning the significance of court cases as they might influence OFR's ability to declare their regulatory authority in this instance.

05-000515 OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION vs SCOTT W. SPOR (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 11, 2005

In relation to DOAH Case No. 05-0515, does the case involve the sale of securities as described in Chapter 517, Florida Statutes (2002), that would confer jurisdiction upon OFR to proceed to a hearing on the merits of the Administrative Complaint that forms the basis for DOAH Case No. 05-0515, and to what extent, if any, the named Respondents have been involved with the sale of securities sufficient to declare jurisdiction over their activities? Preliminary to that determination is the related issue concerning the possible pre-emption of OFR's regulatory authority by virtue of the regulatory action previously taken by the State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes (DBPR) under authority set forth in Chapter 721, Florida Statutes (2002)? Argument has also been set forth concerning the significance of court cases as they might influence OFR's ability to declare their regulatory authority in this instance.The investment contract in this case was a security allowing the regulator to proceed on the merits.

05-000569PL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs RICHARD LEE BAMMERLIN (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 15, 2005

In relation to DOAH Case No. 05-0515, does the case involve the sale of securities as described in Chapter 517, Florida Statutes (2002), that would confer jurisdiction upon OFR to proceed to a hearing on the merits of the Administrative Complaint that forms the basis for DOAH Case No. 05-0515, and to what extent, if any, the named Respondents have been involved with the sale of securities sufficient to declare jurisdiction over their activities? Preliminary to that determination is the related issue concerning the possible pre-emption of OFR's regulatory authority by virtue of the regulatory action previously taken by the State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes (DBPR) under authority set forth in Chapter 721, Florida Statutes (2002)? Argument has also been set forth concerning the significance of court cases as they might influence OFR's ability to declare their regulatory authority in this instance.

04-003169BID AMEC CIVIL, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 03, 2004

Whether the Department of Transportation’s decision to reject all bids for Financial Project No. 209278-1-52-01 (J. Turner Butler Blvd.) a major interchange in Duval County, Florida, was exercised illegally, arbitrarily, dishonestly or fraudulently.Order correcting scrivenor`s error in Recommended Order, paragraph 41.

99-004403BID YOUTHTRACK, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 18, 1999

Whether Respondent's intended award of a contract to Ramsay Youth Services, Inc., pursuant to RFP No. K8027, is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, applicable rules, or polices or the specifications of the request for proposals.Evaluator made some errors, but correction would not garner enough points to exceed points awarded to other offeror.

99-002277BID QUINN CONSTRUCTION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 1999

The issue in this proceeding is whether the proposed award of a contract to PCL Civil Contractors, Inc. ("PCL"), for the rehabilitation of the Jewfish Creek Bridge in Monroe County, Florida violates Section 120.57(3), Florida Statutes (1997). (All chapter and section references are to Florida Statutes (1997) unless otherwise stated.)Agency proposed evaluation of Petitioner`s (low bidder) good faith efforts to comply with applicable disadvantaged business enterprise goals is contrary to applicable rules and officially stated agency policies and clearly erroneous.

95-001096F MITCHELL BROTHERS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 1995

The issues are whether Petitioner Mitchell Brothers, Inc. is entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from Respondent State of Florida, Department of Transportation, under Section 120.57(1)(b)(5), Florida Statutes, and if so, in what amount.No entitlement to attorney's fee and cost. Department of Transportation justified in sending delinquency letter where delay on project contractor's fault.

Michael Albert Piscitelli