Miami-Dade FL and Criminal defense Lawyers | Sean Michael E -- eLawyers

Sean Michael Ellsworth

Visitors: 91

Bar #39845(FL) License for 31 years

Miami Beach FL

Are you Sean Michael Ellsworth? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.54, 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 194.171, 20.165, 20.197, 20.43, 381.0261, 390.011, 390.014, 393.067, 395.003, 408.813, 409.901, 409.902, 409.907, 409.913, 409.920, 415.101, 415.102, 429.01, 429.02, 429.04, 429.07, 429.14, 429.19, 429.23, 429.28, 440.13, 456.004, 456.013, 456.057, 456.061, 456.0635, 456.072, 456.073, 456.079, 456.50, 458.301, 458.305, 458.309, 458.319, 458.320, 458.327, 458.331, 458.351, 459.005, 460.413, 465.003, 465.014, 465.016, 465.023, 465.025, 465.0276, 466.024, 466.028, 499.003, 499.005, 499.006, 499.007, 57.105, 57.111, 627.4085, 627.736, 627.8405, 766.102, 810.02, 812.014, 817.234, 893.02, 893.03, 893.04, 893.07, 90.301, 90.801, 90.802, 90.803, 90.804, 95.011

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.217, 64B8-8.001, 64B8-8.0011, 64B8-9.003, 64B8-9.009, 64B8-9.0091, 64B8-9.0092

19-006010FL AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES vs RIVERO GROUP HOME, OWNED AND OPERATED BY RIVERO GROUP HOME NO. 6, INC. (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 12, 2019

Whether Respondent's renewal facilities licensure application for a group home contained a falsified fire inspection report, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty?APD failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Rivero knowingly submitted a false fire inspection report. Recommend granting renewal license application.

07-003511PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ANTHONY BRIGNONI, M.D. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 2007

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsection 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002),1 and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent did not violate standard-of-care when he did not specify the strength of acetic acid to be used in surgery.

06-002825PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs PETER N. BRAWN, M.D. (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 04, 2006

The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Peter N. Brawn, M.D., committed violations of Chapter 458, Florida Statutes (2001), as alleged in an Administrative Complaint filed by Petitioner, the Department of Health, on November 23, 2005, in DOH Case Number 2002-12896, as amended; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against his license to practice medicine in the State of Florida.Respondent violated the requirements imposed on him as a dispensing practitioner.

16-006924F HAYDEE ARANDA, D.D.S. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 22, 2016

The issues are whether attorney’s fees and costs should be awarded to the Petitioner (Petitioner or Dr. Aranda) under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2016),1/ and, if so, the amount of the fees and costs.Petitioner was a dentist who successfully defended a DOH administrative complaint and sought fees under 57.105. FO: not proven DOH knew or should have known that DOH's claim of deceptive and untrue representations was not supported by the necessary facts.

15-006268PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs HAYDEE ARANDA, D.D.S. (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 09, 2015

The issue in this case is whether the Board of Dentistry should discipline the Respondent on charges set out in an Amended Administrative Complaint filed by the Petitioner.DOH charged dentist with deceptive, untrue and fraudulent representations in dental records and delegating non-delegable tasks. The charges were not proven by clear and convincing evidence.

13-000595PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs NEELAM TANEJA UPPAL, M.D. (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 18, 2013

Whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(m), (q), and (t), Florida Statutes (2007-2011), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear & convincing evidence that Respondent violated 458.331(l) (m), (q) & (t). Recommended 6 months suspension, followed by 2 years probation, CME in record keeping & professional responsibility & ethics, $10,000. admin fine & costs.

14-000514PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs NEELAM T. UPPAL, M.D (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 2014

Petitioner proved by clear & convincing evidence that Respondent violated 458.331(l) (m), (q) & (t). Recommended 6 months suspension, followed by 2 years probation, CME in record keeping & professional responsibility & ethics, $10,000. admin fine & costs.

14-000515PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs NEELAM T. UPPAL, M.D (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 2014

13-001205PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JAMES ALEXANDER COCORES, M.D. (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 2013

Whether, in treating a single patient, who was actually an undercover law enforcement agent, Respondent, a medical doctor, violated sections 458.331(1)(m), (q), and (t), Florida Statutes; if so, whether (and what) disciplinary measures should be taken against Respondent's license to practice medicine.Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated section 458.331(m) and (t), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint.

12-000358PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs OSCAR RAMIREZ, M.D. (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 2012

The issues in this case are whether Respondent, whose license to practice medicine was revoked in Maryland on a malpractice charge, is guilty in Florida of the offense of being disciplined in another jurisdiction; and if so, whether Petitioner should impose discipline on Respondent's medical license within the applicable penalty guidelines or take some other action.Respondent, whose license to practice medicine was revoked in Maryland on a malpractice charge, is guilty in Florida of the offense of being disciplined in another jurisdiction, but the penalty should be reduced based on mitigating circumstances.