Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs. RAMIRO PALMA, 81-002658 (1981)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 81-002658 Visitors: 17
Judges: D. R. ALEXANDER
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 1990
Summary: Contractor diverted funds and failed to finish project. Suspend license.
81-2658

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ) REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ) LICENSING BOARD, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 81-2658

)

RAMIRO PALMA, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a formal hearing was held before the Division of Administrative Hearings by its duly designated Hearing Officer, DONALD R. ALEXANDER, on January 6, 1982, in Orlando, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Drucilla E. Bell, Esquire

130 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301


For Respondent: Ramiro Palma in pro se

2315 East South Street Orlando, Florida 32803


BACKGROUND


By Administrative Complaint dated August 31, 1981, Petitioner, Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board, has charged that Respondent, Ramiro Palma, violated certain statutory provisions while acting in the capacity of a registered building contractor. Specifically it is charged that Respondent (1) failed to affix his registration number to a contract entered into on or about January 14, 1979, in contravention of Subsection 468.107(6), Florida Statutes (1977) 1/ and that by failing to do so, he also violated Subsection 468.112(2)(g), Florida Statutes (1977) 2/, and

  1. diverted funds received for completion of a specified construction project and, as a result of said diversion, was unable to fulfill the terms of his obligation under the contract in violation of Subsection 468.112(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1977) 3/.


    Respondent disputed the allegations in the Administrative Complaint and requested a formal hearing to contest the charges pursuant to Subsection 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. The matter was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings on October 22, 1981, with request that a Hearing Officer be assigned to conduct a hearing.

    By Notice of Hearing dated November 5, 1981, the final hearing was scheduled for January 6, 1982, in Orlando, Florida. Petitioner presented the testimony of Oliver Johnson and offered Petitioner's Exhibits 1-8, each of which was received into evidence. Respondent testified on his own behalf and offered Respondent's Exhibits 1-4, each of which was received into evidence.


    Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed by Petitioner on January 18, 1982, and have been considered by the undersigned in the preparation of this order. Findings of fact not included in this order were considered immaterial, not relevant to the issues, or were not supported by competent and substantial evidence.


    The issue herein is whether Respondent's registered building contractor's license should be revoked or suspended, or whether he should be otherwise disciplined for allegedly failing to affix his registration number to a contract and diverting funds received for completion of a construction project.


    Based upon all the evidence, the following findings of fact are determined: FINDINGS OF FACT

    1. At all times relevant hereto, Respondent, Ramiro Palma, held registered building contractor license number RB 0031505 issued by Petitioner, Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board. He has held the license since 1977 and his offices are located in Orlando, Florida.


    2. On or about January 14, 1979, Respondent entered into a contract with Oliver W. Johnson to construct a single story residence at 648 Morton Lane, Winter Springs, Florida. The contract called for Johnson to pay Respondent

      $76,800, and for the home to be substantially completed within six months after starting. Respondent failed to affix his registration number to the contract as required by law.


    3. A change order in the terms of the contract was executed by both parties on May 18, 1979, which added and deleted a number of items and increased the contract price to $79,100. However, it did not affect the original completion date of August, 1979.


    4. In July, 1979, Respondent received the second bank draw on the home construction loan which brought the total amount of money he had received to

      $42,500. Of that amount, Palma retained $11,827 as a contractor's fee and for undisclosed "overhead expenses".


    5. When Johnson inspected his home in August, 1979, he found it only 30 percent to 35 percent completed. Johnson met with Palma was told that Respondent was running short of cash and could not pay the subcontractors to complete the job.


    6. In mid-September, 1979, Johnson requested Palma to furnish him a list of unpaid bills on the project. These totaled $19,237.78. Johnson also discovered that at least $11,000 in additional funds over and above the $79,100 contract price would be required to finish the home. As a result of these discoveries, another change order in the contract was executed on October 15, 1979, in which the completion date was extended to November 30, 1979. Palma

      also agreed to deduct $513.38 per month from the contract price beginning October 1, 1979, for interest charges, rent and furniture storage costs incurred by Johnson until the house was completed. At the same time, Palma promised Johnson that all cash shortages would be covered by the closing date of December 18, 1979. The closing date was subsequently extended to December 29, 1979.


    7. At the closing Palma reimbursed Johnson only $1,800. He has failed to repay any other moneys since that time. Three liens totaling $8,363.41 were filed against the property in late December, 1979, and early January, 1980. In order to satisfy all outstanding liens and bills, Johnson was forced to obtain a second mortgage on his home in the amount of $17,845.


    8. Palma blamed many of the cost increases on subcontractors who were not closely supervised, and changes in the contract. He acknowledged keeping almost

      $12,000 of the $42,500 received as contractor's fee and overhead expenses even though the house was incomplete and the contract did not specify a fee for the contractor.


      CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


    9. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties thereto pursuant to Subsection 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.


    10. Subsection 468.107(6), Florida Statutes (1977) provides in part as follows:


      (6) Each registered or certified contractor shall affix the number of his registration or certifi- cation to all his contracts and bids.


    11. Subsection 468.112(2), Florida Statutes (1977) provides that the Board may discipline a licensee who is found guilty of the following:


      (2)(g) Failure in any material respect to comply with the provisions of this act.


      Respondent failed to affix his registration number to the original contract in violation of Subsection 468.107(6), supra, and may be disciplined for failing to comply in a material respect with a provision of Chapter 468. Accordingly, it is concluded that Respondent is guilty of violating those statutory provisions.

    12. Subsection 468.112(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1977) prohibits the [d]iversion of funds...received for...completion of

      a specified construction project or operation when as a result of the diversion the contractor is or

      will be unable to fulfill the terms of his obligation or contract.


      It is undisputed that Palma diverted almost $12,000 from the construction loan funds for his own use. As a result of this diversion, he was unable to fulfill the terms of the contract. Therefore, it is concluded that Respondent has violated the aforesaid statute.

    13. Petitioner has recommended that Respondent's license be suspended for one year and that he be assessed a $1,000 administrative fine. Given the nature of the violations herein, it is concluded that this penalty is appropriate.


RECOMMENDATION

Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that Respondent, Ramiro Palma, be found guilty as charged in

the Administrative Complaint dated August 31, 1981. It is further


RECOMMENDED that Respondent's registered building contractor's license be suspended for one year after the date of the final order entered in this proceeding and that Respondent pay a $1000 administrative fine.


DONE and ENTERED this 3rd day of February, 1982, in Tallahassee, Florida.


DONALD R. ALEXANDER

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building

2009 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 3rd day of February, 1982.


ENDNOTES


1/ Subsection 468.107(6) was subsequently renumbered as Subsection 489.119(5), Florida Statutes (1979) without change.


2/ Subsection 468.112(2)(g) was renumbered by the 1979 Legislature as Subsection 489.129(1)(j) Florida Statutes, without change.


3/ Subsection 468.112(2)(e) was renumbered as Subsection 489.129(1)(h), Florida Statutes (1979) without change.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Drucilla E. Bell, Esquire Department of Professional

Regulation

130 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Ramiro Palma

2315 East South Street Orlando, Florida 32803

================================================================= AGENCY FINAL ORDER

=================================================================


STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD


DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION/CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD,


Petitioner,


vs. CASE NO. 0001024

DOAH CASE NO. 81-2658

RAMIRO PALMA, RB 0031505

1501 Falcon Drive

Orlando, Florida 32803


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER


This matter came for final action by the Construction Industry Licensing Board on April 16, 1982, in Tampa, Florida. A formal hearing held pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, resulted in the issuance of a recommended order (attached hereto as Exhibit A) which was reviewed by the Board.

Petitioner filed exceptions to said order which were also reviewed by the Board. Following a review of the complete record of the proceedings, it is ORDERED:


  1. The findings of fact contained in the Recommended Order are approved and adopted and incorporated herein by reference.


  2. The conclusions of law contained in the Recommended Order are approved and adopted and incorporated herein by reference.


  3. The recommendation of the Hearing Officer is rejected. Following a review of the complete record, the Board adopts the exceptions to the recommended penalty as filed by Petitioner.


THEREFORE


It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the registered building contractor's license of the Respondent be and is hereby suspended for a period of five (5) years; provided, however, that the suspension may be lifted after a period of two (2) years if the Respondent provides satisfactory evidence to the Board that he has made restitution to the consumer named in the administrative complaint filed against the Respondent. It is further ORDERED that the Respondent be and is hereby fined 1000.00.

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of April, 1982.


FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD


John Henry Jones, Chairman


Docket for Case No: 81-002658
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 04, 1990 Final Order filed.
Feb. 03, 1982 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 81-002658
Issue Date Document Summary
Apr. 23, 1982 Agency Final Order
Feb. 03, 1982 Recommended Order Contractor diverted funds and failed to finish project. Suspend license.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer