Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES vs ENNIS AND SHARON CLEMENTS, 00-001952 (2000)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 00-001952 Visitors: 26
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Respondent: ENNIS AND SHARON CLEMENTS
Judges: DON W. DAVIS
Agency: Department of Children and Family Services
Locations: Jacksonville, Florida
Filed: May 10, 2000
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, November 13, 2000.

Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2000
Summary: The issue is whether Ennis and Sharon Clements (Respondents) committed the violations set forth in correspondence of the Department of Children and Family Services (Petitioner); and, if so what penalty should be imposed with regard to Respondents' Foster Care License?Corporal punishment administered to foster child violates licensure regulation and suffices as basis for revocation of foster care license.
00-1952.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

FAMILY SERVICES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 00-1952

)

ENNIS AND SHARON CLEMENTS, )

)

Respondents. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


On September 26, 2000, a formal administrative hearing in this case was held in Jacksonville, Florida, before Don W. Davis, Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Roger L. D. Williams, Esquire

Department of Children and Family Services,

Post Office Box 2417 Jacksonville, Florida 32231-0083


For Respondents: Ennis and Sharon Clements, pro se

1173 Lake Forest Blvd. Jacksonville, Florida 32208


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue is whether Ennis and Sharon Clements (Respondents) committed the violations set forth in correspondence of the Department of Children and Family Services (Petitioner); and, if so what penalty should be imposed with regard to Respondents' Foster Care License?

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By letter dated April 10, 2000, Petitioner informed Respondents that their foster care license would be revoked effective April 7, 2000.

Respondents disputed the revocation and requested a formal administrative hearing on the matter. Petitioner forwarded the request to the Division of Administrative Hearings, which scheduled and conducted the proceeding.

At the final hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony of four witnesses and two exhibits. Respondents testified on their own behalf, as did their son, Shannon.

A Transcript of the final hearing was filed on October 25, 2000. Petitioner filed a Proposed Recommended Order which has been considered in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

Respondents did not file a proposed recommended order and none had been received at the time of preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Respondents are licensed by Petitioner as foster parents on an annual basis. They were last licensed by Petitioner on August 18, 1999.

  2. On or about December 23, 1999, Petitioner's representatives received a telephone call with regard to a minor child in Respondents' custody named D.H. Allegations were made that D.H. had been discovered to have bruises on both arms, his

    back and legs in the course of a visit to the family visitation center. The family visitation center is a facility operated by Petitioner where foster children are brought for visitation with their real parents.

  3. A family services counselor in Petitioner's employ investigated the matter and observed the bruises and stripes on D.H.'s body on December 23, 1999, and made an immediate referral of the matter to Petitioner's child protection team. Bruce McIntosh, M.D., is a member of the team. He examined D.H. and determined that the injuries to the child were consistent with being struck many times with a belt and constituted, in his expert opinion, child abuse. Photographs presented at the final hearing and taken in proximity to the examination corroborate Dr. McIntosh's findings.

  4. The testimony of the minor child, D.H., at the final hearing establishes that he had been struck several times by Respondent Ennis Clements and Shannon, the teenage son of Respondents, prior to D.H.'s travel to the family visitation center.

  5. Prior to licensure, Respondents were told that corporal punishment was not to be used with regard to foster children placed with them by Petitioner. Both Respondents signed forms at the time of their licensure as foster parents, indicating their understanding of this directive from Petitioner.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  6. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and subject matter of this proceeding. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

  7. In accordance with the definition of "License" contained in Section 409.175(f), Florida Statutes, the licensure status previously awarded Respondents by Petitioner does not create a property right and may not be considered to be a professional license. Accordingly, Petitioner need only establish by a preponderance of the evidence a reason sufficient to justify the revocation of Respondents' foster home licensure. In this case, the burden has been met.

  8. Rule 65C-13.010(1)(b)5., Florida Administrative Code, unequivocally establishes that foster children may not be subjected to corporal punishment either by the foster parent or another child in the home. To a preponderance, the evidence establishes that such corporal punishment was accorded to the minor child, D.H., by Ennis Clements and his son, Shannon.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is recommended that a final order be entered by Petitioner confirming the revocation of Respondents' licensure.

DONE AND ENTERED this 13th day of November, 2000, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


DON W. DAVIS

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 13th day of November, 2000.



COPIES FURNISHED:


Roger L. D. Williams, Esquire Department of Children and

Family Services Post Office Box 2417

Jacksonville, Florida 32231-0083


Ennis Clements Sharon Clements

1173 Lake Forest Boulevard Jacksonville, Florida 32208


Virginia A. Daire, Agency Clerk Department of Children and

Family Services Building 2, Room 204B 1317 Winewood Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700


Josie Tomayo, General Counsel Department of Children and

Family Services Building 2, Room 204B 1317 Winewood Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 00-001952
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 21, 2000 Final Order Adopting Recommended Order and Revoking Foster Home Care Licensure filed.
Nov. 13, 2000 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Nov. 13, 2000 Recommended Order issued (hearing held September 26, 2000) CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 03, 2000 Proposed Recommended Order (filed by R. Williams via facsimile).
Oct. 26, 2000 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Oct. 25, 2000 Transcript (Volume 1) filed.
Sep. 19, 2000 Response to Prehearing Instructions (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Jun. 13, 2000 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions sent out.
Jun. 13, 2000 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for September 26, 2000; 10:30 a.m.; Jacksonville, FL)
May 25, 2000 Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
May 17, 2000 Initial Order issued.
May 10, 2000 Agency Action filed.
May 10, 2000 Request for Hearing filed.
May 10, 2000 Notice filed.

Orders for Case No: 00-001952
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 19, 2000 Agency Final Order
Sep. 13, 2000 Recommended Order Corporal punishment administered to foster child violates licensure regulation and suffices as basis for revocation of foster care license.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer