Leon FL Lawyers | Paige Billings Shoemaker -- eLawyers

Paige Billings Shoemaker

Visitors: 58

Bar #143022(FL) License for 26 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you Paige Billings Shoemaker? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.2015, 69L-6.012, 69L-6.015, 69L-6.019, 69L-6.021, 69L-6.027, 69L-6.028, 69L-6.030, 69L-6.031

1D09-1875 LEE COUNTY SCHOOL DIST. v. Gadson (2009)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 02, 2009 Citations: 22 So. 3d 73

22 So. 3d 73 (2009) LEE COUNTY SCHOOL DIST. v. GADSON. No. 1D09-1875. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. November 2, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.

4D08-2470 HARRIELL v. State (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 24, 2010 Citations: 29 So. 3d 372

29 So. 3d 372 (2010) Eugene HARRIELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D08-2470. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 24, 2010. Rehearing Denied April 7, 2010. *373 Philip J. Massa, Regional Counsel, and Genevieve Hall, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. ..

2D08-3422 Russ v. State (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2010 Citations: 36 So. 3d 931

36 So. 3d 931 (2010) Shawn Dewitt RUSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D08-3422. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 11, 2010. *932 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. KELLY, Judge. Shawn Dewitt Russ pleaded nolo contendere to robbery with a deadly weapon (count one) and re..

11-005070 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs DOOR DEPOT OF PALM BEACH, INC. (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2011

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated chapter 440, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Chapter 69L-6, by failing to maintain workers' compensation coverage for its employees, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent, a construction contractor, violated chapter 440, Florida Statutes, and Petitioner's rules, by failing to secure workers' compensation coverage for its subcontractors.

10-010012 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs DEREK EYRE (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 02, 2010

The issues are whether Respondent failed to provide workers' compensation insurance coverage and/or an exemption as required by law, as set forth in the second Amended Order of Penalty Assessment dated March 11, 2011, and, if so, what penalty, if any, should be assessed against him.Clear and convincing evidence showed sole proprietor with expired exemption and uninsured employee failed to have required workers' compensation insurance; the evidence supported a part but not all of the assessed penalty.

09-005284 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs JEFFERY G. HELMS (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 28, 2009

The issue in this case is whether Respondent failed to properly maintain workers' compensation insurance coverage for his employees, and, if so, what penalty should be assessed.Petitioner did not meet its burden of proof in this matter. The Stop Work Order and Penalty Assessment should be dismissed.

09-006776 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs RICK'S AIR CONDITIONING, INC. (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 2009

The issue is whether Respondent is liable for a penalty of $4,741.76 for the alleged failure to maintain workers’ compensation insurance for its employees in violation of Chapter 440, Florida Statutes (2008).1Respondent, who allowed exemptions to lapse for corporate officers and failed to maintain coverage for one employee, owes $4,741.76.

09-006215 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs RIVERA CONSTRUCTION OF NORTH FLORIDA, LLC (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 12, 2009

The issues are whether Respondent failed to secure the payment of workers' compensation insurance, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner presented clear and convincing evidence that Respondent failed to secure the payment of workers' compensation as required by Chapter 440, Florida Statutes.

09-004681 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs TAMMY YZAGUIRRE (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2009

The issue in this case is whether the Stop-Work Order and Order of Penalty Assessment previously imposed against Yzaguirre Enterprises, Inc., was properly applied to Respondent as a successor-in-interest to Yzaguirre Enterprises, Inc.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent was a successor-in-interest to the corporation.

09-004057 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs THE GARDNER GROUP, INC. (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 2009

At issue in this proceeding is whether the Respondent, The Gardner Group, Inc. (Gardner Group) failed to abide by the coverage requirements of the Workers' Compensation Law, Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, by not obtaining workers' compensation insurance for its employees; and whether the Petitioner properly assessed a penalty against the Respondent pursuant to Section 440.107, Florida Statutes.Petitioner demonstrated that Respondent, a non-construction business, had four or more employees and failed to provide workers' compensation coverage, justifying imposition of a penalty.