Leon FL Appeals, Litigation and Real Property Lawyers

16-1661 Tabraue III v. Doctors Hospital (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 2019

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 27, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D16-1661 Lower Tribunal No. 14-2006 _ Guillermo Tabraue III, Esq., etc., Appellant, vs. Doctors Hospital, Inc., et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Eric William Hendon, Judge. Silva & Silva, P.A., and Jorge E. Silva; Creed & Gowdy, P.A., and Bryan S. Gowdy (Jacksonville), for appellant. Wicker Smith O’Hara McC..

17-1636 Hernandez v. State (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 29, 2018

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 29, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D17-1636 Lower Tribunal No. 14-22651 _ Landon Hernandez, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Diane V. Ward, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest..

18-2205 Michael Harry Sarder v. Major Jeff Cloutier, Director, Alachua County Department of the Jail (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 01, 2018

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-2205 _ MICHAEL HARRY SARDER, Petitioner, v. MAJOR JEFF CLOUTIER, Director, Alachua County Department of the Jail, Respondent. _ Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction. August 1, 2018 PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moot. WETHERELL, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _ Stacy A. Sc..

18-0719 Joseph Simmons v. State of Florida (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 2018

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-0719 _ JOSEPH SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Robert R. Wheeler, Judge. June 13, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _ Joseph Simmons, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 2

18-0487 JOSHUA J. DENNIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2018

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOSHUA J. DENNIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-487 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _) Opinion filed June 20, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Hall v. State, 160 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d D..

16-0784 Timothy Sneed v. Department of Corrections (2017)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2017

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA TIMOTHY SNEED, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-0784 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. _/ Opinion filed February 7, 2017. Petition for Writ of Certiorari - Original Jurisdiction. Timothy Sneed, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; William W. Gwaltney and Lateasha L. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respon..

4D12-757 Aaron Michael Smith v. State (2015)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 28, 2015

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT AARON MICHAEL SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D12-0757 [January 28, 2015] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Charles E. Burton, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2010CF010031CMB. Michael R. Hanrahan of Michael R. Hanrahan, PA, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, fo..

2006-5093 Ace Constructors, Inc. v. United States (2007)

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Filed: Sep. 19, 2007 Citations: 499 F.3d 1357

499 F.3d 1357 (2007) ACE CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2006-5093. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 19, 2007. *1358 *1359 W. Robert Vezina, III, Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli, P.A., of Tallahassee, FL, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Timothy P.McIlmail, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brie..

18-001781BID HARRIS CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 2018

The issue to determine in this bid protest matter is whether Respondent’s (Department of Management Services’), intended award of the Statewide Law Enforcement Radio Communications System to Intervenor, Motorola Solutions, Inc., was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioner had standing to initiate the bid protest. However, Petitioner failed to prove that the Department's intended award to Intervenor was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications.

19-000126BID SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 07, 2019

Whether Respondent’s intended decision to award a contract to Intervenor, Global Tel*Link Corporation (GTL), for telecommunication services pursuant to an “INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE FOR INMATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FDC ITN-17-122” (the ITN), is contrary to Respondent’s governing statutes, its rules, or the ITN specifications; and, if so, whether it was contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner failed to prove Respondent acted contrary to its governing statutes, rules or policies, and did not demonstrate the ITN process was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest or fradulent.

W Robert Vezina III