Broward FL Lawyers | Richard Joseph Grosso -- eLawyers

19-12507 Sherwood G DuBose and Sharon A DuBose (1984)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 1984 Citations: 39 B.R. 7

39 B.R. 7 (1984) In re GENERAL COFFEE CORP., Domino Investments, Ltd., Alberto Duque, Colombian Coffee Co. Inc., Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 83-00889-BKC-TCB, 83-00902-BKC-TCB, 83-00903-BKC-TCB and 83-00904-BKC-TCB. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. March 8, 1984. David Levine, Miami, Fla., for debtors. Leonard H. Gilbert, John Olson, Tampa, Fla., for Creditors' Committee Colombian Coffee. John R. Camp, Jr., Miami, Fla., for Creditors' Committee Alberto Duque. Alan G. Greer, Miami, Fla.,..

17-23847 Kenneth D. Shapiro (1984)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Jun. 21, 1984 Citations: 41 B.R. 235

41 B.R. 235 (1984) In re TOP SPORT DISTRIBUTORS, INC. f/k/a Top Sports Distributors, Inc., a Florida corporation, Debtor. Herbert S. FREEHLING, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Alvin GARSON and Bruce T. Davis, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 83-00138-BKC-SMW, Adv. No. 84-0025-BKC-SMW-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. June 21, 1984. *236 Howard J. Berlin, Miami, Fla., for defendants. William C. Stalions, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for trustee, plaintiff. *237 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SI..

94-7240-CIV-GONZALEZ Johnson v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla. (1995)

District Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 1995 Citations: 903 F. Supp. 1520

903 F. Supp. 1520 (1995) Herbert JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA, a Florida municipal corporation, James Sparr, Rick Earle, Dennis Sheehan, Keith Allen and Ron Pritchard, in their individual capacities, Defendants. No. 94-7240-CIV-GONZALEZ. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. September 20, 1995. *1521 Scott Walter Rothstein, Michael A. Pancier, Kusnick & Rothstein, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for plaintiff. Gordon Dean Rogers and Frank Howard Henry, Muller, Mintz, K..

18-24052 Barry Reiman (2008)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Dec. 19, 2008 Citations: 398 B.R. 708

398 B.R. 708 (2008) In re CONTINUUM CARE SERVICES, INC., d/b/a The Family, Debtor. No. 07-10749-BKC-JKO. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division. December 19, 2008. *710 Amy D. Harris, Esq., Charles A. Postler, Esq., Edward J. Peterson III, Richard C. Prosser, Esq., Tampa, Fl, for Debtor. Bart Alan Houston, Esq., David Marshall Brown, Esq., Mariaelena Gayo-Guitian, Esq., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Petitioning Creditor. Heidi A. Feinman, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Mia..

15-004332FC DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY vs MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE AND 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC. (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2015

The issue to be determined in this case is the amount of reasonable attorney’s fees to be paid to the Department of Economic Opportunity (“DEO”) by Respondents.The Department of Economic Opportunity's reasonable attorney's fees on the appeal are $1,800.

04-002755RP FLORIDA KEYS CITIZENS COALITION, INC., AND LAST STAND, INC. vs FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2004

Whether the proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 28-20.110, 28-20.120, and 28-18.210 are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.The challenged portions of the proposed rules pertaining to the Comprehensive Plans of Monroe County and the City of Marathon are not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.

04-002756RP FLORIDA KEYS CITIZENS COALITION, INC., AND LAST STAND, INC. vs FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION AND MONROE COUNTY (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2004

Whether the proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 28-20.110, 28-20.120, and 28-18.210 are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.The challenged portions of the proposed rules pertaining to the Comprehensive Plans of Monroe County and the City of Marathon are not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.

08-003614GM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs MIAMI-DADE COUNTY (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 2008

The issue in this case is whether the amendments to Miami- Dade County’s Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP), adopted through Ordinance Nos. 08-44 and 08-45, are “in compliance” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008).1The County`s adoption of Ordinance 08-44 (Lowe`s Amendment) is not in compliance. The County`s adoption of Ordinance No. 08-45 is in compliance.

06-004544GM 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC.; AND ROSA DURANDO vs PALM BEACH COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 2006

The issues in this case are whether the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan amendments which changed the future land use designations for a 97.55-acre parcel and a 26.23-acre parcel through the adoption, respectively, of Ordinance 2006-28 and Ordinance 2006-29, are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2007).1Two amendments to the Future Land Use Map of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan are not in compliance with state law because they create internal inconsistancies.

04-004492GM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, JUPITER FARMS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INC., D/B/A LOXAHATCHEE RIVER COALITION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF THE EVERGLADES AND MARIA WISE-MILLER vs PALM BEACH COUNTY (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 17, 2004

The issue in this case is whether amendments to the Palm Beach County (County) Comprehensive Plan (Plan) adopted by Ordinance Nos. 2004-34 through 2004-39, 2004-63 and 2004-64 (Amendments) to accommodate the County's development of a biotechnology research park on 1,900 acres known as the Mecca site are "in compliance," as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.1It was at least fairly debatable that the Plan Amendments to accommodate the County`s Scripps project were "in compliance."

Richard Joseph Grosso