welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Patricia Alan Renovitch
Patricia Alan Renovitch
Patricia Alan Renovitch
Visitors: 49
0
Bar #194220(FL)     License for 49 years; Member in Good Standing
Crawfordville FL

Are you Patricia Alan Renovitch? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

05-001609  MELLITA A. LANE vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 04, 2005
The issues in this case are whether IP is entitled to issuance of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number FL0002526-001/001-IW1S ("the proposed permit"), Consent Order No. 04-1202, Authorization for Experimental Use of Wetlands Order No. 04-1442, and Waiver Order No. 04-0730 (collectively, "the Department authorizations"), which would authorize IP to discharge treated industrial wastewater from its paper mill in Cantonment, Escambia County, Florida, into wetlands which flow to Elevenmile Creek and Perdido Bay.Recommend denial of a proposed permit, exemption, waiver, and consent order pertaining to the paper mill`s effluent discharge for failing to provide reasonable assurance that it would comply with all applicable statutes and rules.
04-003133CON  UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 02, 2004
The issue is whether BayCare Long Term Acute Care Hospital, Inc.'s Certificate of Need Application No. 9753 and University Community Hospital's Certificate of Need Application No. 9754, both submitted to the Agency for Health Care Administration, should be approved.Two hospital systems sought to establish long-term acute care hospitals in Respondent`s District 5. Need was established for both under Section 408.035, Florida Statutes.
04-003156CON  BAYCARE LONG TERM ACUTE CARE, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 02, 2004
The issue is whether BayCare Long Term Acute Care Hospital, Inc.'s Certificate of Need Application No. 9753 and University Community Hospital's Certificate of Need Application No. 9754, both submitted to the Agency for Health Care Administration, should be approved.Two hospital systems sought to establish long-term acute care hospitals in Respondent`s District 5. Need was established for both under Section 408.035, Florida Statutes.
04-003157CON  UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND BAYCARE LONG TERM ACUTE CARE, INC.  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 02, 2004
The issue is whether BayCare Long Term Acute Care Hospital, Inc.'s Certificate of Need Application No. 9753 and University Community Hospital's Certificate of Need Application No. 9754, both submitted to the Agency for Health Care Administration, should be approved.Two hospital systems sought to establish long-term acute care hospitals in Respondent`s District 5. Need was established for both under Section 408.035, Florida Statutes.
03-002486CON  SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL-PALM BEACH, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 09, 2003
Kindred Hospitals East, LLC ("Kindred") and Select Specialty Hospital-Palm Beach, Inc. ("Select-Palm Beach"), filed applications for Certificates of Need ("CONs") with the Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA" or the "Agency") seeking approval for the establishment of long-term care hospitals ("LTCHs") in Palm Beach County, AHCA District 9. Select-Palm Beach's application, CON No. 9661, seeks approval for the establishment of a 60-bed freestanding LTCH in "east central" Palm Beach County about 20 miles south of Kindred's planned location. Kindred's application, CON No. 9662, seeks approval for the establishment of a 70-bed LTCH in the "north central" portion of the county. The ultimate issue in this case is whether either or both applications should be approved by the Agency.Two applciants for long-term care hospital Certificates of Need proved that there is a need for 130 long-term care hospital beds in the Agency for Health Care Administration District 9. Recommend that the applications be granted.
03-002854CON  KINDRED HOSPITAL EAST, LLC vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL - PALM BEACH, INC.  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 04, 2003
Kindred Hospitals East, LLC ("Kindred") and Select Specialty Hospital-Palm Beach, Inc. ("Select-Palm Beach"), filed applications for Certificates of Need ("CONs") with the Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA" or the "Agency") seeking approval for the establishment of long-term care hospitals ("LTCHs") in Palm Beach County, AHCA District 9. Select-Palm Beach's application, CON No. 9661, seeks approval for the establishment of a 60-bed freestanding LTCH in "east central" Palm Beach County about 20 miles south of Kindred's planned location. Kindred's application, CON No. 9662, seeks approval for the establishment of a 70-bed LTCH in the "north central" portion of the county. The ultimate issue in this case is whether either or both applications should be approved by the Agency.Two applciants for long-term care hospital Certificates of Need proved that there is a need for 130 long-term care hospital beds in the Agency for Health Care Administration District 9. Recommend that the applications be granted.
02-003252  RICHARD BARNETT AND STEPHEN HANLON vs DANIEL G. WENTZ, DORIS WENTZ, AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2002
The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Respondents, the permit applicants, Daniel and Doris Wentz, are entitled to a Coastal Construction Control Line Permit allowing them to build a single-family home seaward of the coastal construction control line on Cape San Blas in Gulf County, Florida.Applicant/Respondent failed to show that artificial dune would be protective of upland property and thus a Coastal Permit could not be granted.
01-001490  JACQUELINE M. LANE vs INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 2001
The first issue is whether Petitioner, Jacqueline M. Lane (Lane) has standing. The second issue is whether International Paper Company (IP) provided reasonable assurances it has the ability to meet the conditions of the existing industrial wastewater permit for the wastewater treatment facility at the paper mill in Cantonment, Florida, pursuant to Rule 62- 620.340(3), Florida Administrative Code. A final issue is whether Lane litigated this matter for an improper purpose.International Paper Company provided reasonable assurances of its ability to comply with existing industrial wastewater treatment facility permit and related documents which justified transfer of permit.
97-000692  JOYCE (JOY) E. TOWLES CUMMINGS vs BUCKEYE FLORIDA, L.P., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 10, 1997
Whether Respondent Buckeye Florida L.P., (Buckeye), has provided reasonable assurances to Respondent Department of Environmental Protection (Department) that construction activity for the proposed project will comply with applicable provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and related administrative rules.Petitions should be dismissed for lack of standing and lack of verified petitions.
94-005635  ELISA L. SCOTT vs VILLAGE INN  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 07, 1994
Did Respondent engage in unlawful employment practices directed to Petitioner, as defined in Section 760.10(1), Florida Statutes? In particular, did Respondent knowingly maintain a sexually-hostile and abusive environment for its female servers which unreasonably interfered with their work, exposing the female employees to disadvantageous working conditions to which male employees were not exposed? Was the work place for female servers permeated with discriminatory ridicule and insults? Did Respondent maintain an intimidating environment which caused Petitioner's constructive discharge? Is Petitioner entitled to take up her former duties as a server at Respondent's restaurant? Has Petitioner sustained damages, including loss of back and future pay and related benefits?While petitioner was subject to harassment, the nature of that treatment did not constitute sexual discrimination.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer