The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Hawke Carter, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact As observed in the preliminary statement, neither Petitioner nor anyone on her behalf appeared at hearing, and no proof was offered to support her claim. Contrasted with the dearth of proof offered by Petitioner, Respondent offered the opinions of Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatric neurology, and Charles Kalstone, M.D., a physician board- certified in obstetrics and gynecology. It was Dr. Duchowny's opinion, based on his neurological evaluation of Hawke on July 26, 2000 (at 2 1/2 years of age) and his review of the medical records regarding Hawke's birth, as well as the opinion of Dr. Kalstone, based on his review of the medical records, that Hawke's current neurological condition (which reveals evidence of severe motor and cognitive deficits) did not result from oxygen deprivation, mechanical trauma or any other event occurring during the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. Rather, it was their opinion that Hawke's disabilities are developmentally based and associated with a congenital syndrome, genetic in origin. Given Hawke's immediate perinatal history, which evidences an uncomplicated labor, delivery, and immediate post-partum period, as well as evidence of congenital heart disease, a diagnose of DiGeorge syndrome (confirmed by positive FISH analysis) and dysmorphic (malformed) features, the opinions of Doctors Duchowny and Kalstone are rationally based and supported by the record. Consequently, their opinions are credited, and it must be resolved that Hawkes' disability is associated with genetic or congenital abnormality, and is not related to any event which may have occurred during the course of his birth.
Findings Of Fact Elizabeth was born on November 26, 2011, at North Shore Medical Center. The subject Petition was filed on June 21, 2018, which is more than five years after Elizabeth’s birth. Dr. Mark Spence was the physician providing obstetric services and who was present at Elizabeth’s birth. Attached to Respondent’s Motion is the affidavit of Respondent’s Records Custodian, Tim Daughtry. Mr. Daughtry attests in his affidavit that, in 2011, Dr. Spence did not pay the five thousand dollar ($5,000.00) assessment prescribed in section 766.314(4)(c), Florida Statutes, required for participation in the Plan. Mr. Daughtry’s affidavit further provides that Respondent has no records to suggest that Dr. Spence is otherwise exempt from payment. To the contrary, Dr. Spence paid the two hundred fifty dollar ($250.00) assessment required by section 766.314(4)(b)1., for non-participating, non- exempt licensed physicians. Dr. Spence was not a participating physician in the Plan at the time of Elizabeth’s birth.
