Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs JACQUELYN M. EREMITA, R.N., 19-005184PL (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Orange Park, Florida Sep. 27, 2019 Number: 19-005184PL Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
# 2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs MARLENE MARRERO, R.N., 19-006637PL (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami, Florida Dec. 17, 2019 Number: 19-006637PL Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
# 3
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs DELORES ANN HOLTON, 01-002486PL (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Clearwater, Florida Jun. 26, 2001 Number: 01-002486PL Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
# 4
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs PAUL V. GHIGLIOTTI, L.P.N., 16-002073PL (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:St. Petersburg, Florida Apr. 15, 2016 Number: 16-002073PL Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
# 5
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs JESSICA TEDESCHI, C.N.A., 18-001645PL (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Clearwater, Florida Mar. 29, 2018 Number: 18-001645PL Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
# 6
# 7
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs JEOVANNI HECHAVARRIA, R.N., 20-004977PL (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Fort Myers, Florida Nov. 13, 2020 Number: 20-004977PL Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
# 8
BOARD OF NURSING vs. MICHAEL J. HANLY, 88-005835 (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 88-005835 Latest Update: Jul. 05, 1989

Findings Of Fact Based upon the testimony of the witnesses and the documentary evidence received at the hearing, I make the following findings of fact: At all times material to the allegations of the. administrative complaint, Respondent, Michael James Hanly, was a licensed registered nurse, license no. RN 78035-2. On or about November 18, 1987, the Board of Nursing entered a final order regarding disciplinary action against this Respondent. The final order found the Respondent guilty of improper conduct and specified the following penalties: The licensee shall pay an administrative fine of $500.00 within 6 months. The licensee is hereby placed on PROBATION for a period of two years, subject to the following terms and conditions: The licensee shall not violate any Federal or State law, nor any rule or order of the Board of Nursing. The licensee shall submit written reports to the Board, which contain the licensee's name, license number, current address, current employer's name, address and telephone number, and a statement by the licensee describing his nursing employment and performance These reports shall be submitted quarterly, as scheduled by the Board probation section. The licensee shall enroll in and successfully complete, in addition to normally required continuing education courses, courses in the following subject areas: medical ethical considerations and legal aspects of nursing within six (6) months from the filing of this Order. * * * While employed as a nurse, the licensee shall be responsible for causing reports to be furnished by his employer to the Board; these reports shall set out the licensee's current position, work assignment, level of performance, and any problems. The reports shall be submitted every three months as scheduled by-the Board probation section. If employed otherwise than as a nurse, the licensee shall report the position, employer and place of employment to the Board section on the scheduled quarterly dates. If not employed, the licensee shall so notify the Board probation section on the scheduled quarterly dates. Any deviation from the requirements of this probation without the prior written consent of the Board shall constitute a violation of this probation. Subsequent to the entry of the final order, the Respondent did not submit reports, did not complete the continuing education, and did not pay the administrative fine. On June 10, 1988, the Department wrote to the Respondent to notify him that the terms of the final order had not been met. This letter was received by the Respondent on June 14, 1988. On June 29, 1988, the Department again wrote to the Respondent to advise him that he was delinquent and in violation of the final order. This letter was received by the Respondent on July 12, 1988. Upon receipt of the correspondence described in paragraph 3, Respondent replied to the Department by stating that the matters addressed in the final order were on appeal to the district court of appeal. The Respondent did not pay the administrative fine nor seek additional time within which to comply with the remaining terms of the final order. Finally, the Department wrote to Respondent on July 22, 1988, acknowledged that the final order had been appealed, but informed Respondent that he was required to comply with the final order unless a stay were entered by the appellate court. Respondent did not obtain a stay from the appellate court and, as of the date of the hearing, had not complied with the terms of the final order entered November 18, 1987.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing, it is RECOMMENDED: That the Board of Nursing enter a final order which finds Respondent guilty of the violation alleged in the administrative complaint, imposes an administrative fine in the amount of $250, and lengthens the period of Respondent's probation to four years. DONE and ENTERED this 5th day of July, 1989, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. Hearings Hearings JOYOUS D. PARRISH Hearing Officer Division of Administrative The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904)488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative this 5th day of July, 1989. APPENDIX TO THE RECOMMENDED ORDER RULINGS ON THE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT SUBMITTED BY THE DEPARTMENT: Paragraphs 1 and 2 are accepted. With regard to paragraph 3, it is accepted that the Respondent filed an appeal which was assigned case no. 88- 1069; whether that appeal was timely or complied with the provisions of Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, is unknown and not a part of this record. It is accepted that the parties, for purposes of the hearing, believed the appeal to be proper. Paragraphs 4 through 11 are accepted. The Respondent did not submit proposed findings of fact. An ex parte communication was submitted on June 19, 1989, which is rejected as argument, irrelevant or contrary to the weight of the credible evidence. COPIES FURNISHED: Michael A. Mone' Senior Attorney Department of Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe, Suite 60 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0729 M. James Hanly, R.N. Post Office Box 1472 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 Kenneth Easley General Counsel Department of Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe, Suite 60 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0729

Florida Laws (2) 120.68464.018
# 9

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer