Orange FL Lawyers | Allison Carmine McDonald -- eLawyers

Allison Carmine McDonald

Visitors: 69

Bar #148792(FL) License for 27 years

Orlando FL

Are you Allison Carmine McDonald? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 20.165, 455.227, 455.2273, 455.228, 475.01, 475.011, 475.42, 475.624, 489.13, 721.20, 95.11

17-000476 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs RICHARD L. SOVICH (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 20, 2017

Whether Respondent acted as a real estate agent without being licensed in violation of section 475.42(1)(a), Florida Statutes, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear & convincing evidence that Respondent rented out complainant's property in exchange for valuable consideration while he was not licensed as a real estate agent or broker. Recommended penalty of $500 & cost of the investigation.

16-002583PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL BOARD vs JASON DWIGHT WALKER (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 10, 2016

Whether Respondent, Jason Dwight Walker, prepared a preconstruction appraisal report that was in violation of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), and thus section 475.624(4), Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J1-9.001, as alleged in the First Amended Administrative Complaint and, if so, the sanctions to be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated the standards for conducting an appraisal as alleged in the First Amended Administrative Complaint, which should, therefore, be dismissed.

10-009617PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs AMIE LAYNE BENNIS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 12, 2010

The issue to be determined is whether Respondent violated sections 475.42(1)(b) & (d) and 475.25(1)(k) & (d)1., Florida Statutes (2008), and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner failed to prove allegations in Administration Complaint because it failed to prove Respondent received or expected compenation for services she provided as a favor to complainant.

09-005356PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs HOWARD KLAHR (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 01, 2009

Did the Respondent, Howard Klahr, fail to deliver or communicate appraisals of properties located at 5821 Southwest 20th Street, Miami, Florida and 2761-63 Southwest 31 Place, Miami, Florida 33133? Did Respondent, Howard Klahr, commit or make fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, false promises, false pretenses, dishonest conduct, culpable negligence, or breach of trust in his business relationship with Jane Asorey. What is the proper discipline, if any, to be imposed on Respondent, Howard Klahr (Mr. Klahr)?Clear and convincing evidence proved property appraiser who was paid in advance did not communicate appraisal and breached trust in a business transaction. $1,000 fine, 90-day suspension, 18-month probation with education, and restitution penalty.

12-003398PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL BOARD vs GLENN RICHARD GREBER (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 16, 2012

10-001964PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs MICHELLE LOPEZ (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 14, 2010

10-003199PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs KAI R. HOLGREN, P.A. (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 14, 2010