A friend of mine is has problem: In 2004 her mother passed away ad left no will that is intestament, her eldest sister filed a petition in Probate Court to be Administrator of the of the Estate; The Court Granted her request- She was Orderd by the Court to disperse the remaining proceeds of the Estate of the deceased 25% four (04) ways (there are (04) remaining survving heirs, children).

There are several crucial questions: She feels (my friend) that her sister who is Administrator of the Estate failed to properly disperse equally the entirety of the proceeds of the estate fairly and retained as such to to her own benefits (less then the Cour-Ordered designated amount of proceeds.

Also the Statute of limitatations, does it have any application here with respect to to the unusual nature here of the Matter?

And is this Matter an issue for Probate Court even it is Post-Or is an issue for Civil Court? Any advice will be appreciated, thanks Vincent Elias

A test was given with the following grading criteria: benchmark 75%, 50 points awarded if the benchmark is met the 1st test. If you fail to meet the benchmark the first time, you can retake the test and receive 25 points if the benchmark is met.

After all results are in the following Monday, the instructor announces that the benchmark was changed to 70 and those who scored 70 the 1st test are awarded 50 points. I scored 68 the 1st test and 78 the 2nd test. How fair is it that a student who scored 70 both times never meeting the original benchmark receives a full 50 points. In all fairness to everyone who failed to originally meet the benchmark of 75 the 1st test, wouldn't it have been fair for the department to say: seeing how difficult it was to reach the original benchmark we will award 50 points to all who meet 70% the 2nd test. This gives everyone a fair chance at receiving the 50 points. A change was made to accomodate only some students and not all. Is this worth fighting for considering those 50 points helped students pass the entire course while others failed?

Hi i have been gaurding a exit door for almost a year now.

This job dosn't require getting sertified as a securty gaurd. (I've been trying to talk to my boss about it)

Usally when i tell people to go out and use the front door, they will have a 30sec argue and they usually just give up and walk to the front door.

I do get costomers/people who sneak in that try to egnore me and walk past me but i get in their way and ask them to leave.

I have never shouted at a customer beacause it "disturbs the peace" but if the customer/people who try to sneak in starts to yell could i call 911 and possibly get them kicked out?

so my ultimate question is if i stay as a non-sertified security gaurd then what are the do's and don'ts

and if i get sertified as a security gaurd what advatages does that give me?