Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: FRED T. GARRETT
Judges: JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Aug. 31, 2001
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, February 15, 2002.
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2002
Summary: The issues are whether Respondent committed the several violations of Sections 489.129(1)(h)2.,(h)3.,(j),(k), and (n), Florida Statutes (1997), for the reasons stated in the respective Administrative Complaints and, if so, what, if any, penalties should be imposed. (All chapter and section references are to Florida Statutes (1997) unless otherwise stated.)Petitioner demonstrated that licensed general contractor had committed disciplinable offenses in the practice of contracting. Recommended a f
Summary: The issues are whether Respondent committed the several violations of Sections 489.129(1)(h)2.,(h)3.,(j),(k), and (n), Florida Statutes (1997), for the reasons stated in the respective Administrative Complaints and, if so, what, if any, penalties should be imposed. (All chapter and section references are to Florida Statutes (1997) unless otherwise stated.)Petitioner demonstrated that licensed general contractor had committed disciplinable offenses in the practice of contracting. Recommended a fine, probation, reimbursement of investigative costs, and restitution.
More
STATE OF FLORIDA 07 /
* DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION dip * Se
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD ; 3
DIVISION I
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ~
Petitioner,
vs. ; , Case No. 99-02187
01-34 J4PL
FRED T. GARRETT, . .
| Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Construction Industry Licensing
Board, against FRED T. GARRETT, ("Respondent"), and says:
1, Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of contracting
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a Certified General ;
Contractor, in the State of Florida, having been issued license number CG C059414.
3. Respondent's last known address is 3700 NE 28th Avenue, Lighthouse Point,
Florida 33064. .
4. Atall times material hereto, Respondent was the licensed qualifier for Fred T.
Garrett Construction, Inc. ("FTG Construction").
5. Section 489.1195(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that all primary qualifying
+ esx eC SC 2 AAS Ushers sete
agents fora business organization are jointly and equally responsible for supervision of all
operations of the business organization; for all field work at all sites; and for financial matters,
both for the organization in general and for each specific job.
6. The Respondent failed to obtain a Certificate of Authority for FTG Construction
as required by Section 489.1 19(2), Florida Statutes.
7. Onorabout January 10, 1998, William Kerrigan, doing business as Lakeview _
Concepts, Inc.("Lakeview") and not licensed by the CILB, entered into a contract with Shek
Kong to set up and build a dry cleaning store at 5171 S. University Drive, Davie, Florida.
8. Kong paid Lakeview a total of $17,770.00 through check numbers 2010 and 2336.
9. In or around J anuary 1998, Lakeview hired the Respondent to ‘Perform demolition
work on the aforementioned property.
10. From January through June of 1998, the Respondent performed demolition work
" on the aforementioned property. | .
. 11. | Onorabout June 1 7, 1998, permit 98-00002349 was issued to the Respondent to
perform alterations on the aforementioned ‘Property.
12. (Ono or around July, 1998, Lakeview stepped out of the project.
3 “On or about July 30, 1998, the Respondent, doing business as FTG Construction,
contracted with Kong to complete the uforementiond project in 60 or 90 days.
14, _ The total contract price was $22,300.00.
15. The contract did not contain a written Statement explaining the consumer's right
under the Construction Industries Recovery Fund as required by Section 489.1425, Florida
Statutes.
EPR oer
ae
ba ncihhamednetiesieiaiatticiindtiiail
16. From August through September of 1998, the Respondent received payments
totaling $6,600.00 from Kong.
17. On or about November 6, 1998, the Respondent had not completed the project and
ceased work. |
18, __ The Respondent's work was of poor quality. .
19. On or about November 14, 1998, Douglas Frankow, license number CB C052960,
submitted an estimate of $20, 562.00 to complete the Project.
20. On or about July 21, 1999, Frankow submitted a statement to the Petitioner
describing the work on the project as substandard, incomplete, and constructed incompetently.
21. — On or about June 30, 1999, Kong contracted with George Settergren, license .
number CG C045306, to complete the project. . : |
22. The total contract price with Settergren was $22, 124.46.
23, On or about August 2, 1998, a Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the
project. 7 Lo
. 24. ° Onor about July 20, 1999, a Default Judgment was entered against the
Respondent, in favor of Kong, for case number 98-9905, in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial
Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida.
COUNT 1
os 25. ‘Petitioner Tealleges and i incorporates the allegations set forth is in Paragraphs One
through Twenty-Four as though fully set forth herein.
