Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC vs MARK G. WRIGHT, 00-003896PL (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Viera, Florida Sep. 19, 2000 Number: 00-003896PL Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2025
# 1
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs SANATKUMAR M. JANI, M.D., 00-004036PL (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida Sep. 29, 2000 Number: 00-004036PL Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2025
# 2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ROBERT DEAN MARSHALL, M.D., 12-001177PL (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida Mar. 30, 2012 Number: 12-001177PL Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2012

The Issue The issue is whether Respondent's Florida license to practice medicine should be revoked for malpractice under section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2006).

Findings Of Fact Respondent is licensed to practice medicine in Florida, holding license number ME 66823. He is a radiologist and is certified by the American Board of Orthopedic Radiology and Diagnostic Radiology. On June 17, 2004, the Board of Medicine (Board) disciplined Respondent's medical license by issuing a letter of concern, imposing a $15,000 fine, assessing $4,010.59 in costs, requiring eight hours of continuing medical education, and prohibiting him from treating or prescribing medication to members of his family. On or about October 4, 2006, while working at Drew Medical, Inc., Respondent performed a diagnostic procedure called an intravenous pyelogram (IVP) without tomograms for Patient G.P., who had complained of right-side pain and had a history of kidney stones. An IVP without tomograms is a series of time- lapse x-rays using a dye material to provide radiographically contrasting images to detect a stone in a kidney or ureter. The resulting x-ray images revealed a partial obstructing stone in the right-side kidney/ureter area, which Respondent detected and reported. One of the resulting x-ray images contained an anomaly having the classical appearance of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, including conspicuous tissue displacement and rim calcification. It had an elongated, water balloon-type appearance with calcifications on one of the walls. It was alarming or life- threatening in size, such that it could cause death by bleeding. Respondent did not mention the aneurysm in his report or recommend any further evaluation of the anomaly. Although he was tasked to look for kidney stones, Respondent's failure to report the aneurysm or recommend any further evaluation of the anomaly fell below the level of care, skill, and treatment that is recognized by reasonably prudent, similar physicians as being acceptable. Patient G.P. was admitted to Orlando Regional Hospital with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on October 6, 2006. Attempts were made to repair the rupture, but they were not successful. The patient died on October 12, 2006. By his conduct in disappearing without a trace, despite the diligent efforts of DOH to find him, and not participating in any manner in the hearing he requested to dispute the Administrative Complaint, Respondent effectively abandoned his license to practice medicine in Florida.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Board of Medicine enter a final order finding Respondent guilty of medical malpractice, revoking his medical license, and imposing a $10,000 administrative fine. DONE AND ENTERED this 25th day of July, 2012, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. S J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (850) 488-9675 Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 25th day of July, 2012. COPIES FURNISHED: Greg S. Marr, Esquire Department of Health Bin C-65 4052 Bald Cypress Way Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3265 Robert Dean Marshall, M.D. Apartment 310 400 East Colonial Drive Orlando, Florida 32803 Robert Dean Marshall, M.D. 5987 Southwest Moore Street Palm City, Florida 34990 Jennifer A. Tschetter, General Counsel Department of Health 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A-02 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701 Joy Tootle, Executive Director Board of Medicine Department of Health 4052 Bald Cypress Way Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701

Florida Laws (5) 120.569120.57456.035458.331766.102
# 3
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC vs JOSEPH MICHAEL ANTHONY, 00-003903PL (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:West Palm Beach, Florida Sep. 20, 2000 Number: 00-003903PL Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2025
# 4
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHARMACY vs ABLE GATO, 00-000694 (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami, Florida Feb. 10, 2000 Number: 00-000694 Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2025
# 5
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JACK L. GRESHAM, 06-000262PL (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Orlando, Florida Jan. 19, 2006 Number: 06-000262PL Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2025
# 6
BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS vs. MARIA I. ANDRAKOVICH, 86-002914 (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 86-002914 Latest Update: Sep. 02, 1987

The Issue The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent violated Chapter 458 Florida Statutes as alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated July 11, 1986; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.

Findings Of Fact Based upon the testimony of the witness and the documentary evidence received at the hearing, I make the following findings of fact: The Respondent, Maria I, Andrakovich, M.D., is a licensed physician in the State of Florida, having been issued license number MEOO2I436. On or about May 1, 1983, Respondent entered into a Service agreement with "The Doctor's Office, Inc." wherein Dr. Andrakovich agreed to provide medical services for the patients at 330 South Dixie Highway, Lake Worth, Florida. Respondent's employment with "The Doctor's Office, Inc." ended in March, 1984. On or about July 12, 1983, Respondent filed with the Board of Medical Examiners an Application for Certification for Physician's Assistant for Jean Eugene Raymond. On August 15, 1983, Mr. Raymond was certified to work under the supervision of Respondent pursuant to Chapter 458 Florida Statutes. On November 22, 1983, Mr. Raymond filed his Biennial Physician's Assistant Certification and reported a change of office address to 1177 Hypo1uxo Road, Lantana, Florida. Respondent executed the affidavit for this certification before a notary public. Respondent never worked at the Hypo1uxo, Road facility. Dr. Andrakovich remained at the prior office location which was approximately five miles from the Hypoluxo site. Prior to his move to the Hypoluxo facility, Mr. Raymond would confer, in person, with Dr. Andrakovich regarding each patient. After moving to the Hypoluxo facility, Mr. Raymond would confer with Dr. Andrakovich by telephone. Respondent relied on Mr. Raymond's judgment that this telephonic system of conferring about patients complied with any legal requirements of their relationship. Respondent did not know the regulations which govern physician's assistants. Many of the patients seen at the facilities on Hypoluxo and Dixie were elderly and suffered heart problems. Respondent's schedule required her to see one patient every fifteen minutes. This patient scheduling rate later increased to one patient every ten minutes. It was difficult for Respondent to confer with Mr. Raymond by telephone and meet the schedule. Respondent assumed Mr. Raymond would confer with the physicians at the Hypoluxo facility. No specific arrangement was made to require physicians at Hypoluxo to supervise Mr. Raymond nor did any physician there assume responsibility for Mr. Raymond's activities. During her employment with "The Doctor's Office, Inc." Respondent treated Norman Shapiro. Mr. Shapiro had a history of heart trouble, diabetes, and hypertension. During the fall of 1983, Mr. Shapiro had complained of increased pain which had resulted in Respondent doubling the strength of Mr. Shapiro's heart medication. Mr. Shapiro's medical record for this period suggested a deterioration in his heart condition. On November 21, 1983, Norman Shapiro went to the Hypoluxo facility and was seen by Mr. Raymond. Mr. Shapiro complained that he was constantly having to take his heart medication by handful amounts. Mr. Raymond recommended no coffee, tea, chocolates or smoking and that the patient should elevate his head 4-6 inches for sleeping. The only additional medication suggested was Maalox. The treatment recommended by Mr. Raymond was consistent with the diagnosis of a hiatal hernia but was inappropriate given the patient's history of heart disease. The minimally acceptable care within the medical community where "The Doctors' Office" was located would have required the patient Shapiro to be hospitalized. Mr. Raymond did not confer with Dr. Andrakovich regarding Mr. Shapiro's visit on November 21, 1983, until after the treatment had been recommended. Had Dr. Andrakovich seen Mr. Shapiro on that day, she would have put him in the hospital. Dr. Andrakovich believed Dr. Conti had treated Mr. Shapiro on November 21, 1983. On November 21, 1983, the electrocardiogram (EKG) for Mr. Shapiro was within normal limits. Despite the EKG, Mr. Shapiro's symptoms were cardiac- related and had a significant potential for morbidity and mortality. In fact, Mr. Shapiro died on November 22, 1983. Frank Colavecchio was president of the "The Doctor's Office Inc." and made all administrative decisions regarding the facilities on Dixie and Hypoluxo. Mr. Colavecchio administratively moved Mr. Raymond to the Hypoluxo office. On March 15, 1984, Dr. Andrahovich terminated employment with the "The Doctor's Office, Inc". Respondent did not notify the Board of Medical Examiners of this change and at no time advised the Board that she would no longer be supervising Mr. Raymond. It is inappropriate and contrary to standards of good medical practice for a physician's assistant to treat heart patients. Dr. Andrakovich knew or should have known that Mr. Raymond was treating heart patients.

Florida Laws (4) 120.57458.331458.347458.348
# 7
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs SAYED ARIF JAFFERY, M.D., 17-002556PL (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida Apr. 28, 2017 Number: 17-002556PL Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2025
# 8
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs GRIGORY KLIGER, M.D., 12-003688PL (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami, Florida Nov. 15, 2012 Number: 12-003688PL Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2013

The Issue The primary issue in this case is whether the crime of which Respondent was convicted directly relates to the practice of medicine or the ability to practice. If so, it will be necessary to determine an appropriate penalty.

Findings Of Fact At all times relevant to this case, Grigory Kliger, M.D., was licensed to practice medicine in the state of Florida, having been issued license number ME82106. Petitioner has regulatory jurisdiction over licensed physicians such as Dr. Kliger. In particular, the Department is authorized to file and prosecute an administrative complaint against a physician, as it has done in this instance, when a panel of the Board of Medicine has found that probable cause exists to suspect that the physician has committed a disciplinable offense. Exercising its prosecutorial authority, the Department has charged Dr. Kliger with one such offense, namely, being found guilty of a crime which directly relates to the practice of medicine. On February 1, 2005, in a case styled United States v. Kliger, No. 05-CR-12, which was then pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Dr. Kliger pleaded guilty to one count of a single-count information. The criminal offense with which he had been charged was conspiracy to commit health care fraud as defined in sections 1347 and 1349 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code. During the plea colloquy, Dr. Kliger testified under oath as follows regarding his criminal conduct: Between 1996 and June 2003, I knowingly and willfully agreed with others to defraud no- fault insurance companies which provided healthcare benefit programs that effected [sic] interstate commerce. * * * I was a doctor and had an ownership interest in several medical clinics, including medical clinics in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx, New York and elsewhere which submitted false claims to insurance companies for medical benefits, items and services that were never performed or delivered, were not ordered by a physician or were not necessary for treatment. When I caused this [sic] false claims to be submitted and reimbursed by the insurance, I knew watt [sic] I was doing was wrong. The magistrate judge found that Dr. Kliger's testimony was given knowingly and voluntarily and that there was an adequate factual basis for his plea; she recommended that the district judge accept Dr. Kliger's plea of guilty. Some time later, the court accepted the plea and, based thereon, adjudicated Dr. Kliger guilty as charged, entering a judgment of conviction on or about August 1, 2008. The judgment was later amended at least twice, most recently on March 13, 2012, to correct the spelling of Dr. Kliger's last name, which had been inscribed erroneously as "Kligor." Based on this conviction, the court sentenced Dr. Kliger to a term of 18 months' incarceration in a federal prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release with special conditions. In addition, Dr. Kliger was ordered to make restitution to the various insurance companies and clinics he had conspired to defraud. The total amount of the required restitution payments is approximately $2.5 million. The crime of which Dr. Kliger was convicted is directly related to the practice of medicine.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Board of Medicine enter a final order finding Dr. Kliger guilty the offense described in section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes, i.e., being convicted of a crime that directly relates to the practice of medicine. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Board of Medicine revoke Dr. Kliger's medical license and impose an administrative fine of $10,000. DONE AND ENTERED this 9th day of April, 2013, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. S JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (850) 488-9675 Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 9th day of April, 2013. COPIES FURNISHED: Yolonda Y. Green, Esquire Robert A. Milne, Esquire Department of Health 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C-65 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3265 Mark L. Pomeranz, Esquire Pomeranz & Associates, P.A. 1920 East Hallendale Beach Boulevard Suite #802 Hallendale Beach, Florida 33009 Allison Dudley, Executive Director Board of Medicine Department of Health 4052 Bald Cypress Way Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701 Jennifer A. Tschetter, General Counsel Department of Health 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A02 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701

Florida Laws (6) 120.569120.57120.68456.057456.072458.331 Florida Administrative Code (1) 64B8-8.0011
# 9
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHARMACY vs CHRIS A. JACOBS, P.S.I., 16-002568PL (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:St. Petersburg, Florida May 06, 2016 Number: 16-002568PL Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2025
# 10

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer