Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Thomas Francis Panza
Thomas Francis Panza
Visitors: 80
0
Bar #138551(FL)     License for 54 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Thomas Francis Panza? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-000112CON  KENDALL HEALTHCARE GROUP, LTD., D/B/A KENDALL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER vs THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, D/B/A JACKSON HOSPITAL WEST; AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2016
Whether, on balance, Certificate of Need (“CON”) application number 10395 by The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida (“JW”) to build a 100-bed acute care hospital in Miami- Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, and/or CON application number 10394 by East Florida-DMC, Inc. (“DMC”), to build an 80- bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, satisfy the applicable criteria and should be approved.The evidence supported a need for a new hospital to be located in Doral, Miami-Dade County. On balance, East Florida-DMC better satisfied the applicable criteria and should be awarded CON 10394 to construct 80-bed hospital on its site in Doral.
16-000113CON  VARIETY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, D/B/A NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, D/B/A JACKSON HOSPITAL WEST  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2016
Whether, on balance, Certificate of Need (“CON”) application number 10395 by The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida (“JW”) to build a 100-bed acute care hospital in Miami- Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, and/or CON application number 10394 by East Florida-DMC, Inc. (“DMC”), to build an 80- bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, satisfy the applicable criteria and should be approved.The evidence supported a need for a new hospital to be located in Doral, Miami-Dade County. On balance, East Florida-DMC better satisfied the applicable criteria and should be awarded CON 10394 to construct 80-bed hospital on its site in Doral.
16-000114CON  CGH HOSPITAL, LTD., D/B/A CORAL GABLES HOSPITAL; TENENT HIALEAH HEALTHSYSTEM, INC., D/B/A HIALEAH HOSPITAL; AND LIFEMARK HOSPITALS, INC., D/B/A PALMETTO GENERAL HOSPITAL vs THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, D/B/A JACKSON HOSPITAL WEST AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2016
Whether, on balance, Certificate of Need (“CON”) application number 10395 by The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida (“JW”) to build a 100-bed acute care hospital in Miami- Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, and/or CON application number 10394 by East Florida-DMC, Inc. (“DMC”), to build an 80- bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, satisfy the applicable criteria and should be approved.The evidence supported a need for a new hospital to be located in Doral, Miami-Dade County. On balance, East Florida-DMC better satisfied the applicable criteria and should be awarded CON 10394 to construct 80-bed hospital on its site in Doral.
16-001695CON  VARIETY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, D/B/A NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 24, 2016
Whether there is need for a new Pediatric Heart Transplant program in Organ Transplant Service Area (OTSA), 4 and, if so, whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10421, filed by Variety Children’s Hospital, d/b/a Nicklaus Children’s Hospital (NCH,) to establish a Pediatric Heart Transplant program, satisfies the applicable statutory and rule review criteria for award of a CON to establish a Pediatric Heart Transplant program at NCH.Nicklaus Children's Hospital established the need for its proposed pediatric heart transplant program in OTSA 4.
15-006204RP  THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 04, 2015
Does Petitioner, The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida (Health Trust), have standing to challenge Department of Health (Department) proposed rules 64J-2.007, 64J-2.008, and 64J-2.009? Is proposed rule 64J-2.007 an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority? Is proposed rule 64J-2.008 an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority? Is proposed rule 64J-2.009 an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?Trauma center certification applicant did not have standing to challenge rules for creating trauma agencies that coordinate trauma systems. Alleged injury was speculative and not immediate.
15-003171  THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, D/B/A JACKSON SOUTH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 02, 2015
The issue for determination is whether Petitioner is in substantial compliance with the requirements in section 395.4025, Florida Statutes, and, therefore, has the critical elements required for a trauma center, so that Respondent must find Petitioner's Level II Trauma Center Application acceptable for approval, which would make Petitioner eligible to operate as a provisional trauma center.Petitioner is in substantial compliance with the requirements in section 395.4025 and, therefore, has the critical elements required for a trauma center, so Respondent should approve Petitioner to operate as a provisional trauma center.
14-005036RX  BISCAYNE BAY PILOTS, INC.; PORT EVERGLADES PILOTS, INC., D/B/A PORT EVERGLADES PILOTS ASSOCIATION; AND THE FLORIDA STATE PILOTS' ASSOCIATION, INC., D/B/A FLORIDA HARBOR PILOTS ASSOCIATION vs BOARD OF PILOT COMMISSIONERS, PILOTAGE RATE REVIEW COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 23, 2014
The issue is whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G14-22.012 is an invalid exercise of legislatively delegated authority in violation of section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2014).Rule 61G14-22.012 constitutes an invalid exercise of legislative authority within the meaning of section 120.52(8)(b), (c), (e), and the flush left provision.
06-001541BID  BARTON PROTECTIVE SERVICES, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 28, 2006
Whether the protest of Barton Protective Services, LLC (Barton) challenging the Department of Transportation's (Department's) announced intention to commence negotiations with Faneuil, Inc. (Faneuil), "the firm ranked number one by the Selection Committee," for the contract advertised in ITN-DOT- 05/06-8007-EH "to provide Revenue Collection Services by staffing Department operated toll facilities" on the Florida Turnpike, should be sustained.Petitioner protester failed to show that the ranking of vendors replying to an Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) was contrary to statute, rule, policy or the ITN`s specifications.
05-003144BID  UNISYS CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 30, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the intent to award a contract by the Department of Children and Family Services (DCF) or (Department) for programming and programming analysis support services for the Florida Online Recipient Integrated Data Access System (the Florida System) to Intervenor, Deloitte Consulting LLP (Deloitte), is in accordance with the governing statutes, rules, and policies applicable to the Department's procurement, and to the specifications in the Request for Proposals (RFP). It must also be determined whether the decision by DCF to disqualify the Petitioner, Unisys Corporation (Unisys), for allegedly being unresponsive to the specifications and terms of the RFP in a material way, is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner failed to show a proposal sufficiently responsive to the Request for Proposal specs to be deemed responsive. Therefore, Petitioner could not have standing to attack the responsiveness of the other two vendors whom Respondent found responsive.
91-005705  BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI, INC. vs HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF TALLAHASSEE  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 04, 1991
Whether the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services should issue certificates of need, in District 11, for the addition of 33 comprehensive medical rehabilitation beds to West Gables Rehabilitation Hospital, and/or for the establishment of a 45-bed comprehensive medical rehabilitation hospital to HealthSouth Rehabilitation Corporation.Conversion from skilled nursing facility to comprehensive medical rehabilitation beds when skilled nursing facility already provided rehab services; need from not normal payor trends, and demand for accredited brain program.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer