Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. PETERSON OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, 76-000706 (1976)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 76-000706 Latest Update: Aug. 24, 1977

The Issue Whether the Department of Transportation should is sue a permit under Chapter 479, Florida Statutes, for the subject outdoor advertising sign.

Findings Of Fact An outdoor advertising sign located 9.85 miles east of Volusia County line on Highway 1-4, East, with copy presently reading, "Four Seasons" was cited for violation by the Petitioner, Department of Transportation. Said violation notice was sent to the Respondent, Peterson Outdoor Advertising Company. The sign is located approximately 1200 feet north of State Road 430-A on the east side of 1-4 facing south and bears a 1974 state permit No. 6273-10. It is not disputed that this sign was owned by Rivers Advertising Company and sold by Rivers Advertising Company by Bill of Sale dated June 21, 1974 to the Petitioner, Department of Transportation. The sign did not conform to the requirements of Chapter 479, Florida Statutes, as evidenced by memorandum dated May 1, 1973, Department of Transportation files, Petitioner's Exhibit 1, and upon its sale to the Department was to have been removed by the Department from its location. The payment for the sign amounted to $4,975 which was paid by check to the owner, Rivers Advertising Company. Rivers Advertising Company had leased the real property on which subject sign stood from the property owner, Mr. Gene Berna. Mr. Berna said that Rivers Advertising Company had not paid under their lease agreement at the time that the Petitioner, Department of Transportation, sought to remove the sign subsequent to its purchase from Rivers on June 21, 1974 and would not let the maintenance crew remove the structure. Dandy Signs claimed ownership of the sign by virtue of the fact that Gene Berna sold it to then and that it purchased a renewal 1974 permit tag Number 6273-10-74 and affixed it to the structure. Dandy Signs had never made an application for a permit for subject sign but through error of the Petitioner acquired the permit sign attached to subject sign through the inclusion of it in a regular renewal procedure. Subject sign was not eligible to be permitted under the renewal procedure inasmuch as said sign had been purchased by the State of Florida on June 21, 1974 and Dandy Signs was not eligible for the renewal permit issued because it did not own the sign. Dandy Signs, claiming ownership for the sign through an agreement with the owner of the property on which the sign was located, then "sold" the subject sign by Bill of Sale to the Respondent, Peterson Outdoor Advertising, by an instrument dated May 27, 1975. The proposed Recommended Order filed by the Respondent has been examined and considered in the preparation of this order. The Hearing Officer further finds: The subject sign is owned by the Petitioner. The property owner, Gene Berna, had no title to the subject sign. His only interest was as lessor of the real property. Dandy Signs was on notice that the sign did not belong to the property owner, Gene Berna, and that it belonged to Rivers Outdoor Advertising. Berna told Dandy Signs the subject sign belonged to Rivers. Dandy Signs should not have requested a renewal permit on a sign not previously owned by it and not purchased from the owner. The Petitioner erroneously issued a renewal permit on subject sign upon Dandy's representation it was the owner of the sign. Respondent, Peterson Outdoor Advertising, received no interest in the sign by the alleged Bill of Sale of May, 1975, inasmuch as it did not buy the sign from the owner, the State.

Recommendation Deny the request for a permit. Remove the subject sign which is owned by the Petitioner and should be removed from the roadside. DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of July, 1977, in Tallahassee, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Carlton Building Room 530 Tallahassee, Florida 32304 (904) 488-9675 COPIES FURNISHED: Philip S. Bennett, Esquire Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 William Rowland, Esquire 115 East Morse Boulevard Winter Park, Florida 32789

Florida Laws (1) 479.07
# 2
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. SOUTHERN MOBILE HOMES OF OKEECHOBEE, 88-002801 (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 88-002801 Latest Update: Mar. 01, 1989

The Issue The issue presented for decision herein is whether or not the Respondent's sign was erected and/or maintained in violation of Chapter 479, Florida Statutes, and, if so, whether it should have been removed for not having a state sign permit.

Findings Of Fact Respondent, Southern Mobile Homes of Okeechobee, owns the Otter Creek Acres sign that was erected on the northbound side of Highway 441, U.S. 441, a federal aid primary highway, in Okeechobee County, Florida, 13.17 miles north of Highway 78 (S.R. 78). The sign carried a two face copy approximately 8 x 24 feet, located approximately 100 feet from the highway right-of-way and was visible from the main travel-way of the road. Respondent did not obtain a state sign permit for the sign before it was erected. No state sign permit was obtained after it was erected and maintained although Respondent obtained a county sign permit and attempted to obtain a state permit. Since the area in which the sign is erected is zoned agricultural/conservation, a state permit cannot be issued. Richard Hayford, Petitioner's Outdoor Advertising Inspector for Okeechobee, County, made a routine Inventory of permitted signs in the County on February 25, 1988. At that time, Respondent's sign came under investigation. Respondent's sign was erected without a state sign permit on U.S. 441. Inspector Hayford did not post a Notice of Violation on the sign because, he contends, there was water in a canal between the sign and the highway which made it impossible to post the notice on the sign. Hayford issued a Notice of Violation dated March 7, 1988 which was sent by certified mail to Otter Creek Acres in Okeechobee, Florida, advising that the sign was in violation of Subsection 479.105(1)(a), Florida Statutes, for not having a state permit and indicating removal. Otter Creek Acres is owned by Mr. Edwards' parents and is operated by him in conjunction with Southern Mobile Homes in Okeechobee at the same address. On April 25, 1988, Inspector Hayford posted a Notice of Violation on the sign as the canal was then dry enough for him to post the Notice. On May 2, 1988, the sign was ordered removed by the Department based on the March 7, 1988 violation notice. Edwards erected the sign during September, 1985. When he received the March 7, 1988 Notice of Violation, Edwards contacted Inspector Hayford who provided him with a packet of materials containing a permit application, directions, rules and regulations for outdoor advertising and a copy of Chapter 479, Florida Statutes. Respondent spent $360 for each side of the double sided sign plus taxes to the Sign Stop, an outdoor advertising company in Okeechobee, Florida.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that: 1. The Department of Transportation enter a Final Order finding that Respondent's sign was illegally removed and is entitled to be compensated for such removal in the amount of $756, which amount includes the total amount expended by the Respondent for the erection of the sign in question. DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of March, 1989 in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. JAMES E. BRADWELL Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 1st day of March, 1989. COPIES FURNISHED: Jeffrey K. Edwards, President Southern Mobile Homes of Okeechobee 3801 N.W. 160th Street Okeechobee, Florida 34972 Vernon L. Whittier, Jr., Esquire Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 58 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458 Kaye Henderson, Secretary Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 58 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458 General Counsel Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 58 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458 =================================================================

Florida Laws (5) 120.57120.6835.22479.07479.105
# 3
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs FATHER AND SON MOVING AND STORAGE, 91-006566 (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida Oct. 11, 1991 Number: 91-006566 Latest Update: May 21, 1992

The Issue Whether a sign owned by Respondent and located on the southbound side of I- 95 north of Pembroke Road in Broward County, Florida, violates Chapter 479, Florida Statutes, as alleged in the notice dated August 8, 1991; and if so, what penalty should be imposed.

Findings Of Fact Petitioner is the state agency charged with the duty to administer and enforce the provisions of Chapter 479, Florida Statutes. Chapter 479 regulates outdoor advertising structures along the state highway system. Respondent is the owner of a sign located adjacent to the southbound side of Interstate 95 ("I-95") near Pembroke Road in Broward County, Florida. Respondent maintains the sign on the side of the trailer portion of a so-called 18 wheel tractor-trailer (an "18 wheeler") in a stationary position. No truck or tractor is affixed to the trailer. The sign and 18 wheeler were situated on property owned by Air Stern. Air Stern is an air conditioning company. Petitioner's Outdoor Advertising Inspector (the "inspector") first observed the sign in August, 1991. The sign consisted of a large advertisement affixed to the side of an 18- wheeler which was placed in a stationary location. The message in the advertisement consisted of the words "Father & Son Moving & Storage" and the company's telephone numbers in Broward and Dade counties. The advertising message was clearly visible from I-95. The advertising message was clearly visible from I- 95. A light facing the sign was affixed to the ground and positioned to illuminate the sign on the side of the 18 wheeler at night. An expired 1990 Florida license plate was affixed to the back of the trailer. Grass had grown up around the tires of the trailer and the trailer had been in its same position for several months. The inspector issued a Notice of Violation by physically attaching it to the trailer on August 8, 1991. The inspector determined that the printed advertisement on the trailer's side was an unpermitted sign that violated Section 479.07(1), Florida Statutes. The inspector based his determination upon his observation of the trailer on the premises, its position in relation to I- 95, and the type and content of the message printed on the side. Another copy of the Notice of Violation was mailed to Respondent. After more than 30 days had elapsed with no action by Respondent, Petitioner had the first sign removed by Sal's Towing on September 23, 1991. The sign was stored at Petitioner's maintenance facility in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. On November 9, 1991, Respondent paid the towing charge for removal of the sign and then returned the sign to its original location adjacent to I-95 near Pembroke Road in Broward County, Florida. In addition to placing the sign in its original location, Respondent placed a second sign next to the first sign. The second sign was substantially similar to the first sign. The second sign consisted of a large advertisement affixed to the side of an 18- wheeler which was placed in a stationary position with no truck or tractor attached. The message in the advertisement consisted of the words "Father & Son Moving & Storage" and the company's telephone numbers in Broward and Dade counties. The advertising message was clearly visible from I-95. A sign permit has not been applied for by Respondent nor issued by the Department for either of the signs located adjacent to I-95.

Recommendation Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that Petitioner enter a Final Order finding that Respondent shall have ten days from the date of the Final Order to comply with Notice of Violation No. 4-369 by removing the sign or be subject to the cost of removal and imposition of an administrative fine. DONE and ENTERED this 6th day of April 1992, in Tallahassee, Florida. DANIEL MANRY Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 6th day of April 1992.

Florida Laws (4) 120.57479.01479.07479.16
# 4
LORAINE WAUER AND TONY GLASSFORD vs LAKE DEER MOBILE HAMLET, INC., 11-003880 (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Orlando, Florida Aug. 02, 2011 Number: 11-003880 Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2024
# 5
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. INDIAN RIVER BEVERAGE, INC., 77-001386 (1977)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 77-001386 Latest Update: Feb. 02, 1978

Findings Of Fact A notice was sent to the Respondent on the 11th day of May, 1977, alleging violation of Section 479.07(1), 479.11(1), Florida Statutes, for the reason that the sign owned by the Respondent had no permit attached thereto and was located within 15 feet of the right of way of the secondary road. Respondent's sign is painted on a guard rail which had been erected in front of the residence which stood at the east/west end of the intersection or "T" of State Road 707 and State Road 707A. The copy on the sign which was in two parts read: "Indian River Beverage Deli Take-out Catering" and a telephone number "333-5600--1 1/2 miles South" with an arrow indicating a southerly direction. The immediate area of the residence protected by the guard rail includes a parking lot and a trailer park. The sign advertises the business of the Respondent located 1 1/2 miles from the zone. The sign is approximately 6 feet from the edge of the pavement of the secondary road. No permit was applied for or secured before the sign was painted on the guard rail. Petitioner contends that the sign must be removed inasmuch as it sits less than 15 feet from the edge of the paved secondary road and that no permit was applied for or secured. Respondent contends that he assumed that the owner of the guard rail had gotten a permit to erect the guard rail and that the guard rail was erected to protect the house inasmuch as the house had been invaded by traveling automobiles seven times in seven years. He further contended that the sign was all dirty and rusty, and he made an agreement with the owner of the property to paint the sign and that it was sandblasted, cleaned up and painted in white and made traveling on the state road safer as well as advertising his establishment.

Recommendation Remove the sign unless it has been removed within five (5) days after final order is issued. DONE and ENTERED this 19th day of December, 1977, in Tallahassee, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 (904) 488-9675 COPIES FURNISHED: Philip S. Bennett, Esquire Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Mr. O. E. Black, Administrator Outdoor Advertising Section Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Martin K. Hawthorne Indian River Beverage, Inc. 2222 Indian River Drive Jensen Beach, Florida 33457

Florida Laws (3) 479.07479.11479.111
# 7
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. JOHN AND JUANITA DILL, 75-001936 (1975)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-001936 Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1977

Findings Of Fact Objections to time involved in the Notice of Hearing was wavied by the parties. The parties were present. Respondent admitted that he had erected a sign near State Road 71, 1 8/10 miles south of the Calhoun County county line, with copy: Cypress Lodge - Fish Camp - Motel, a double faced sign. He admitted that he had no permits for 1974, 1975 nor for the current year. Respondent admitted that he had made no application to the Petitioner, Florida Department of Transportation, before employing a man to erect the sign. Respondent had no written lease agreement with the owners of the property upon which the sign is erected. The Petitioner claims a 33 foot right of way by maintenance and there is no controversy as to whether the State actually owns the 33 foot right of way it claims by maintenance although the State has no deed for said right of way. The subject sign is 12 feet from the nearest edge of the 33 foot right of way claimed by the State. Said 12 feet is 3 feet less than the required 15 feet from the nearest edge of the right of way of State Road 71.

Conclusions RECOMMENDATION: Inasmuch as the violation is the difference between 12 feet and 15 feet and the reerection of subject signs would destroy a wooded area; and the secondary road is now cluttered with nonconforming signs'. and it is the testimony of the owner that he intends to remove and redo the subject signs eventually but not this year; it is recommended that a permit be issued for subject signs upon payment of permit fees for the past years and upon a date certain after 1976 for removal of subject signs. The Department adopts the Findings of Fact and the Conclusions of Law of the Hearing Officer, but is unable to accept her Recommendation that the sign be permitted to remain in place. Once the determination is made that the subject sign violates the setback requirements of Chapter 479, Florida Statutes, it becomes the duty of the Department to follow the provisions of the law and order the Sign removed. IT IS ORDERED, therefore, that the subject sign be removed thirty-five (35) days from the date of mailing a copy of this Order to Respondent, provided no petition for review of this Order has been filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, in which event thus Order will be stayed. IT IS ORDERED this 18th day of January, 1977. TOM WEBB, JR. SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HAYDON BURNS BUILDING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA Copies furnished: Philip S. Bennett, Attorney Office of Legal Operations Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building John W. Scruggs, Attorney District III Office Department of Transportation Chipley, Florida Delphene C. Strickland, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings Department of Administration Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 John C. Dill Route 3, Box 172 Wewahitchka, Florida 32465 Mr. O. E. Black, Administrator Outdoor Advertising Section Right of Way Bureau Department of Transportation Tallahassee, Florida

Recommendation Inasmuch as the violation is the difference between 12 feet and 15 feet and the reerection of subject signs would destroy a wooded area; and the secondary road is now cluttered with nonconforming signs; and it is the testimony of the owner that he intends to remove and redo the subject signs eventually but not this year; it is recommended that a permit be issued for subject signs upon payment of permit fees for the past years and upon a date certain after 1976 for removal of subject signs. DONE and ORDERED this 13th day of May, 1976. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 (904) 488-9675 COPIES FURNISHED: John W. Scruggs, Jr., Esquire Philip S. Bennett, Esquire Staff Attorney Office of Legal Operations Department of Transportation Department of Transportation Chipley, Florida Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 John C. Dill, Respondent Route 3, Box 172 Mr. J.E. Jordan Wewahitchka, Florida 32465 District Sign Coordinator Department of Transportation Post Office Box 607, US Highway 90 Chipley, Florida 32428 ================================================================= AGENCY FINAL ORDER ================================================================= STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW Petitioner, AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED vs. CASE NO. 75-1936T JOHN AND JUANITA DILL, Respondent. /

Florida Laws (2) 479.07479.11
# 8
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. LYMAN WALKER, III, 77-000001 (1977)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 77-000001 Latest Update: Apr. 20, 1977

The Issue Whether the Respondent violated Chapter 479, Florida Statutes, by failure to obtain a state permit and whether Respondent is in violation of federal and state laws, rules and regulations applicable to outdoor advertising signs concerning setback and spacing restrictions.

Findings Of Fact A notice of alleged violation of Chapter 479 and Section 335.13 and Section 339.301, Florida Statutes, and notice to show cause was furnished Petitioner by certified mail dated the 16th day of December, 1976, and stamped at the Lamont, Florida Post Office December 18, 1976. The following signs are the subject of this hearing: A sign with copy reading "Pecans 3-lbs. $1.50" with an additional sign attached underneath reading "53.9" located at 1 and 6/10 miles west of Madison County line on Highway Interstate 10. A sign with copy reading "Pecans Fresh Shell $1.99) located 1 and 9/10 miles west of Madison County line on Highway Interstate 10. A sign with copy reading "Pecans 3-lbs. $1.50" located 2 miles west of Madison County line on Highway Interstate 10. A sign with copy reading "Exit Now Pecans Fresh Shell $1.99" located 2.05 miles west of Madison County line on Highway Interstate 10. A sign with copy reading "Exit Now Pecans 3-lbs. $1.50" located 2.2 miles west of Madison County line on Highway Interstate 10. No permits were secured for any of the signs which were erected subsequent to December, 1976, and visible from Highway Interstate 10 on the north side thereof. Each sign is outside an urban area. The distance and space between signs numbers 2, 3, 4 and 5 each is less than one thousand feet. Sign number 1 has the number 53.9 underneath the message advertising pecans. This number relates to the price of gasoline sold at Respondent's store wherein he sells gasoline and pecans among other things. Sign number 1 is approximately 15 feet from the fence line at the north boundary of 1-10; sign number 2 is located approximately 15 feet from the fence line on the north boundary of 1-10; sign number 3 is located approximately 15 feet from the fence line on the north boundary of 1-10; sign number 4 is located approximately 15 feet from the right-of-way line, the fence, on the north side of 1-10; sign number 5 is approximately 2 feet from the fence line on the north side of 1-10. Sign number 5 is within the offramp section of the interchange of 1-10 and State Road 257. The subject signs stand fully visible approximately 15 feet from the fence which is the north boundary line of Interstate 10 a federal aid primary highway except sign number 5 which is less than 15 feet from Interstate 10. They are placed in an old grove in which there are less than 20 old pecan trees which do not produce the product advertised for sale. The subject signs advertise pecans that are sold at the business of Respondent which is a distance of at least 3/4 of a mile from the nearest sign.

Recommendation Take such action as the law permits including but not limited to the removal of subject signs. DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of March, 1977, at Tallahassee, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Carlton Building Room 530 Tallahassee, Florida 32304 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 30th day of March, 1977. COPIES FURNISHED: Philip S. Bennett, Esquire Ben H. Ervin, Esquire George L. Waas, Esquire 850 South Waukeenah Street Department of Transportation Monticello, Florida 32344 Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Mr. O. E. Black, Administrator Outdoor Advertising Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Mr. J. E. Jordan District Sign Coordinator, DOT Post Office Box 607 Chipley, Florida 32428 ================================================================= AGENCY FINAL ORDER ================================================================= STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN RE: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner, vs. CASE NO. 77-001T LYMAN WALKER, III, Respondent. /

Florida Laws (5) 120.68479.02479.07479.11479.16
# 9
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. BLUE WATERS MOTEL AND CASIMIR AND IRENE MISKA, 79-000990 (1979)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 79-000990 Latest Update: May 04, 1982

Findings Of Fact Two signs advertising Blue Waters Motel and located in the vicinity of said motel are located in the right-of-way of Highway US 1. The location of these signs was fixed by a survey conducted by a Florida registered land surveyor with reference to official Department of Transportation right-of-way maps developed from the official court records of property ownership.

Recommendation Having shown the subject signs to be in violation of Section 479.11(6), Florida Statutes, the Department of Transportation should give the owner of the signs 30 days to remove the signs. If the signs are not removed within that time period, the Department should remove the signs from its right-of-way. DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of April, 1982, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. STEPHEN F. DEAN, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 8th day of April, 1982. COPIES FURNISHED: Charles G. Gardner, Esquire Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Ms. Jane Cerchio c/o Cerchio Drive and Rifle Camp Road West Paterson, New Jersey 07424 and c/o Blue Waters Motel 222 Overseas Highway, MM48 Marathon, Florida 33050 Paul N. Pappas, Secretary Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301

Florida Laws (2) 120.57479.11
# 10

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer