Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs EDWARD LEEDS, 03-001435PL (2003)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 03-001435PL Visitors: 15
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS
Respondent: EDWARD LEEDS
Judges: FLORENCE SNYDER RIVAS
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Apr. 18, 2003
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, September 2, 2003.

Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2004
Summary: The issues for determination are whether Respondent committed the violations set forth in the administrative complaint dated May 16, 2003, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Hearing aid specialist`s license revoked on clear and convincing evidence of incompetence.
03-1435.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF ) HEARING AID SPECIALISTS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

EDWARD LEEDS, )

)

Respondent. )


Case No. 03-1435PL

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was held on July 25, 2003, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, before Florence Snyder Rivas, a duly-designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Diane L. Guillemette, Esquire

Office of the Attorney General The Capitol, Plaza Level 01 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050


For Respondent: Barry L. Halpern, Esquire

Law Offices of Barry L. Halpern 2650 Biscayne Boulevard

Miami, Florida 33137


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES


The issues for determination are whether Respondent committed the violations set forth in the administrative

complaint dated May 16, 2003, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By administrative complaint dated May 16, 2003, Petitioner seeks to revoke the professional license of Respondent, Edward Leeds (Respondent or Leeds) on the grounds of incompetence.

Leeds timely asserted his right to contest the proposed grounds for discipline, and a final hearing was scheduled in due course.

The identity of witnesses, exhibits, and attendant rulings is set forth in the record of the proceedings.

No transcript was provided. The parties submitted proposed recommended orders which have been carefully considered.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. At all times material to this case, Leeds has been a licensed hearing aid specialist practicing in Coconut Creek, Florida.

  2. In 1997, Leeds, then age 77, contracted with patient


    M. M. to dispense and deliver patient M. M. a hearing aid.


  3. The hearing aid failed to perform in a satisfactory manner. The failure occurred because Leeds failed to discharge his professional duties in accordance with minimum performance standards for persons providing hearing aid services in Florida.

  4. In particular, Leeds failed to take an appropriate

    patient history; failed to conduct a physical examination which conformed to the minimum standards and procedures called for by the statutes and rules regulating persons licensed to dispense hearing aids; and failed to create and maintain an adequate patient record.

  5. By way of defense, Leeds testified that he performed certain tests which were not reflected in his patient records. This testimony was not credible. Even if Leeds had performed the tests he claimed to have performed, his failure to document them is, standing alone, a serious departure from minimal professional standards.

  6. Respondent has been reprimanded by the Board of Hearing Aid Specialists on three prior occasions.

    CONCLUSION OF LAW


  7. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of these proceedings. Section 120.57(1).

  8. At all times material to this case, Petitioner is the state agency responsible for the licensing and discipline of hearing aid specialists. Because Petitioner seeks to revoke Leeds' license, it must prove the material allegations of the administrative complaint by clear and convincing evidence. Department of Banking and Finance v. Osborne Stern and Company Inc., 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla 1996).

  9. The evidence clearly and convincingly established that Respondent's treatment of M. M. constituted incompetence within the meaning of Section 484.056(1)(g).

  10. The record as a whole, including Leeds' lengthening disciplinary history, suggests that Leeds' deficient performance is the product of his advancing years, rather than malicious intent. The state's compelling interest in protecting the public from unskilled providers of hearing aid services compels the conclusion that if Respondent is not willing to voluntarily surrender his license, it must be revoked.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is recommended that a final order be entered revoking Respondent's license to dispense hearing aids.

DONE AND ENTERED this 5th day of September, 2003, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

FLORENCE SNYDER RIVAS

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us

Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 5th day of September, 2003.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Susan Foster, Executive Director Board of Hearing Aid Specialist Department of Health

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C08 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701


William W. Large, General Counsel Department of Health

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A02 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701


Diane L. Guillemette, Esquire Office of the Attorney General The Capitol, Plaza Level 01 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050


Barry L. Halpern, Esquire

Law Offices of Barry L. Halpern 2650 Biscayne Boulevard

Miami, Florida 33137


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 03-001435PL
Issue Date Proceedings
Jun. 16, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appeal Dismissed.
Jun. 14, 2004 Appellant`s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed.
May 17, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellant`s motion filed May 10, 2004, for extension of time is granted.
May 03, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellee is ordered to file a report within ten (10) days of the date of this order.
Mar. 26, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellant`s motion filed March 18, 2004, for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief withing thirty (30) days from the receipt of the transcript and the index to the record.
Mar. 05, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Ordered that appellee`s motion filed March 1, 2004, for extension of time is granted and the time in which to serve the initial index is hereby extended thirty (30) days frim the entry of this order.
Feb. 09, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Ordered that appellant`s motion filed January 6, 2004, for stay on an expedited basis is hereby denied.
Feb. 02, 2004 Appellant`s Response to Appellee`s Response to Motion for Stay on an Expedited Basis filed.
Jan. 28, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Ordered that appellant`s motion for extension of time filed January 26, 2004, is granted.
Jan. 26, 2004 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply filed.
Jan. 20, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellant is directed to reply, within five 5 days from the date of this order, to appellee`s response in opposition to appellant`s motion for stay on an expedited basis.
Jan. 14, 2004 Appellee`s Response in Opposition to Appellant`s Motion for Stay on an Expedited Basis filed.
Jan. 12, 2004 Directions to Clerk filed.
Jan. 12, 2004 Docketing Statement and Notice of Appearance of Counsel filed.
Jan. 08, 2004 Notice of Appeal filed.
Jan. 08, 2004 Acknowledgment of New Case No. 4D04-22 filed.
Jan. 08, 2004 Motion for Stay on an Expedited Basis filed.
Dec. 10, 2003 Final Order filed.
Sep. 15, 2003 Exceptions to Recommended Order filed by Respondent.
Sep. 05, 2003 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Sep. 05, 2003 Recommended Order (hearing held July 25, 2003). CASE CLOSED.
Aug. 13, 2003 Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Aug. 05, 2003 Memorandum of Law (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Aug. 05, 2003 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 29, 2003 Leter to Judge Rivas from B. Halpern stating transcript has been ordered and will submit finding of fact et al 10 days after receipt of transcript (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 25, 2003 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Jul. 14, 2003 DOH`s Amended Witness List (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 11, 2003 Petitioner`s Response to Request for Production filed.
Jun. 19, 2003 Request for Production filed by Respondent.
Jun. 11, 2003 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for July 25, 2003; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
Jun. 06, 2003 DOH`s Witness List (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 06, 2003 Motion for Continuance (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
May 19, 2003 Answer to Administrative Complaint filed by Respondent.
May 01, 2003 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
May 01, 2003 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for June 18, 2003; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
Apr. 21, 2003 Initial Order issued.
Apr. 18, 2003 Election of Rights filed.
Apr. 18, 2003 Administrative Complaint filed.
Apr. 18, 2003 Referral for Hearing filed.

Orders for Case No: 03-001435PL
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 09, 2003 Agency Final Order
Sep. 05, 2003 Recommended Order Hearing aid specialist`s license revoked on clear and convincing evidence of incompetence.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer