The Issue The issue in this case is whether Reshnaya E. Francois suffered a birth-related injury as defined by section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, for which compensation should be awarded under the Plan.
Findings Of Fact Reshnaya E. Francois was born on January 31, 2016, at Broward Health, in Coral Springs, Florida. Reshnaya weighed in excess of 2,500 grams at birth. The circumstances of the labor, delivery, and birth of the minor child are reflected in the medical records of Broward Health submitted with the Petition. At all times material, both Broward Health and Dr. Wajid were active members under NICA pursuant to sections 766.302(6) and (7). Reshnaya was delivered by Dr. Wajid, who was a NICA- participating physician, on January 31, 2016. Petitioners contend that Reshnaya suffered a birth- related neurological injury and seek compensation under the Plan. Respondent contends that Reshnaya has not suffered a birth- related neurological injury as defined by section 766.302(2). In order for a claim to be compensable under the Plan, certain statutory requisites must be met. Section 766.309 provides: The Administrative Law Judge shall make the following determinations based upon all available evidence: Whether the injury claimed is a birth- related neurological injury. If the claimant has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the Administrative Law Judge, that the infant has sustained a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury and that the infant was thereby rendered permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired, a rebuttable presumption shall arise that the injury is a birth-related neurological injury as defined in § 766.302(2). Whether obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital; or by a certified nurse midwife in a teaching hospital supervised by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital. How much compensation, if any, is awardable pursuant to § 766.31. If the Administrative Law Judge determines that the injury alleged is not a birth-related neurological injury or that obstetrical services were not delivered by a participating physician at birth, she or he shall enter an order . . . . The term “birth-related neurological injury” is defined in Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, as: . . . injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams for a single gestation or, in the case of a multiple gestation, a live infant weighing at least 2,000 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. This definition shall apply to live births only and shall not include disability or death caused by genetic or congenital abnormality. (Emphasis added). In the instant case, NICA has retained Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), as its medical expert specializing in maternal-fetal medicine and pediatric neurology. Upon examination of the pertinent medical records, Dr. Willis opined: The newborn was not depressed. Apgar scores were 8/8. Decreased movement of the right arm was noted. The baby was taken to the Mother Baby Unit and admission exam described the baby as alert and active. The baby had an Erb’s palsy or Brachial Plexus injury of the right arm. Clinical appearance of the baby suggested Down syndrome. Chromosome analysis was done for clinical features suggestive of Down syndrome and this genetic abnormality was confirmed. Chromosome analysis was consistent with 47, XX+21 (Down syndrome). Dr. Willis’s medical Report is attached to his Affidavit. His Affidavit reflects his ultimate opinion that: In summary: Delivery was complicated by a mild shoulder dystocia and resulting Erb’s palsy. There was no evidence of injury to the spinal cord. The newborn was not depressed. Apgar scores were 8/9. Chromosome analysis was consistent with Down syndrome. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. The baby has a genetic or chromosome abnormality, Down syndrome. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis. The opinion of Dr. Willis that Reshnaya did not suffer an obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery, or the immediate post-delivery period is credited. In the instant case, NICA has retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), as its medical expert in pediatric neurology. Upon examination of the child and the pertinent medical records, Dr. Duchowny opined: In summary, Reshnaya’s examination today reveals findings consistent with Down syndrome including multiple dysmorphic features, hypotonia, and hyporeflexia. She has minimal weakness at the right shoulder girdle and her delayed motor milestones are likely related to her underlying genetic disorder. There are no focal or lateralizing features suggesting a structural brain injury. Dr. Duchowny’s medical report is attached to his Affidavit. His Affidavit reflects his ultimate opinion that: Neither the findings on today’s evaluation nor the medical record review indicate that Reshnaya has either a substantial mental or motor impairment acquired in the course of labor or delivery. I believe that her present neurological disability is more likely related to Downs syndrome. For this reason, I am not recommending that Reshnaya be considered for compensation within the NICA program. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Duchowny. The opinion of Dr. Duchowny that Reshnaya did not suffer a substantial mental or motor impairment acquired in the course of labor or delivery is credited.
The Issue The issue in this case is whether Jacob McGowan (Jacob) suffered a birth-related injury as defined by section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Jacob was born on July 2, 2015, at Shands at the University of Florida (Shands), Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida. The pregnancy, labor, and delivery of his mother, Christy Gonzalez, were managed by employees of UF Health Physicians and employees of Shands. At all times material, both the hospital and the physicians group were active members under NICA pursuant to sections 766.302(6) and (7). Christy Gonzalez, age 32, presented to Shands on July 1, 2015. This was her second pregnancy. Ms. Gonzalez's prior pregnancy resulted in an emergency cesarean section at 37 weeks after a failed induction/arrest of labor due to gestational hypertension. Based on orders given by OBGYN Georgia Graham, M.D., Christy Gonzalez was admitted to the Labor and Delivery Suite at approximately 12:05 p.m. Ms. Gonzalez was started on Pitocin at 2:47 p.m. for induction/augmentation. Labor progressed slowly over the next approximate 30 hours during which time Ms. Gonzalez continued on Pitocin and exhibited several periods of ongoing and apparent uncontrolled maternal hypertension. Fetal heart monitoring started at 8:13 a.m. on July 1, 2015, and, as labor progressed, the fetal heart rate pattern demonstrated accelerations, and late and early/variable decelerations. The fetal heart rate reached 90 and below at numerous points throughout the day on July 1, 2015, including at 9:34 a.m., 9:54 a.m., 11:04 a.m., 11:10 a.m., 1:05-1:48 p.m. (multiple decelerations), 2:11-2:15 p.m., 2:16-2:18 p.m., 2:31 p.m., and 9:36-9:38 p.m. On July 2, 2015, the fetal heart rate continued to demonstrate accelerations and decelerations with "High FHR" noted at 8:56 p.m. (156/67), as well as 9:15 p.m. and 9:21 p.m. The fetal monitor strips indicate prolonged periods of fetal distress throughout this long period of labor. At approximately 11:00 p.m. on July 2, 2015, Ms. Gonzalez was taken into the operating room for emergency cesarean section due to decreased variability and repetitive decelerations in the fetal heart rate. Jacob was born a live infant at 11:42 p.m. on July 2, 2015. Jacob was a single gestation, weighing 4,366 grams at birth. Jacob was delivered by Dr. Anushka Chelliah, who was a NICA participating physician on July 2, 2015. Petitioner contends that Jacob suffered a birth-related neurological injury and seeks compensation under the NICA Plan. Respondent contends that Jacob has not suffered a birth-related neurological injury as defined by section 766.302(2). Jacob was born via cesarean section secondary to failed induction and vaginal birth after cesarean section, and non- reassuring fetal heart rate tracing and nuchal cord. Jacob was delivered with no respiratory effort and a heart rate less than 60. Post-birth resuscitation included tactile stimulation, intubation, suctioning, and positive pressure ventilation. His Apgar scores were 1 at one minute, 3 at five minutes and 4 at 10 minutes. Physical examination at birth revealed he was pale, had poor tone and negative grasp, and poor moro and suck reflexes. Following color change and rise in his heart rate and increasing oxygen saturations, Jacob was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for further management. Initial assessment of Jacob included intrapartum fetal asphyxia, chorioamnionitis affecting fetus or newborn, meconium aspiration, injury to scalp secondary to birth trauma, respiratory failure of newborn, and HIE (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy) for which HIE protocol for cooling was initiated. Upon arrival to the NICU, Jacob was initially placed on a conventional ventilator with oxygen saturations in the upper 80s. He was quickly transitioned to a high frequency ventilator/oscillator with excellent response. Jacob’s initial blood gas showed good ventilation and medical personnel were able to sequentially wean his amplitude, and he was started on 100-percent oxygen. He was passively cooled until three hours of life when active cooling was started. By 12:46 a.m., physical examination showed a more reassuring neurological examination, although high risk for seizures and neurologic sequelae was noted. Physical examination at four hours of life revealed Jacob was pink, alert, reacting appropriately to stimulation, reactive to light, had a positive suck reflex, gag reflex, mildly increased tone in all extremities, reflexes of 3+ in his lower extremities, 2+ in his upper extremities, slow grasp in feet and brisk grasp in hands. Jacob was discharged from the hospital on August 10, 2015 (day of life 39). His hospital course was complicated by glucose and electrolyte derangements, adrenal hemorrhage, seizures, hypotension, coagulopathy, E coli sepsis with presumed meningitis and poor feeding. The hospital discharge summary reflects that he was actively moving all extremities, had received antibiotics secondary to E coli sepsis and suspect meningitis, was weaned from the ventilator to a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP) at five days of life and had been stable on room air since July 11, 2015, was discharged with 10 mg of phenobarbital every 12 hours, that a physical exam revealed a mildly hypotonic normal male and that he had been on full oral feeding since August 3, 2015, with an appropriate weight gain pattern at discharge. The neurological status section of the hospital discharge summary reflects that Jacob's initial MRI on July 6, 2015, showed evidence of frontal and occipital cortical and subcortical injury globally. A repeat MRI on July 12, 2015, showed improvement in cortical injury with some evidence of injury over the head of the left caudate. He initially had seizure activity on EEG and was loaded with phenobarbital. The last two continuous EEGs on July 11, 2015, and July 16, 2015, however, showed no seizure activity, and the plan was to allow him to outgrow his phenobarbital dose. On August 12, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time difficulty breast feeding was reported by the mother. The pediatrician noted "no obvious developmental delays or difficulties" and "great tone." Counseling was given on breast feeding and feeding, and orders were given for evaluation and treatment by ophthalmology and occupational therapy. On August 24, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for sores in his mouth and feeding problems, and fussiness with spit up and vomiting in preceding days. He was on no medications at this time. His physical exam was normal. Neurological exam was also normal with present and normal newborn reflexes noted. "Great weight gain" was noted. Counseling was given concerning gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and feeding. On September 3, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time, his mother was curious as to whether he needed therapy for motor development. He was noted to be feeding well and complete resolution of his GERD symptoms was noted. Medications at that time included only ranitidine syrup (a stomach acid reducer). All areas of development were noted to be normal for his age and a physical examination, including neurological examination, were also normal. The pediatrician noted in assessment that although the mother reported a diagnosis of brain damage, her concerns regarding motor skills were not apparent, as Jacob was noted to be moving well, trying to roll, could lift his head, and was grasping a rattle in his stroller--all of which were noted to be "very impressive for 2 months." On October 29, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician with complaints of right ear pain and discharge, low-grade fever, tugging at his ear, and fussiness. Medications at this time included only ranitidine syrup. A physical exam was normal with the exception of crusty discharge noted in his ears. He was prescribed antibiotics and ranitidine was refilled. On November 10, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician with complaints of congestion and ear drainage. There were no concerns with Jacob's feeding at this time, and he was noted to eat baby food and use a bottle. Medications at this time included only ranitidine syrup. His physical exam was normal with the exception of erythematous noted in both ears. Antibiotics were prescribed. On November 23, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time Jacob was taking ranitidine daily for GERD and was in physical therapy/occupational therapy for delayed milestones and trouble sucking. He was noted to be eating solid foods since three months of age, eating baby food, and using a bottle. Ranitidine was refilled. "All areas of development are appropriate for age" was noted. A physical exam was normal. Plans for future care included continued use of ranitidine for GERD, continued therapies for delayed milestones, and a referral to otolaryngology for audiometry. On January 6, 2016, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a six-month follow-up visit. At this time it was noted that he was getting occupational and physical therapy weekly. It was also noted that he had been diagnosed with hand, foot, and mouth disease and had spots in his throat and discharge from his right ear. The only medication at this time was ranitidine, which was refilled. No concerns with his nutrition were noted. Developmental history testing revealed a “pass” in all areas, except difficulty rolling left to right and sitting alone. Allergic rhinitis symptoms were noted, however, a physical exam was normal. Plans for future care on this visit included referral for a failed hearing screening, continued ranitidine, and continued occupational therapy. At the request of NICA, Donald C. Willis, M.D., who is board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology and maternal-fetal medicine, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through E. In his report dated August 10, 2016, Dr. Willis opined that, [t]here was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted in brain injury. I am unable to comment about the severity of the brain injury. At the request of NICA, Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D., who is board-certified in neurology, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through E, and performed a thorough examination of Jacob on August 31, 2016. Dr. Sigurdardottir's report, dated August 31, 2016, reveals that Jacob's mother gave an "excellent history and timeline of the pregnancy with Jacob, his birth, and aftermath." Jacob's developmental history is reported by Dr. Sigurdardottir to include walking independently between 11 and 12 months of age; speaking five words; and report by mother of some hand tremors when reaching for objects. Jacob is noted to have been weaned from phenobarbital at six months of age and he has had no further seizure activity. Dr. Sigurdardottir's neurological exam revealed a pleasant and interactive boy interested in his surroundings. His motor exam revealed symmetric, normal muscle tone and equal use of both extremities. His gait was symmetric and seemed age appropriate. His reflexes were present and at times slightly increased, but never spread from right to left. Balance and coordination were noted to be difficult to fully assess, but seemed to be within normal limits for his age. He manipulated toys in a conventional manner with no autistic characteristics or repetitive behaviors seen. Dr. Sigurdardottir noted that Jacob had made a remarkable recovery and that there were no obvious abnormalities noted upon neurologic exam. Dr. Sigurdardottir concluded her report with her opinions that, The patient is found to have no substantial physical and/or mental impairment at this time. Jacob did have a neurological injury to the brain due to oxygen deprivation, and his hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy is felt to be birth related. At this time, Jacob's prognosis for life expectancy and full recovery is good. Petitioner did not submit or introduce into evidence any expert reports rebutting the opinions of Dr. Willis or Dr. Sigurdardottir.
The Issue At issue in the proceeding is whether Daniel Sicard, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact As observed in the preliminary statement, neither Petitioners nor anyone on their behalf appeared at hearing, and no proof was offered to support their claim. Respondent, in light of such failure, declined the opportunity to offer any evidence. Consequently, there being no proof, it cannot be factually resolved whether Daniel Sicard, a minor, suffered a "birth-related neurological injury" as alleged in the claim for benefits.
The Issue Whether Ashley Villarreal has suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as alleged in the claim for compensation.
Findings Of Fact Preliminary matters Ashley Villarreal (Ashley) is the natural daughter of Roy Villarreal and Carmen Luna. She was born a live infant on January 2, 1989, at Bethesda Memorial Hospital in Palm Beach County, Florida, and her birth weight was 3090 grams. The physician delivering obstetrical services during the birth of Ashley was Allen Dinnerstein, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. The birth of Ashley Villarreal At or about 4:15 p.m., January 2, 1989, Carmen Luna was admitted to Bethesda Memorial Hospital. At the time, Carmen Luna was in active labor, and Ashley was post term with a gestational age of 41 weeks. Otherwise, Carmen Luna's pregnancy had been without complication. External fetal monitoring was commenced at 4:50 p.m. and indicated that the fetal heart tone was sporadically within the 60 beat per minute level, with a slow return to baseline; a level sufficient to indicate occasional fetal bradycardia and fetal distress. 1/ This situation evidenced a need for surgical intervention, and at 5:20 p.m. Carmen Luna was taken to the operating room. Anesthesia commenced at 5:25 p.m., a cesarean section surgical procedure was commenced at 5:39 p.m., and Ashley was delivered at 5:44 p.m. The operative report reflects that the following occurred during the course of the procedure: . . . a transverse incision was made into the uterus releasing meconium stained fluid. The vertex was delivered and the baby suctioned with DeLee. A loop of cord over the neck was removed and the baby then delivered completely continually being suctioned as the cord was double clamped and severed and the infant given to the neonatologist for care . . . . The delivery records likewise reflect that Ashley had a blue appearance at delivery, the presence of meconium staining, and the following resuscitation measures: "Stimulation," "Bulb Suction," "DeLee Suction," "Mech Suction" and "Whiffs Oz." When delivered, Ashley presented Apgar scores of 6 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. These scores are a numerical expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of the heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through a maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Ashley's Apgar score totaled 6, with respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, heart rate and muscle tone being graded at 1 each, and color being graded at 0. At 5 minutes, Ashley's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, and muscle tone and color at 1 each. Such total scores could be characterized by an obstetrician as "good." Pertinent to this case, color, heart rate and respiratory effort are primarily related to the cardiovascular system, and color is the least significant indicator of an infant's brain or neurological status at birth. The categories of reflex irritability and muscle tone are, however, neurological assessments, which offer the greatest insight into the neurological condition of an infant at birth. Ashley's Apgar scores relative to those categories which reflect neurological status at birth were collectively a total of 3 out of a possible 4 at both 1 and 5 minutes. Under the circumstances, Ashley's Apgar scores, either globally or discretely, fail to reflect a hypoxic event at birth. At 6:00 p.m., following delivery, Ashley was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit due to respiratory distress, possibly secondary to meconium aspiration. Ashley was accorded extra oxygen, via oxygen hood, for two days, and her meconium aspiration was successfully treated with antibiotics. During her admission, no clinical observations were noted that one would typically expect in a child undergoing hypoxic encephalopathy, and no neurological consult was ordered. 2/ On January 7, 1989, Ashley was discharged as an apparently well baby. Subsequent developments On July 29, 1989, Ashley was seen by M. Arenstein, D.O., for a "well baby visit," and no abnormalities were noted; however, on September 6, 1989, Ashley was again seen by Dr. Arenstein at which time the parents expressed their concern regarding Ashley "not sitting up, crawling, etc." Consequently, Dr. Arenstein referred Ashley for a pediatric consult with Jeffrey Perelman, M.D. Ashley was seen by Dr. Perelman on September 19, 1989, and he diagnosed her as developmentally delayed, and ultimately referred her to David Ross, M.D., for a neurological evaluation. Dr. Ross saw Ashley on July 2, 1990, and concluded: The patient has some mild facial dysmorphism with developmental delay in all fields associated with an abnormal neurologic exam with persistence of postural reflexes and hyperreflexia. The spectrum of findings is consistent with mental retardation of a mild to moderate degree probably due to cerebral palsy. 3/ Dr. Ross' ultimate diagnosis was mental retardation, and he recommended that Ashley have a full evaluation, including "an image of the brain either with CT scan or MRI (an EEG, torch titers, chromosome analysis)." Ashley was referred in August 1990, for a CT brain scan and an EEG. The CT scan is a neuroimaging study which can identify structural brain abnormalities occasioned by an hypoxic insult, as well as other causes. The EEG is a device used to detect abnormalities of the electrical currents of the brain such as seizure activity, which is often a manifestation of hypoxic insult at birth, and the death of neuronal cells. Here, both the CT scan and EEG were within normal limits. Ashley continued to be treated by Dr. Perelman through June 1991; however, on August 14, 1991, she came under the care of Miguel Simo, M.D., another pediatrician, because the parents were apparently dissatisfied with Dr. Perelman. Upon examination, Dr. Simo diagnosed Ashley as developmentally delayed, and referred her to Laszlo Mate', M.D., a physician practicing child neurology, for evaluation. Dr. Mate' examined Ashley on August 29, 1991, and observed: . . . a small, dysmorphic female in no apparent distress. Her head circumference is 47 cm which is in the 25th percentile. She doesn't have any neurocutaneous abnormalities. Her palmer creases are somewhat abnormal, but not of simian nature. Her fingers are slightly abnormal, extra long, and she seems to have a proximal displacement of both thumbs. Her ears are malformed with very small earlobes. The ears are somewhat posterior rotated and low set. Her eyes are almond shape but in view of her Indian heritage, that's probably normal. Both parents seem to have similar shaped eyes. The child has a somewhat prominent nose. The mouth is somewhat fishmouth in character and she has fairly shallow temporal area. She doesn't have any eyelashes on her lower eyelid. Dr. Mate's impression was: This is a markedly abnormal child with a developmental quotient in the 30's. She's currently is 30 months old and she functions around a 9-10 month level. She has multiple minor malformations which made the diagnosis of cerebral palsy somewhat unlikely. I suspect we are dealing with some prenatal etiology, either genetic or pregnancy related. 4/ Dr. Simo also referred Ashley for an MRI of the brain. An MRI, as with a CT scan, is a neuroimaging study which can identify structural abnormalities occasioned by hypoxic insult, as well as other causes. The MRI, performed September 20, 1991, was abnormal, evidencing "poor and decreased white matter myelinization extending to the frontal, occipital, and parietal cortex and decrease in white matter content in the centrum semiovale." Such damage could be reflective of birth asphyxia, developmental immaturity of the brain, or a myriad of other causes. Finally, Dr. Simo referred Ashley to Oscar Febles, M.D., a physician practicing genetics. Dr. Febles examined Ashley on November 1, 1991, and rendered a diagnosis of "psychomotor retardation of unknown etiology." Concluding, Dr. Febles observed: The clinical findings in this patient are not diagnostic of a particular genetic syndrome . . . In conclusion, this patient presents a clinical picture characterized by psychomotor retardation that cannot be diagnosed on the clinical findings and/or testing done. The fact that she presents diffuse demyelinization on the MRI would favor the diagnosis of cerebral palsy and/or a CNS degenerative disease. It is my recommendation that an MRI be repeated in approximately 6 months to see if the demyelinization process of the cortex previously seen is progressive or static. If found to be progressive it would indicate a CNS degenerative disease (e.g. leukodystrophies) and if static the diagnosis of cerebral palsy is most likely. In addition, it is also recommended . . . Genetic re-evaluation in 1 year. Whether, consistent with Dr. Febles' recommendation, an MRI was repeated or Ashley had a subsequent genetic re- evaluation does not appear of record. Notably, however, while Ashley was genetically tested and found to have a normal karyotype, such test does not rule out the preponderance of genetic disorders which manifest themselves in microscopic point mutations within a chromosome as opposed to total chromosomal malformation. The medical experts at hearing As to whether Ashley had sustained permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of an injury to her brain resulting from oxygen deprivation during the course of labor, delivery or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period, petitioners offered the testimony of Dr. David Ross, who, although a board certified neurologist, does not regularly treat neonates. Dr. Ross examined Ashley on July 2, 1990, and March 2, 1994. It was Dr. Ross' opinion that Ashley suffered a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment as a consequence of oxygen deprivation during the course of labor and delivery. Compared with the opinion of Dr. Ross, the respondent offered the testimony of Dr. Michael Duchowny. Dr. Duchowny is a child neurologist who is board certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology and clinical neurophysiology. Dr. Duchowny is associated with the department of neurology at Miami Children's Hospital and routinely treats neonates suspected of having suffered a hypoxic event at birth. Dr. Duchowny examined Ashley on September 21, 1992, as well as observed her at hearing, and was familiar, as was Dr. Ross, with the pertinent medical records. It was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Ashley was substantially and permanently mentally impaired, but that her physical impairment could best be described as mild to moderate. As to causation, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that the cause (etiology) of Ashley's mental and physical impairment (neurologic syndrome) was a developmental problem of in utero (prenatal) or genetic origin, and that any fetal distress she may have suffered at birth was not substantial and did not contribute to her condition. [Tr. 97] Here, I accept the testimony and opinion of Dr. Duchowny as being the more credible and substantial as to whether Ashley sustained a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment, and the cause of such dysfunction. Dr. Duchowny's opinions are credible, supported by the observations of other physicians as heretofore noted, and are most consistent with conclusions to be drawn or inferences raised by the medical records received into evidence.
Findings Of Fact By stipulation filed December 2, 1993, petitioners and respondent stipulated as follows: That pursuant to Chapter 766.301- 766.316, Florida Statutes, a claim was filed on behalf of the above-styled infant against the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (the "Association") on behalf of Andres Romero, Bertha Romero and Alberto Romero (the "Petitioners") for benefits under Chapter 766.301-766.316 (F.S.) 1988. That a timely filed claim for benefits complying with the requirements of F.S. 766.305 was filed by the Petitioners and a timely denial was filed on behalf of the Association. That the infant, Andres Romero, was born at Baptist Hospital [sic] [medical reports and records reflect South Miami Hospital] on July 22, 1991, and that the said hospital was a licensed Florida Hospital and the attending physician was a participating physician within the meaning of Chapter 766, Florida Statutes. That the Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of this claim. That Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, states that "birth-related neurological injury" means injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2500 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post- delivery in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially, mentally and physically impaired. The parties agree that Andres Romero suffers from a right brachial plexus injury. That the parties stipulate to the authenticity of the medical records and/or medical reports of Michael Duchowny, M.D., who appears on behalf of the Respondents and Leon I. Charash, M.D., who appears on behalf of the Petitioner. The parties stipulate that there are no other pertinent medical facts to be considered by the Division of Administrative Hearings. The parties further Stipulate that if the parties were to proceed to a hearing on the merits no further proof would be offered and traditional burdens of proof would apply. Based upon this stipulation, the parties request the hearing officer to rule on Petitioner's claim based upon this Stipulation, the attached medical records and the deposition of Dr. Duchowny. The neurological examinations of Andres reveal that he suffered from a "mild" to "moderate" right Erb's palsy related directly to the right brachial plexus injury he received at birth. A brachial plexus injury, the cause of Erb's palsy, is not, however, a spinal cord injury. Moreover, Andres's mental functioning is normal and not impaired due to any birth-related complications.
Findings Of Fact As observed in the preliminary statement, neither Petitioners nor anyone on their behalf offered any proof. Consequently, it must be resolved that Petitioners failed to demonstrate Aaron Colby Cross, a minor, suffered a "birth-related neurological injury" as alleged in the claim for benefits.