26. ~ “Section 489. 12708), Florida Statutes, provides that a certified dorresiered oo
contractor, or contractor authorized by a local construction regulation board to do contracting,
may not apply for or obtain a building permit for construction work unless the certified or
registered contractor, or contractor authorized by a local construction regulation board to do
contracting, or business organization duly qualified by said contractor, has entered into a contract
to make improvements to, or perform the contracting at, the real property specified in the
application or permit. This paragraph does not prohibit a contractor from applying for or
obtaining a building permit to allow the contractor to perform work for another person without
compensation or to perform work on property that is owned by the contractor.
27. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violation Section 489.129( 1)G), Florida
_ Statutes, by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or violating
arule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT II
28. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs. One
through Twenty-Four as though fully set forth herein.
29. Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes, requires that if an applicant proposes to engage
in contracting as a business organization, including any partnership, corporation, business trust, or
other legal entity, or in any name other than the applicant’s legal name or a fictitious name where.
. the applicant is doing business as a sole proprietorship, the business organization must apply for a
certificate of authority through a qualifying agent and under a fictitious name, if any.
A
Statutes, by failing in a material respect to comply with the provisions of Part I of Chapter 489.
30. “Based on the e foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489, 129(1)G), Florida
3
;
|
cegee segue ppemener «pee pee
ihe
ce ith aM pe Re
re nine te tm eR ERTS ES RAT a a
COUNT II}
« .
31. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs One
through Twenty-Four as though fully set forth herein.
32. Section 489.142(5)(1) provides that any agreement or contract for repair, .
restoration, improvement, or construction to residential real property must contain a written
statement explaining the consumer's ri ghts under the Construction Industries Recovery Fund,
except where the value of all labor and materials does not exceed $2,500.
33. Based on foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489. 129(1)G), Florida
Statutes, by failing in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or violating
a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT IV
34. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs One
through Twenty- Four as though fully set forth herein.
35. . Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(k), Florida
Statutes, by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned after 90 days if the contractor
terminates the project without just cause or without proper notification to the owner, including .
the reason for termination, or fails to perform work without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
. COUNT V ~ .
36. - Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs One |
through Twenty- Four as though fully set forth herein.
37. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(n), Florida
5
ae tannin ae eae ot < nesta E
Statutes, by committing incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting,
e
COUNT VI
38. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs One
through Twenty- Four as though fully set forth herein.
39. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129( 1)(0), Florida
Statutes, by committing incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting. |
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Construction Industry Licensing
Board enter an Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
“reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or renewal of the certificate or
registration, require financial restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education, assess costs associated with
investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2),
Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to
Chapters 489, 455, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
Signed this 548 day of Pesach L\ /, 2000.
FILED
Department of Business and Professional Raguiahion =
; _ DEPUTY CLERK —
’ PCP: August 29, 2000
Alford & Burke
ee ae
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Patrick F. Creehan
Assistant General Counsel
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
Office of the General Counsel
1940 N. Monroe Street, Ste. 60
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202
PFC/km
Case # 99-02187
ot
Docket for Case No: 01-003479PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jul. 03, 2002 |
Final Order filed.
|
Feb. 15, 2002 |
Recommended Order issued (hearing held December 18, 2001) CASE CLOSED.
|
Feb. 15, 2002 |
Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
|
Jan. 08, 2002 |
(Proposed) Recommended Order filed by Petitioner.
|
Jan. 07, 2002 |
Transcript filed. |
Dec. 28, 2001 |
Petitioner`s Exhibits filed.
|
Dec. 26, 2001 |
Letter to Judge Van Laningham from P. Butler regarding petitioner`s exhibits filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2001 |
Order of Post-Hearing Instructions issued.
|
Dec. 18, 2001 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames. |
Nov. 02, 2001 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for December 18, 2001; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Oct. 31, 2001 |
Letter to Judge Sartin from F. Garrett requesting a continuance (filed via facsimile).
|
Oct. 22, 2001 |
Petitioner`s List of Witnesses filed.
|
Sep. 12, 2001 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Sep. 12, 2001 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for November 5 and 6, 2001; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Sep. 12, 2001 |
Order Granting Petitioner`s Motion to Consolidate issued. (consolidated cases are: 01-003479PL, 01-003480PL, 01-003481PL)
|
Sep. 11, 2001 |
Petitioner`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 04, 2001 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Aug. 31, 2001 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Aug. 31, 2001 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 31, 2001 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Orders for Case No: 01-003479PL
Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
Jul. 03, 2002 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Feb. 15, 2002 |
Recommended Order
|
Petitioner demonstrated that licensed general contractor had committed disciplinable offenses in the practice of contracting. Recommended a fine, probation, reimbursement of investigative costs, and restitution.
|