950 So. 2d 433 (2007) Bruce SHELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D06-1043. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 26, 2007. Rehearing Denied March 14, 2007. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Christopher Sinclair Quarles, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PLEUS, C.J. After careful review of the record, we conc..

361 So. 2d 438 (1978) Leroy RITCHEY and Dorothy Ritchey, Appellants, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Appellee. No. 78-40. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 19, 1978. Rehearing Denied August 10, 1978. William H. Shields and Michael A. Gennaro, of Pavese, Shields, Garner, Haverfield & Kluttz, Fort Myers, for appellants. Gerald W. Pierce, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appellee. RYDER, Judge. Appellants Leroy a..

951 So. 2d 1001 (2007) INSTRUMENTACION, LTDA., Appellant, v. PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 3D06-3098. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 21, 2007. *1002 Rasco Reininger Perez Esquenazi & Vigil and Steve Reininger, Coral Gables, for appellant. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and Robert Brochin, Miami, for appellee. Before COPE, C.J., and SUAREZ and LAGOA, JJ. SUAREZ, J. Instrumentacion, Ltda. ("Instrumentacion") appeals an order denying its motion to ..

432 So. 2d 792 (1983) ANGORA ENTERPRISES, Appellant, v. CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF LAKESIDE VILLAGE, INC., etc., Bleemer Levine & Associates, Etc., et al., Appellees. No. 82-180. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 15, 1983. *793 Bradford J. Beilly and Joseph J. Huss of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant. H. Adams Weaver of Johnston, Sasser, Randolph & Weaver, West Palm Beach, for appellee-Superior Sprinkler Systems, Inc. HURL..

The issues in this case are whether the Florida Real Property and Casualty Joint Underwriting Association (FRPCJUA) failed to comply with applicable requirements and standards of Part I of Chapter 627, Florida Statutes, when it utilized a request for proposals (RFP) in autumn 1995 to arrive at its decision in early 1996 to contract with Intervenors, Audubon Insurance Company (Audubon), AIB Holdings, Inc. (AIB), and American International Insurance Company (AIIC), but not with the Petitioner, Bankers Insurance Company (Bankers), for insurance policy servicing work through the year 1999. Specifically, Bankers asserts: (1) that FRPCJUA improperly gave policy servicing work to AIB, which is not a licensed insurance company; that FRPCJUA violated Chapter 287, Florida Statutes, regarding competitive bidding requirements for state agencies; that, regardless whether Chapter 287 is applicable, whether FRPCJUA acted arbitrarily and in bad faith instead of using procedures equivalent to the procedures found in Chapter 287, Florida Statutes; and (4) that FRPCJUA violated the Government in the Sunshine Law, Chapter 286, Florida Statutes. The Respondent, the Department of Insurance (the Department), and the Intervenors oppose Bankers' assertions. After initially seeking maintenance of the status quo or a contract on the same terms as the others, Bankers now seeks money damages from FRPCJUA, including attorney fees and costs.RO: Chap. 287, FS, didn't apply; JUA actions weren't arbitrary or capricious; claims for money damages were estopped and waived; there were no "Sunshine Law" (SL) violations; and there was no jurisdiction to award money damages and attorney fees under SL.

Respondent can't avoid tax by removing notes on loans for personal property to foreign jurisdiction. Possession not required. Recommend assess tax.

Whether the Petitioner, Louise Motes, waived her right to in-line of duty death benefits provided in Chapter 121, Florida Statutes.Petitioner is not entitled to line-of-duty death benefits. Petitioner should have known to go by the statute.

Validity of assessment of documentary stamp tax and penalty against petitioners pursuant to Chapter 201, F.S. At the hearing, upon stipulation of the parties, F & P Enterprises, Inc., was dismissed as a party. The parties entered into a partial stipulation of facts which was accepted by the Hearing Officer (Petitioner's Exhibit 1).Transfer of realty is not liable for documentary stamp tax where it was for nominal consideration not subject to mortgage/debt.