Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Valory Toni Greenfield
Valory Toni Greenfield
Visitors: 31
0
Bar #202584(FL)     License for 49 years; Member in Good Standing
Plantation FL

Are you Valory Toni Greenfield? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.52120.53120.54120.56120.68414.0252414.41414.45

Florida Administrative Code: 65A-1.90065A-4.220

SC14-211  The Florida Bar Re: Advisory Opinion – Medicaid Planning Activities by Nonlawyers  (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 15, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC14-211 _ THE FLORIDA BAR RE: ADVISORY OPINION— MEDICAID PLANNING ACTIVITIES BY NONLAWYERS. [January 15, 2015] PER CURIAM. Pursuant to Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 10-9.1, the Florida Bar Elder Law Section’s Unlicensed Practice of Law Subcommittee petitioned the Florida Bar’s Standing Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law (Standing Committee) for an advisory opinion on whether it constitutes the unlicensed practice of law for a nonlawyer to engage in the f..
08-001577RP  CARRIE JOHNSON, AS LAWFUL CUSTODIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF MINOR CHILD, JEVON EVENS vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 28, 2008
Whether proposed rule 65A-1.900(2)(a) of Respondent is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority because the proposed rule is arbitrary and capricious and/or it enlarges, modifies, or contravenes Section 414.41, Florida Statutes, the specific provision of law implemented.The proposed rule is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority; operative cut-off date of 10/01/07 for repayment of public assistance benefit overpayment is not arbitrary and does not contravene statute.
08-003106RP  CARRIE JOHNSON, AS LAWFUL CUSTODIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF MINOR CHILD JEVON EVANS vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 25, 2008
Whether the Notice of Change to proposed rule 65A-1.900(2)(a) of Respondent is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, under Subsection 120.56(1)(c), Florida Statutes, because the proposed rule is arbitrary and capricious and because Respondent has failed to follow rulemaking procedure or requirements in attempting to change its proposed rule.It is not improper to remove a sentence from a proposed rule through use of a Notice of Change. The proposed change is not arbitrary.
93-002623RU  ALEXIA MOLINA, YOLANDA GONZALEZ, YANARI GONZALEZ vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 13, 1993
The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondent, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (Department/HRS), has a policy, not yet promulgated as a rule, of failing to follow allegedly binding judicial precedent (called henceforth the "non-acquiescence rule").Petitioners failed to show similar situated to appellants in court decision HRS accused of failing to follow as an unpromulgated policy-Even if so, HRS shown to be complying
86-001230RX  LORISNA PIERRE, DIEULA ST HILAIRE, AND ST. HELENE JOIMELUS vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 09, 1986
Consistent with the Notice of Hearing dated April 21, 1986, and the subsequent Order granting a continuance dated April 25, 1986, copies of both of which were forwarded to the parties herein, a hearing was held in this case before Arnold H. Pollock a Hearing Officer with the Division of Administrative Hearings, in Tallahassee, Florida on June 6, 1986. The issue for consideration was whether Respondent's Policy Statement 85-131 and paragraphs 10-12 and 10-18 of Respondent's Manual Number 165-6 constitute improperly promulgated rules which are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority. APPEARANCES For the Petitioner: Charlene Visconti, Esquire Valory Greenfield, Esquire Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc. 1393 Southwest 1st, Suite 330Manual and policy statement re: food stamp certification is a rule which must be properly adopted. If not, as here, it is invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer