Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PABLO RAYA LOPEZ vs GREEN MASTERS, INC., 12-003428 (2012)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 12-003428 Visitors: 2
Petitioner: PABLO RAYA LOPEZ
Respondent: GREEN MASTERS, INC.
Judges: JOHN D. C. NEWTON, II
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: Oct. 19, 2012
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, January 30, 2013.

Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2013
Summary: Did Respondent, Green Masters, Inc. (Green Masters), discriminate against Petitioner, Pablo Raya Lopez, on account of his age?Employee did not prove that employer reduced his wages because of his age. All employees' wages were affected, many negatively, by a comprehensive change in pay structure to link pay to tasks performed. Also, employee was working fewer hours.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


PABLO RAYA LOPEZ, EEOC Case No. 510201202142


Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2012-01289


v. DOAH Case No. 12-3428


GREEN MASTERS, INC., FCHR Order No. 13-026


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM AN UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Pablo Raya Lopez filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - 760.11, Florida Statutes (2011), alleging that Respondent Green Masters, Inc., committed unlawful employment practices on the basis of Petitioner’s age (DOB: 5-11-47) by creating a hostile work environment, by cutting Petitioner’s salary, and by paying younger workers more than Petitioner.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on September 24, 2012, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held by video teleconference at sites in Orlando and Tallahassee, Florida, on January 4, 2013, before Administrative Law Judge John D. C. Newton, II.

Judge Newton issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated January 30, 2013.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries, Inc. v. Commission on Human Relations, et al., 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Accord, Gantz, et al.



Filed April 4, 2013 10:21 AM Division of Administrative Hearings


v. Zion’s Hope, Inc., d/b/a Holy Land Experience, FCHR Order No. 11-048 (June 6, 2011), Mack v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, FCHR Order No. 11-026 (March 17, 2011), Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA, FCHR Order No. 08-007 (January 14, 2008), Beach-Gutierrez v. Bay Medical Center, FCHR Order No. 05-011 (January 19, 2005), and Waaser v. Streit’s Motorsports, FCHR Order No. 04-157 (November 30,

2004).

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact.


Conclusions of Law


We find the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.


DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of April , 2013. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Gilbert M. Singer, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner James Johns; and

Commissioner Michael Keller


Filed this 4th day of April , 2013, in Tallahassee, Florida.


/s/ Violet Crawford, Clerk

Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Pablo Raya Lopez 667 Oleary Court

Apopka, FL 32712


Green Masters, Inc. c/o Filip Edstrom 1431 East 1st Street Apopka, FL 32703


John D. C. Newton, II, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 4th day of April , 2013.


By: /s/ Clerk of the Commission

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 12-003428
Issue Date Proceedings
Apr. 04, 2013 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Jan. 31, 2013 Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding Respondent's Proposed Exhibits, to the agency.
Jan. 30, 2013 Recommended Order (hearing held January 4, 2013). CASE CLOSED.
Jan. 30, 2013 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jan. 11, 2013 Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jan. 04, 2013 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Dec. 28, 2012 Respondent's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Dec. 26, 2012 Letter to Judge Newton from F. Edstrom enclosing proposed hearing exhibits filed.
Dec. 26, 2012 Letter to Judge Newton from F. Edstrom enclosing list of potential witnesses for hearing filed.
Oct. 29, 2012 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Oct. 29, 2012 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for January 4, 2013; 12:00 p.m.; Orlando and Tallahassee, FL).
Oct. 26, 2012 Respondent's Letter Response to Initial Order filed.
Oct. 19, 2012 Initial Order.
Oct. 19, 2012 Charge of Discrimination filed.
Oct. 19, 2012 Notice of Determination: No Cause filed.
Oct. 19, 2012 Determination: No Cause filed.
Oct. 19, 2012 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.
Oct. 19, 2012 Petition for Relief filed.

Orders for Case No: 12-003428
Issue Date Document Summary
Apr. 04, 2013 Agency Final Order
Jan. 30, 2013 Recommended Order Employee did not prove that employer reduced his wages because of his age. All employees' wages were affected, many negatively, by a comprehensive change in pay structure to link pay to tasks performed. Also, employee was working fewer hours.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer