STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
KELLIE DAWN SHIVER and RONALD L. )
SHIVER, as parents and natural ) guardians of CASSIDY TAYLOR SHIVER, ) a minor, )
)
Petitioners, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 98-4879N
) FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL ) INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, )
)
Respondent. )
)
FINAL ORDER
Pursuant to notice, Administrative Law Judge, William J. Kendrick of the Division of Administrative Hearings, held a formal hearing in the above-styled case on November 4, 1999, by teleconference.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioners: Teresa P. Williams, Esquire
Beltz & Ruth, P.A. Post Office Box 16008
St. Petersburg, Florida 33733
Ronald S. Gilbert, Esquire Morgan, Colling & Gilbert, P.A. Post Office Box 4979
Orlando, Florida 32802-4979
For Respondent: W. Douglas Moody, Jr., Esquire
Graham, Moody & Sox, P.A.
101 North Gadsden Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
At issue in this proceeding is whether Cassidy Taylor Shiver, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
On November 2, 1998, Kellie Dawn Shiver and Ronald L. Shiver, as parents and natural guardians of Cassidy Taylor Shiver, a minor, filed a petition (claim) with the Division of Administrative Hearings (hereinafter referred to as "DOAH") for compensation under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan").
DOAH served the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (hereinafter referred to as "NICA") with a copy of the claim on November 3, 1998. NICA reviewed the claim, and on January 22, 1999, gave notice that it had "determined that such claim is not a 'birth-related neurological injury' within the meaning of Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes," and requested that "an order [be entered] setting a hearing in this cause [on such issue]." Such a hearing was held on November 4, 1999.
At hearing, the parties stipulated to the factual matters set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Findings of Fact, and Petitioners' Exhibits 1 through 9 and Respondent's Exhibit 1 were received into evidence. No other exhibits were offered, no
witnesses were called, and the transcript of the hearing was not ordered. Consequently, the parties were accorded until
November 15, 1999, to file proposed final orders. Petitioners elected to file such a proposal and it has been adopted in substance.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Fundamental findings
Kellie Dawn Shiver and Robert L. Shiver are the parents and natural guardians of Cassidy Taylor Shiver (Cassidy), a minor. Cassidy was born a live infant on November 5, 1996, at DeSoto Memorial Hospital, a hospital located in Arcadia, Florida, and her birth weight was in excess of 2500 grams.
The physician providing obstetrical services during Cassidy's birth was Dumitru-Dan Teodoreseu, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the Plan), as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes.
Coverage under the Plan
Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded under the Plan when the claimant demonstrates, more likely than not, that the infant suffered an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired."
Sections 766.302(2) and 766.309(1)(a), Florida Statutes. Here, Cassidy's neurologic condition is dispositive of the claim and it is unnecessary to address the timing or cause of her condition.
Cassidy's neurologic status
On January 7, 1999, following the filing of the claim for compensation, Cassidy was evaluated by Michael Duchowny, M.D., a board-certified pediatric neurologist. Dr. Duchowny chronicled Cassidy's history and the results of his examination as follows:
I evaluated Cassidy Shiver on January 7, 1999. Cassidy is a 2 year old girl who comes for an evaluation of developmental problems. Cassidy was accompanied by her mother and maternal grandmother.
HISTORY ACCORDING TO THE FAMILY: The family
began by explaining that Cassidy's seizures are her main ongoing problem. She had her last seizure several weeks ago and is now taking phenobarbital 20 mg b.i.d. Her seizure onset was at 2 months of age. She has essentially had persistent seizures, except for a 6 month seizure free interval. Each episode lasts approximately 1 to 2 minutes and typically occurs 15 to 20 minutes after falling asleep.
Cassidy experiences the rapid onset of tonic and subsequently clonic movements primarily involving the upper extremities. They are associated with loss of consciousness and foaming at the mouth. She has a period of postictal depression before regaining normal baseline status during daytime attacks.
Cassidy was allegedly the product of a 32 weeks gestation, born with the birth weight of 5-pounds, 9-ounces. The delivery was by a vacuum extraction and left Cassidy with a large right cephalohematoma. There was a significant collection of blood which
ultimately "ruptured". Mrs. Shiver indicated that Cassidy experienced damage to both frontal lobes which was documented on both CT and MRI studies.
Despite Cassidy's stormy neonatal course, her growth and development have proceeded reasonably well. She walked at 16 months and said single words at 22 months. She is not yet potty trained. Cassidy is fully immunized, has no known allergies and has never undergone surgery. She sporadically sees physical and occupational therapist, but Mrs. Shiver's [sic] performs the therapies at home. Cassidy has made a remarkable recovery, in that her motor function is essentially within the normal range with the exception of a minor arm asymmetry and with decreased left swing.
Cassidy is quite curious and socially engaging. Her vision and hearing are said to be adequate and there has been no deterioration in her overall developmental level.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION today reveals Cassidy to be alert and cooperative. The skin is warm and moist. Her hair is blonde and of normal texture. Cassidy's head circumference measures 50.2 cm which is within standard percentiles. The anterior and posterior fontanelles are closed. There are no significant cranial or facial asymmetries.
The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are normal.
NEUROLOGICAL EXMINATION reveals Cassidy to be alert, curious and slightly overactive. She does participate in the examination fully and is socially engaging. Cassidy maintains central gaze fixation and demonstrates conjugate following movements. The pupils are 4 mm and react briskly to direct and consentually presented light. There are no fundoscopic abnormalities. The tongue and palate move well. Motor examination reveals symmetric strength, bulk and tone. There are
no adventitious movements or evidence of focal weakness. The gait is stable with an arm swing that indeed shows some posturing of the left arm. This is minimal however and does not affect Cassidy's stance or balance. She demonstrates good dexterity with both hands and has a well developed fine motor coordination for age. She uses both hands in a coordinated fashion. The deep tendon reflexes are 2+ and symmetric with flexor plantar responses. There is no evidence of gait, truncal or extremity ataxia. The neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. The sensory examination is deferred. Cassidy did not speak in words or sentences at any time during the evaluation, but tends to verbalize consonants only.
In SUMMARY, Cassidy's neurologic examination reveals evidence of an expressive language delay and a minor non-functional asymmetry of upper arm swing on her gait. Otherwise, Cassidy appears to be developing well and is being managed appropriately for her seizure diathesis.
In Dr. Duchowny's opinion, which is credited, Cassidy is not currently substantially physically impaired and, notwithstanding any events which may have occurred at birth, is not likely to be so impaired in the future. 1/ (Respondent's Exhibit 1, pages 8, 9, and 11.)
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, these proceedings. Section 766.301, et seq., Florida Statutes.
The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the "Plan") was established by the Legislature
"for the purpose of providing compensation, irrespective of fault, for birth-related neurological injury claims" relating to births occurring on or after January 1, 1989. Section 766.303(1), Florida Statutes.
The injured "infant, his personal representative, parents, dependents, and next of kin," may seek compensation under the Plan by filing a claim for compensation with the Division of Administrative Hearings. Sections 766.302(3), 766.303(2), 766.305(1), and 766.313, Florida Statutes. The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA), which administers the Plan, has "45 days from the date of service of a complete claim . . . in which to file a response to the petition and to submit relevant written information relating to the issue of whether the injury is a birth-related neurological injury." Section 766.305(3), Florida Statutes.
If NICA determines that the injury alleged in a claim is a compensable birth-related neurological injury, it may award compensation to the claimant, provided that the award is approved by the administrative law judge to whom the claim has been assigned. Section 766.305(6), Florida Statutes. If, on the other hand, NICA disputes the claim, as it has in the instant case, the dispute must be resolved by the assigned administrative law judge in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 120,
Florida Statutes. Sections 766.304, 766.307, 766.309, and
766.31, Florida Statutes.
In discharging this responsibility, the administrative law judge must make the following determination based upon the available evidence:
Whether the injury claimed is a birth- related neurological injury. If the claimant has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the administrative law judge, that the infant has sustained a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury and that the infant was thereby rendered permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired, a rebuttable presumption shall arise that the injury is a birth-related neurological injury as defined in s. 766.303(2).
Whether obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital; or by a certified nurse midwife in a teaching hospital supervised by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital.
Section 766.309(1), Florida Statutes. An award may be sustained only if the administrative law judge concludes that the "infant has sustained a birth-related neurological injury and that obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician at birth." Section 766.31(1), Florida Statutes.
Pertinent to this case, "birth-related neurological injury" is defined by Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, to mean:
. . . injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. This definition shall apply to live births only and shall not include disability or death caused by genetic or congenital abnormality.
As the claimants, the burden rests on Petitioners to demonstrate entitlement to compensation. Section 766.309(1)(a), Florida Statutes. See also Balino v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 348 So. 2d 349, 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), ("[T]he burden of proof, apart from statute, is on the party asserting the affirmative issue before an administrative tribunal.")
Here, the proof demonstrated that notwithstanding any events which may have occurred at birth, Cassidy has not been rendered permanently and substantially physically impaired. Consequently, since Cassidy was not shown to be "permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired," the claim is not compensable under the Plan. Sections 766.302(2) and 766.309(1), Florida Statutes. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association v. Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, 686 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 1997)(In order to obtain coverage under the Plan, the infant must suffer both substantial mental and physical impairment, and it is insufficient that the infant suffer only substantial impairment, either mental or physical.)
Where, as here, the administrative law judge determines that ". . . the injury alleged is not a birth-related neurological injury . . . he [is required to] enter an order [to such effect] and . . . cause a copy of such order to be sent immediately to the parties by registered or certified mail." Section 766.309(2), Florida Statutes. Such an order constitutes final agency action subject to appellate court review. Section 766.311(1), Florida Statutes.
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is
ORDERED that the petition for compensation filed by Kellie Dawn Shiver and Ronald L. Shiver, as parents and natural guardians of Cassidy Taylor Shiver, a minor, be and the same is hereby denied with prejudice.
DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 1999, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
WILLIAM J. KENDRICK
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(904) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (904) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 23rd day of November, 1999.
ENDNOTE
1/ Given the conclusion reached regarding Cassidy's physical presentation, it is unnecessary (for reasons appearing in the Conclusions of Law) to resolve whether Cassidy suffers or is likely to suffer any significant mental impairment.
COPIES FURNISHED:
(By certified mail)
Teresa P. Williams, Esquire Beltz & Ruth, P.A.
Post Office Box 16008
St. Petersburg, Florida 33733
Ronald S. Gilbert, Esquire Morgan, Colling & Gilbert, P.A. Post Office Box 4979
Orlando, Florida 32802-4979
W. Douglas Moody, Jr., Esquire Graham, Moody & Sox, P.A.
101 North Gadsden Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Lynn Larson, Executive Director Florida Birth-Related Neurological
Injury Compensation Association Post Office Box 14567 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4567
Dumitru-Dan Teodoreseu, M.D. 1012 North Mills Avenue Arcadia, Florida 34266
DeSoto Memorial Hospital Legal Department
900 North Robert Avenue Arcadia, Florida 33821
Ms. Charlene Willoughby
Agency for Health Care Administration Consumer Services Unit
Post Office Box 14000 Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Daniel Y. Sumner, General Counsel Department of Insurance
The Capitol, Lower Level 26 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0300
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW
A party who is adversely affected by this Final Order is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Sections 120.68 and 766.311, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the Agency Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings and a second copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. See Section 120.68(2), Florida Statutes, and Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association v. Carreras, 598 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Nov. 23, 1999 | DOAH Final Order | Proof failed to demonstrate that infant was substantially physically impaired. Consequently, claim not covered by the plan. |