A trademark protects words, names, symbols, or devices that identify a specific product for consumers. For example, Kleenex® is a trademarked company name. Other tissue makers, like Puffs®, cannot use the word Kleenex in their products, even though many people refer to all tissues as “Kleenex.” When someone uses your trademark without your consent, you will need the services of a trademark infringement lawyer. Trademark infringement attorneys know which options and procedures will get the desired outcome for your case (whether it's destroying the competing product, stopping the continued misuse of your trademark, or compensation for the money the infringer earned from your trademark). Trademark infringement attorneys can also defend your use of materials if someone claims you have infringed on their trademarked materials.
4 Defenses to Trademark Infringement
Trademarks exist in order to allow consumers to differentiate products and services that exist in a marketplace. When a business, other entity, or individual, puts time, money, and effort, into developing a valid trademark, the law provides certain protections for the trademark holder.
For instance, when trademarks look similar, or have the potential to confuse the public or consumers, a trademark infringement action can be brought against the infringing party. If the infringing party has profited off the use of the infringed-upon trademark, or has harmed the goodwill associated with the trademark, the amount of damages claimed can increase drastically. However, not all trademarks that appear to be similar or infringing will be found so under the law. There are several defenses to trademark infringement actions.
A common factor in the defenses against infringement requires showing that there is no possibility of confusion for consumers. Generally this can be done by showing the actual trademarks are sufficiently dissimilar, or the parties using the marks are in different markets geographically and industries.
Mark Does Not Infringe
In many trademark infringement cases, the marks being litigated are not exactly the same, but only similar. In these cases, a defendant can assert a defense that the trademark is not actually similar enough to cause confusion. Alternatively, some trademarks do not qualify for protection if they are too general, or do not meet the necessary criteria to be a valid trademark. Proving a mark cannot qualify as a trademark is a potentially solid defense.
The product or service behind the mark, in some scenarios, will matter. For example, if a cosmetics company and a tire maker both have the same name, it is unlikely that consumers would confuse the two products or assume they are made by the same company. However, this distinction may not be as effective a defense if the products are more closely related, or one company manufactures a wide array of products.
The physical location of where the products or services are sold or provided can actually make a significant difference. If each entity using a similar trademark only operates within their own limited geographical region, and the parties are in different regions, this could potentially serve as a defense.
401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1400, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Bar #497509(FL) License for 2001 years Member in Good Standing