welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. William Holmes Congdon, Jr.
William Holmes Congdon, Jr.
William Holmes Congdon, Jr.
Visitors: 37
0
Bar #283606(FL)     License for 46 years
Palatka FL

Are you William Holmes Congdon, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

08-001316  ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, INC., CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, AND ST. JOHNS COUNTY vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 17, 2008
The primary issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District, or SJRWMD) should issue consumptive use permit (CUP) 95581 to Seminole County (Seminole) authorizing the withdrawal and use of 2,007.5 million gallons a year (mgy) or 5.5 million gallons a day (mgd) of surface water from the St. Johns River for public supply and reclaimed water supply augmentation.Applicant did not prove entitlement under Sections 57.105 and 120.595, Florida Statutes.
08-001317  CITY OF JACKSONVILLE vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 17, 2008
The primary issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District, or SJRWMD) should issue consumptive use permit (CUP) 95581 to Seminole County (Seminole) authorizing the withdrawal and use of 2,007.5 million gallons a year (mgy) or 5.5 million gallons a day (mgd) of surface water from the St. Johns River for public supply and reclaimed water supply augmentation.Applicant did not prove entitlement under Sections 57.105 and 120.595, Florida Statutes.
08-001318  ST. JOHNS COUNTY vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 17, 2008
The primary issue in this case is whether the St. Johns River Water Management District (District, or SJRWMD) should issue consumptive use permit (CUP) 95581 to Seminole County (Seminole) authorizing the withdrawal and use of 2,007.5 million gallons a year (mgy) or 5.5 million gallons a day (mgd) of surface water from the St. Johns River for public supply and reclaimed water supply augmentation.Applicant did not prove entitlement under Sections 57.105 and 120.595, Florida Statutes.
08-004201  CITY OF GROVELAND AND LAKE COUNTY vs NIAGARA BOTTLING COMPANY, LLC, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 2008
The issue in this case is whether Niagara Bottling Company, LLC (Niagara), is entitled to Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) No. 114010 issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District (District), which authorizes Niagara to withdraw and use 484,000 gallons per day (gpd) of groundwater to produce bottled water at a facility in Lake County.Niagara demonstrated that it was entitled to the comsumptive water use permit. In consumptive use permitting under Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, the public interest inquiry is limited to matters affecting the water resources.
03-001881  BOBBY C. BILLIE AND SHANNON LARSEN vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND MARSHALL CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 21, 2003
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether an environmental resource permit (number 4-109-0216-ERP) (the ERP) should be modified to allow construction and operation of a surface water management system (the project) for a residential development known as EV-1, in a manner consistent with the standards for issuance of ERPs in accordance with Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302.Respondent established reasonable assurances that storm water, water quality and wildlife-related standards of the statutes and rules would be met through the mitigation plan. Pet. established standing on some issues but did not meet burden of proof.
91-000750  NORTH FLORIDA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., AND ERON W. CARVER vs OLCOTT DAIRY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 1991
The ultimate issue is whether Olcott Dairy is exempt from permitting requirements regarding treatment and disposal of wastewater from its dairy operation. If it is not exempt, the remaining issue is whether Olcott Dairy must apply for a wastewater treatment and disposal permit from the Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) in order to continue operation.DER mistake of law. Estoppel doesn't apply. Third party challenge to exemption.
86-000818  SALLIE P. GIBSON vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 27, 1987
Reasonable assurances not given. Cumulative impacts. Contrary to public interests.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer