The St. Supreme Crt. Comm. has denied my review
I need help, The Crt of Appeals mandated that trial court proceedings could go forth subject to their t.crts determint. I filed a motion for new trial, vac. of Decs and then waited. The judge, after 90 days never responded thus violating RCW 2.28.240. After such violation he sent me a ''letter'' not an order stating that my motions were denied. I motion the Crt. of App. to recall thier mandate, they immediat. rejected it to Supr Crt, I filed a motion for Discr Review, supre crt denied my motion saying I didn't provide certain informar. to support the recall.RAP 13.5(d) says I can refile but I am leary to go it alone leastwise w/o a clearer understand. Meanwhile the attonrey in quest. has a 2 million policy waiting for my legal pursuits to end in default. That attorney was formerly disbarred and placed on 2 year prob.
I am my own worst enemy, even though I know a great deal, like research, shepardis and draft doc. I sense that if my mot. 2 recon doesn't go well, fed crt maybe nexr and that will be even tougher. I need someone whose smart and take 1st lead, I can still do filings, leg word and research. Thxs
------v. Clark County, 91 wn App 505