Palm Beach FL Civil rights, Constitutional and Environmental -- eLawyers

14-001026GM PIETER BAKKER AND SHIRLEY BAKKER vs THE TOWN OF SURFSIDE (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 07, 2014

The issue is whether Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 10.6 and Map FLU-8 adopted by the Town of Surfside (Town) by Ordinance No. 14-1613 on February 11, 2014, are in compliance.Petitioners failed to demonstrate beyond fair debate that plan amendments allowing a religious institution on adjacent property were not in compliance.

04-002755RP FLORIDA KEYS CITIZENS COALITION, INC., AND LAST STAND, INC. vs FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2004

Whether the proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 28-20.110, 28-20.120, and 28-18.210 are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.The challenged portions of the proposed rules pertaining to the Comprehensive Plans of Monroe County and the City of Marathon are not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.

04-002756RP FLORIDA KEYS CITIZENS COALITION, INC., AND LAST STAND, INC. vs FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION AND MONROE COUNTY (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2004

Whether the proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 28-20.110, 28-20.120, and 28-18.210 are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.The challenged portions of the proposed rules pertaining to the Comprehensive Plans of Monroe County and the City of Marathon are not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.

01-002409GM CHARLES ROSSIGNOL vs ISLAMORADA, VILLAGE OF ISLANDS AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 2001

The issue is whether Islamorada Ordinance 01-05, which amended Policy 1-2.4.7 of Islamorada's comprehensive plan, is in compliance, as provided by Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes.Plan provision adopting transient rental restrictions in residential areas and plan amendment relaxing conditions under which temporary grandfathering provision may be lost are supported by data and analysis in preserving neighborhoods and communities.

96-006138GM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF BROWARD COUNTY, INC. vs BROWARD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (NO. 068732762) (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 31, 1996

The issue in these cases is whether amendments to the Broward County Comprehensive Plan are "in compliance" as defined in Section 163.3184(1), Florida Statutes.Petitioners proved plan amendment to require public schools concurrency was not in compliance.

Nancy Ellen Stroud

14-001026GM PIETER BAKKER AND SHIRLEY BAKKER vs THE TOWN OF SURFSIDE (2014)

04-002755RP FLORIDA KEYS CITIZENS COALITION, INC., AND LAST STAND, INC. vs FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA (2004)

04-002756RP FLORIDA KEYS CITIZENS COALITION, INC., AND LAST STAND, INC. vs FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION AND MONROE COUNTY (2004)

01-002409GM CHARLES ROSSIGNOL vs ISLAMORADA, VILLAGE OF ISLANDS AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2001)

96-006138GM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF BROWARD COUNTY, INC. vs BROWARD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (NO. 068732762) (1996)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.