Leon FL Administrative law and Litigation Lawyers | Miguel C -- eLawyers

14-3998 Jabar M. Lockhart v. State of Florida (2015)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2015

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JABAR M. LOCKHART, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D14-3998 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed January 22, 2015. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. J. Bradford Stetson, Judge. Jabar M. Lockhart, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, ..

2D06-4944 Durant v. State (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2008 Citations: 985 So. 2d 538

985 So. 2d 538 (2008) DURANT v. STATE. No. 2D06-4944. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 11, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

5D00-679 Paszamant v. Retirement Accounts, Inc. (2001)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 02, 2001 Citations: 776 So. 2d 1049

776 So. 2d 1049 (2001) Joan PASZAMANT, etc., et al., Appellant, v. RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS, INC., etc., Appellee. No. 5D00-679. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 2, 2001. *1050 William G. Osborne of William G. Osborne, P.A., Orlando and Barry N. Greenberg of Mishan, Sloto, Greenberg, Hellinger & Udolf, P.A., Miami, for Appellant. Anthony Deglomine, III and Nichole M. Mooney of Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee. PETERSON, J. Th..

11-006495 FINR II, INC. vs CF INDUSTRIES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 2011

The issue is whether CF Industries, Inc. (CF), has provided reasonable assurance that its proposed mining and reclamation of the South Pasture Extension (SPE) mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that complies with applicable statutes and rules so that an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), SPE conceptual reclamation plan (CRP), South Pasture Wetland Resource Permit (WRP) Modification, and South Pasture Conceptual Reclamation Plan Modification should be issued by the Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, & WRP modifications to conduct phosphate mining and reclamation activities in Hardee County approved.

08-004193GM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs CITY OF JACKSONVILLE (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 25, 2008

The issue is whether the City of Jacksonville's (City's) amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), also known as Ordinance No. 2007-355-E, and a related text amendment to Conservation/Coastal Management Element Policy 7.3.1 adopted by Ordinance No. 2008-315-E are in compliance. Amendment to FLUM not in compliance; text amendment changing definition of Coastal High Hazard Area in compliance.

09-002928RX BERNARD MONTGOMERY MYERS vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 28, 2009

The issues in this case are the validity of Florida Administrative Code Rules 18-14.003(4) and 18-21.004(1)(g)-(h) and (7)(i),1 and an alleged unadopted rule prohibiting fish cleaning stations over sovereign submerged land (SSL); and Petitioner's claim to an award of attorney's fees and costs under Section 120.595(3)-(4), Florida Statutes.2Rules for managing state lands were within statutory authority; no agency statements required to be adopted as rules.

06-000881GM DIANE BROWN AND PANHANDLE CITIZENS COALITION vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 2006

The issues in this case are whether Amendments 05-02B, 05- 02C, 05-02G, and 05-02H to the Bay County Comprehensive Plan ("Plan") are “in compliance” as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.2Sanctions under 57.105 awarded in the amount of $250, plus interest.

05-002361GM DON AND PAMELA ASHLEY vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND FRANKLIN COUNTY (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 01, 2005

Whether the amendments to the Franklin County (County) Comprehensive Plan (Plan) adopted by Ordinance No. 2005-20 (Amendments) on April 5, 2005, are “in compliance” as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.1Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the Franklin Plan revision with no capital improvement element, the incorrect Coastal High Hazard Area, and the incorrect affordable housing information was not "in compliance."

05-002730GM SIERRA CLUB, INC., AND PANHANDLE CITIZENS COALITION, INC. vs FRANKLIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2005

Whether the amendments to the Franklin County (County) Comprehensive Plan (Plan) adopted by Ordinance No. 2005-20 (Amendments) on April 5, 2005, are “in compliance” as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.1Petitioner failed to prove inconsistency with minimum criteria beyond fair debate on two issues remanded by the District Court of Appeal.

Miguel Collazo III