Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ANTONIO BELLAMY vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, 02-000999 (2002)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 02-000999 Visitors: 7
Petitioner: ANTONIO BELLAMY
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Judges: DIANE CLEAVINGER
Agency: Department of Children and Family Services
Locations: Shalimar, Florida
Filed: Mar. 12, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, June 26, 2002.

Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2002
Summary: Whether Petitioner is entitled to an exemption from disqualification.Evidence showed Petitioner rehabilitated since incarceration for sale of drugs six years ago.
02-0999.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


ANTONIO BELLAMY,


Petitioner,


vs.


DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,


Respondent.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 02-0999

)

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


This cause came on for formal hearing before Diane Cleavinger, Administrative Law Judge with the Division of Administrative Hearings, on May 10, 2002, in Panama City, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Antonio Bellamy, pro se

604 Hummingbird Street Lynn Haven, Florida 32444


For Respondent: John R. Perry, Esquire

Department of Children and Family Services

2639 North Monroe Street, Room 252-A Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2949


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


Whether Petitioner is entitled to an exemption from disqualification.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By letter dated January 31, 2001, Respondent, Department of Children and Family Services, informed Petitioner, Antonio Bellamy, that, after reviewing its records, it was denying Petitioner's request for an exemption from disqualification.

Petitioner requested a formal hearing on Respondent's denial. Petitioner's request was forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings.

At the hearing, Petitioner testified in his own behalf and offered eight exhibits into evidence. The Department introduced six exhibits into evidence, but did not call any witnesses to testify.

After the hearing, Respondent filed a Proposed Recommended Order on May 16, 2002. Petitioner did not submit a proposed

recommended order.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Petitioner, Anthony Bellamy, is the husband of, and resides with, his wife, Helena Bellamy. Helena Bellamy applied to Respondent, Department of Children and Family Services, for registration of a family day care home in the couple's home in Lynn Haven, Florida. In order for the family day care to be registered with the Department, Mr. Bellamy must satisfy the screening requirements set forth in Chapter 435, Florida Statutes, because he is a member of Ms. Bellamy's family.

  2. In 1995, Mr. Bellamy was a full-time student in Chipola Community College in Marianna, Florida. Mr. Bellamy, who was born and raised in humble circumstances, met a group of individuals who seemed to have all they needed without having to work for it. Mr. Bellamy started associating with this group whose income, it turned out, was derived from the sale of illegal drugs.

  3. Mr. Bellamy, envious of the monied lifestyle of his newfound associates, adopted their ways and started selling marijuana and cocaine to his friends. Mr. Bellamy's favorite place of business was a stand of trees on his father's property, which is, coincidentally, near a public school in Cottondale, Florida. However, Mr. Bellamy did not sell drugs to any of the school children. Mr. Bellamy usually timed his sales to coincide with the paydays of his customers so as to enhance his sales. This usually occurred two or three times per month.

    Mr. Bellamy did not use drugs himself.


  4. On January 11, 16, and 25, and March 6 of 1996, an undercover police officer made purchases of cocaine from

    Mr. Bellamy. On the occasion of his arrest on March 6, 1996,


    55 packets of marijuana and approximately 83 pieces of crack cocaine were found with Mr. Bellamy.

  5. Mr. Bellamy pled nolo contendere to four counts of sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school, one count each of

    possession of cocaine with intent to sell within 1,000 feet of a school, and possession of cannabis with intent to sell within 1,000 feet of a school. Mr. Bellamy was adjudicated guilty of these offenses and sentenced to 22 months of jail time and 10 years of probation.

  6. Mr. Bellamy is still on probation for these offenses.


    He anticipates that he will remain on probation until 2005 or 2006.

  7. Although Mr. Bellamy has not re-offended, he concedes that the fear of re-incarceration if he violates his probation is one factor in his recent good behavior. However, his main reasons for no longer selling drugs is that his incarceration taught him a lesson and that he did not wish to be that type of person or live that type of life, especially since he has married and had children. Incarceration, for Mr. Bellamy, was an epiphany, not to be repeated again.

  8. During his incarceration, Mr. Bellamy was placed on trustee status and permitted to attend Chipola Community College. He completed his degree in electrical engineering and holds a state license for professional engineering. Importantly, Mr. Bellamy passed the character evaluation to become a licensed professional engineer.

  9. After getting out of prison, Mr. Bellamy worked for Southern Bell as an electrical engineer. Southern Bell had full

    knowledge of Mr. Bellamy's criminal history when it employed him. He was and is considered a diligent and productive employee. Mr. Bellamy now has formed his own company and performs electrical engineering services on a contract basis for Southern Bell. Mr. Bellamy also works part-time at Tropical Smoothie. He is entrusted to handle the money from that business. In 1999, Mr. Bellamy married his wife. They now have three children and he is very much a family man who wants to do right by that family. He has the determination and enthusiasm to succeed in his chosen work and life.

  10. Mr. Bellamy is active in his church and counsels the youth in that church to avoid drugs. He utilizes his experience to emphasize his counseling. There was no evidence that

    Mr. Bellamy was ever a danger to children or the disabled. Mr. Bellamy has shown that he is not the same person who dealt drugs and has changed his life for the better. He is entitled to an exemption from disqualification.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  11. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and subject matter of this proceeding. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

  12. For the purposes of this proceeding, the term "child care personnel" includes, inter alia, persons working in a child care facility and persons over the age of 12 residing with a

    child care facility operator if the facility is in or adjacent to the operator's home and family members. Sections 402.301(3) and 402.313, Florida Statutes.

  13. Mrs. Bellamy operates a family day care home out of the residence she shares with Mr. Bellamy. As a consequence, Mr. Bellamy meets the definition of "child care personnel" set forth in Chapter 402, Florida Statutes.

  14. Child care personnel in family day care homes must meet the same standards for good moral character as their counterparts in licensed day care centers. See Sections 402.313(3) and 402.305(2)(a), Florida Statutes.

  15. A person who has pled nolo contendere to certain felony offenses set forth within Chapter 893, Florida Statutes, may not work in a position of special trust with children under the level two standards for good moral character set forth in Section 435.04, Florida Statutes. See Section 435.04(3)(mm), Florida Statutes.

  16. A person who sells or possesses cocaine or marijuana within 1,000 feet of a public school is guilty of a first-degree felony. See Sections 893.03(2)(a)4., 893.13(1)(c)1., 893.03(1)(c)7., and 893.13(1)(c)2., Florida Statutes. In this case, Mr. Bellamy pled nolo contendere to six felony violations of Chapter 893, Florida Statutes. As a consequence, he is

    disqualified by operation of Section 435.04(3)(mm), Florida Statutes, from occupying a position of special trust.

  17. Section 435.07, Florida Statutes, authorizes the Department to grant exemptions from disqualification in certain cases.

  18. The facts of this case establish that Mr. Bellamy is not a danger to children and has rehabilitated himself. Therefore, an exemption from disqualification should be granted.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that the Department of Children and Family Services enter a final order granting Petitioner Antonio Bellamy an exemption from disqualification.

DONE AND ENTERED this 26th day of June, 2002, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


DIANE CLEAVINGER

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 26th day of June, 2002.

COPIES FURNISHED:


Antonio Bellamy

604 Hummingbird Street Lynn Haven, Florida 32444


John R. Perry, Esquire Department of Children and

Family Services

2639 North Monroe Street Building A, Suite 104 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2949


Paul F. Flounlacker, Jr., Agency Clerk Department of Children and

Family Services

1317 Winewood Boulevard Building 2, Room 204B Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700


Josie Tomayo, General Counsel Department of Children and

Family Services

1317 Winewood Boulevard

Building 2, Room 204

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 02-000999
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 14, 2002 Final Order filed.
Jun. 26, 2002 Recommended Order issued (hearing held May 10, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
Jun. 26, 2002 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
May 16, 2002 Respondent`s Recommended Order filed.
May 10, 2002 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Mar. 26, 2002 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
Mar. 26, 2002 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for May 10, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Panama City, FL).
Mar. 22, 2002 Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Mar. 13, 2002 Initial Order issued.
Mar. 12, 2002 Denying Request for Exemption filed.
Mar. 12, 2002 Request for Chapter 120 Hearing filed.
Mar. 12, 2002 Amended Notice (of Agency referral) filed.

Orders for Case No: 02-000999
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 10, 2002 Agency Final Order
Jun. 26, 2002 Recommended Order Evidence showed Petitioner rehabilitated since incarceration for sale of drugs six years ago.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer