Leon FL Lawyers | Willis Ferrell Melvin, Jr. -- eLawyers

97-10499 Texas Commerce Bank v. State of Florida (1998)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Apr. 09, 1998 Citations: 138 F.3d 179

138 F.3d 179 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA; and Florida Department of Insurance, as Receiver for Western Star Insurance Company, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-10499. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 9, 1998. Roger B. Cowie, Kirte Matheu Kinser, Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaBoon, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Willis Ferrell Melvin, Jr., Tallahassee, FL, for State of Florida. William J. VanDercreek, W. Scott New..

15-003496MPI AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LEELAND ER SVCS PARTNERSHIP (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 18, 2015

The following are the issues presented: Whether Respondent, Leeland ER SVCS Partnership (“Leeland”), is liable to the Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA”) for Medicaid overpayments in the amount of $12,377.17, during the audit period of March 1, 2009, through August 31, 2011; Whether Leeland should be required to pay an administrative fine of $2,475.43, pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59G-9.070(7)(e); and Whether Leeland is liable to AHCA for the agency’s investigative, legal, and expert witness costs pursuant to section 409.913(23)(a), Florida Statutes.Agency for Health Care Administration proved by a preponderance of the evidence the sufficiency of its statistical sampling method and the overpayments made to Petitioner.

08-002084RP FLORIDA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION NOT FOR PROFIT, AND FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF HOMES AND SERVICES FOR THE AGING, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION NOT FOR PROFIT vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 2008

Whether proposed Rule 59G-6.0102 is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority pursuant to Section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes,1/ for the reasons described by Petitioners in their Petition.The allegations are not appropriate in the context of a facial attack on the proposed rule. Notwithstanding, the rule is valid on its face.

06-004148MPI AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs RODOLFO DUMENIGO, M.D. (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 25, 2006

Whether the Petitioner, Agency for Health Care Administration (Petitioner or Agency), is entitled to a Medicaid reimbursement and, if so, in what amount.Respondent may not bill Medicaid for services rendered by another physician unless a second doctor listed with the group performs the services.

94-002220 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs JOHN EDWARD GONZALEZ (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 21, 1994

The issue in this case is whether the Department of Insurance should discipline the Respondent for alleged violations of provisions of the Insurance Code governing agents.Agent followed Metlife marketing scheme that misrepresented whole life insurance as retirement savings account. Petitioner is guilty of misrepresentation; 6 months suspension.

94-000999 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs WAYNE HARLAND CREASY (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 25, 1994

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondent violated various provisions of the Florida Insurance Code, as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty, if any, is warranted.Petitioner proved he did not sell policies in Florida for non-Florida licensed Company with any deceptive, fraudulent intent. Therefore, only guilty of above statute charge.

92-004474 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs PAULA MARIA LETTERA (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 1992

The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether Respondent required a service charge in the amount of $20 in connection with a bail bond and, if so, what, if any, disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license.Limited surety agent (bail bondsman) who charged separate service fee of $20 should have license suspended for 90 days.

92-002274 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs SHERYL ANN SATTERFIELD (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 1992

Whether Respondent violated various provisions of the Insurance Code, specifically Sections 626.561(1), 626.611, 626.621 and 626.9521, Florida Statutes, which warrants that Respondent's licenses as an insurance agent should be disciplined.Insurance agent guilty of conversion for failure to return unearned commissions and returned premiums to insureds; Revocation

91-000723 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs DAVID WESLEY EBY (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 04, 1991

Whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the administrative complaint and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken.Insurance license suspended where agent failed to make restitution within time ordered by commissioner to resolve prior case against agent.

89-006248 RANDALL PETERSEN vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 15, 1989

The issues in this proceeding are 1) whether Petitioner's insurance agent licenses should be disciplined for alleged violations of Section 626, Florida Statutes, and, 2) whether Petitioner's application for a resident license as a life and health agent should be approved.Insurance license-evidence insufficient to establish fraud, misuse of funds, untrustworthiness, or lack of skill.

Willis Ferrell Melvin, Jr.