WA Lawyers | Wayne Mitchell -- eLawyers

18-002776PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, REGULATORY COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MANAGERS vs JAMES MICHAEL ROSSI (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2018

Whether Respondent, James Michael Rossi, violated section 468.436(2)(b)2., Florida Statutes (2015),1/ as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.The Department did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent failed to maintain association records or fulfill his duties to the association in good faith.

11-004506PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs RICHARD MOFFETT, DMD (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 06, 2011

The issues to be determined are whether Respondent committed a violation of section 466.028(1)(x), Florida Statutes (2002-2004)1/, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated the standard of care with respect to his care and treatment of C.M. Recommend dismissal of Amended Administrative Complaint.

07-000974PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs JENNY DAVENPORT, DDS (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2007

Should discipline be imposed against Respondent's license to practice dentistry for violation of Section 466.028(1)(x), Florida Statutes (2004)?Respondent was guilty of incompetence or negligence in performing a root canal.

11-005793PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs JOSEPH GAETA, D.D.S. (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 10, 2011

The issues in this case are whether Respondent, a dentist, failed to maintain adequate records regarding his treatment of patient R.S. and/or provided R.S. dental care that fell below minimum standards of performance, as Petitioner alleges. If Respondent committed any of these offenses, it will be necessary to determine an appropriate penalty.Respondent failed to maintain adequate dental records regarding his treatment of a patient by failing to record type and dosage of anesthetic drug used. Dental care rendered was not shown to fall below minimum standards of performance.

11-002030PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs ALEXANDER GAUKHMAN, D.D.S. (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2011

The issues in this case are whether the allegations set forth in the Administrative Complaint filed by the Department of Health (Petitioner) against Alexander Gaukhman, D.D.S. (Respondent), are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent failed to maintain record justifying the course of treatment.

07-001746PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs JEFFREY SIEGEL, D.D.S. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 2007

The issues are whether Respondent is guilty of failing to practice dentistry in accordance with the applicable standard of performance and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent departed from the applicable standard of performance in the preparation of crowns with defective distal margins because he had not finished the work, even though he permanently cemented them.

03-001584PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENISTRY vs MARIA A. KASHLAK, D.D.S. (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 2003

Whether Respondent violated Subsections 456.057(4) and 466.028(1)(n), Florida Statutes, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Dentist failed to provide dental records to patient as required by Section 466.028, Florida Statutes.

Wayne Mitchell