Pinellas FL and Litigation Lawyers | Stephen Overstreet Col -- eLawyers

Stephen Overstreet Cole

Visitors: 26

727-444-1415

Bar #198250(FL) License for 50 years

Clearwater FL

Are you Stephen Overstreet Cole? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Bankruptcy No. 84-89, Adv. No. 85-195 Matter of Moody & Newton, Inc. (1987)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Feb. 09, 1987 Citations: 71 B.R. 55

71 B.R. 55 (1987) In the Matter of MOODY & NEWTON, INC., Debtor(s). MOODY & NEWTON, INC., Plaintiff, v. SUN BANK/SUNCOAST, N.A., f/k/a Flagship Bank of Pinellas, N.A., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 84-89, Adv. No. 85-195. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. February 9, 1987. *56 David L. Schrader, St. Petersburg, Fla., for plaintiff. Ginnie Van Kesteren, St. Petersburg, Fla., for defendant. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Ch..

03-001500 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF LAWRENCE H. DIMMITT, III, AND LAWRENCE H. DIMMITT, JR., AS TRUSTEE vs PINELLAS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 28, 2003

The issue is whether a proposed amendment to the Pinellas County Countywide Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) changing the land use designation on a 22.18-acre parcel located at 2301 Chautauqua Avenue in the City of Clearwater (City) from Residential Suburban/Preservation to Residential Low/Preservation should be approved.City plan amendment adversely impacted adjoining County land by changing character of the neighborhood and was therefore inconsistent with County plan; amendment denied.

01-000272 YPAPANTI AND SEVASTI ALEXIOU/FRENCHY`S RESTAURANT vs CITY OF CLEARWATER AND ANTONIOS MARKOPOULOS (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 19, 2001

The issue is whether Petitioners' application for site plan approval for a proposed renovation and addition to their restaurant should be approved.Applicant qualified as an infill project for redevelopment; flexibility in off-street parking requirements justified; applicant approved.

89-005042F JAY H. MILLER AND DYNAMIC REALTY, INC., T/A DYNAMIC COMMERCIAL GROUP vs FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 17, 1989

Whether or not Petitioners are entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs.Whether petitoners are entitled to an attorney's fee and costs award.

88-002983 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION vs. JOHN F. MCCAIN (1988)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 24, 1989

Whether the Respondents are guilty of fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, false promises, false pretenses, dishonest dealing by trick, scheme, or device, culpable negligence, or breach of trust, in a business transaction in violation of subsections 475.25(1)(b),(d) and (k), Florida Statutes, by virtue of the sale of the Wal-Mar Motel by Montver, Inc., to Derek and Lucy Lea.Whether respondent's engaged in dishonesty and fraud in a real-estate business transaction.

87-003847 DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs. SCARLETT P. FAULK, STANLEY MAC PHILLIPS, AND SCARLETT FAULK & ASSOCIATES, INC. (1987)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 26, 1988

In transaction where respondent's brother got a contract to purchase realty and then sold contract to 3rd party no evidence of fraud.