Leon FL Appeals, Constitutional and Government Lawyers

Timothy E. Dennis

Visitors: 125

Bar #575410(FL) License for 23 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you Timothy E. Dennis? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Laws: 1.01, 1.02, 119.07, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 120.80, 125.01, 125.0104, 161.053, 163.3164, 163.3167, 163.3174, 163.3177, 163.3178, 163.3180, 163.3181, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163.3191, 163.3245, 187.101, 187.201, 196.012, 196.199, 20.06, 20.21, 201.01, 201.02, 202.35, 211.13, 212.02, 212.03, 212.031, 212.05, 212.0515, 212.054, 212.055, 212.06, 212.07, 212.08, 212.096, 212.11, 212.12, 212.14, 212.15, 212.17, 212.18, 213.05, 213.053, 213.06, 213.21, 213.23, 213.34, 213.345, 213.67, 213.69, 213.692, 213.755, 215.26, 215.75, 220.181, 220.23, 243.77, 288.703, 290.004, 290.0065, 310.151, 314.07, 335.065, 380.05, 380.0552, 381.028, 395.3025, 408.051, 455.227, 456.001, 456.076, 468.4315, 468.433, 468.436, 468.603, 468.606, 468.607, 468.609, 501.122, 553.72, 553.73, 553.88, 553.898, 561.29, 57.105, 609.01, 624.50921, 7.06, 7.21, 72.011, 765.401, 766.104, 8.02, 944.09, 945.10, 945.25, 95.091

Florida Administrative Code: 12-24.003, 12A-1.044, 33-401.701, 61G19-6.0035, 61G19-6.016, 9J-5.003, 9J-5.005, 9J-5.0055, 9J-5.006

94-1189, 94-1191, 94-1546 and 94-1753 Dept. of Health & Rehab. Serv. v. St. (1995)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 02, 1995 Citations: 655 So. 2d 227

655 So. 2d 227 (1995) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 94-1189, 94-1191, 94-1546 and 94-1753. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 2, 1995. *228 James A. Sawyer, Jr., Orlando, for appellant Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services. Anita Langley, Orlando, for appellant Dept. of Juvenile Justice. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for a..

04-002755RP FLORIDA KEYS CITIZENS COALITION, INC., AND LAST STAND, INC. vs FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2004

Whether the proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 28-20.110, 28-20.120, and 28-18.210 are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.The challenged portions of the proposed rules pertaining to the Comprehensive Plans of Monroe County and the City of Marathon are not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.

04-002756RP FLORIDA KEYS CITIZENS COALITION, INC., AND LAST STAND, INC. vs FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION AND MONROE COUNTY (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2004

11-002802 JORGE RAMOS vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2011

Whether the Petitioner is liable for documentary stamp taxes and interest to the Respondent totaling $80,405.54, plus additional interest accruing from the date of the assessment, as reflected in the Notice of Proposed Assessment dated January 24, 2011.Warranty Deed transfer is change in ownership because there was no consideration or purchaser. Therefore, documentary stamp taxes are not owed.

10-002335 ACL BAHAMAS LIMITED AND INDIAN RIVER TERMINAL, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, PILOTAGE RATE REVIEW COMMITTEE (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 27, 2010

Whether the application of the Fort Pierce Pilots Association for an increase in the pilotage rates for the Port of Fort Pierce should be granted in whole or in part, or denied.There was not sufficient credible and persuasive evidence presented at hearing to support findings of fact materially different from the findings of the Board in its Notice of Intent.

09-003176 JAY DOUGLAS ABEL vs FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ADMINISTRATORS AND INSPECTORS BOARD (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 2009

The issue is whether Petitioner's applications for licensure should be granted or denied.The preponderance of the evidence established that Petitioner met the statutory work experience requirement for certification.

09-002312RP DELLA CHRISTIE vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 2009

Whether Petitioner has the requisite standing to challenge the subject Proposed Rule. Whether Proposed Rule 33-401.701, published in the Florida Administrative Weekly on March 6, 2009, and subsequently amended on May 29, 2009, and June 19, 2009, constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority pursuant to the provisions of Sections 120.56(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (2009).1The Proposed Rule's provision requring documentation without further guidance was vague. The remaining provisions are valid.

09-001335 SPRAGUE OWINGS vs BUILDING CODE ADMINISTRATORS AND INSPECTORS BOARD (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 13, 2009

The issue is whether Petitioner’s application for certification as a roofing inspector should be granted.Petitioner's application for certification as a roofing inspector should be denied because he does not have the required four years of full-time roofing experience.

01-002097 ELEANOR B. HUMPHRIES AND CHARLES S. HUMPHRIES vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2001

The issue is whether, pursuant to Section 161.053, Florida Statutes, and Rule 62B-33.005, Florida Administrative Code, Petitioners are entitled to a coastal construction control line permit to build a single-family residence in Volusia County with a structural elevation of 19 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum, not 24 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum, as required by Respondent.Applicants for coastal permit failed to prove that structural elevation of 19 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum, rather than 24 feet proposed by Respondent, would not adversely affect significant dune, given its prevailing elevations.

02-003897GM MANASOTA-88, INC. AND GLENN COMPTON vs SARASOTA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 03, 2002

The issue is whether a Sarasota County plan amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 2001-76 on July 10, 2002, is in compliance.Numerous changes to the text of the County Comprehensive Plan were all fairly debatable and thus in compliance.