welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  7. Andrea Valencia Nelson
Andrea Valencia Nelson
Andrea Valencia Nelson
Visitors: 60
0
Bar #933260(FL)     License for 33 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Andrea Valencia Nelson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

10-006279BID  PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 2010
The issue in this case is whether the evaluators of the subject request for proposals (RFP) were qualified under the applicable law and RFP criteria to evaluate the proposals.Petitioner did not meet its burden of proving that evaluators were unqualified to evaluate responses to RFP; recommend dismissal of petition.
10-006280BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 2010
The issues are whether the intended contract awarded to Intervenor, The Henry and Rilla White Foundation, Inc. (Intervenor or White), pursuant to Request for Proposals #P2062 (RFP) for an Intensive Delinquency Diversion Services (IDDS) program in Palm Beach County, Florida (Circuit 15), is contrary to Respondent’s governing statutes, policies and rules, and the RFP. Petitioner, Juvenile Services Program, Inc. (Petitioner or JSP), timely challenged the intended award, and alleged that the award to Intervenor was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.BID protester failed to establish Department incorrectly scored or abitrarily awarded bid at issue. Department's decision is supported by the record.
07-001975BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 08, 2007
Whether the proposed award of Request for Proposal No. P2021 to Psychotherapeutic Services of Florida, Inc. (hereinafter "Psychotherapeutic Services"), is contrary to Respondent, Department of Juvenile Justice's (hereinafter "Department"), governing statutes, rules or policies, or the proposal specifications.Petitioner did not prove the selected proposal was non-responsive to the Request for Proposal. Respondent`s decision to award the contract to the proposer with the highest point total was not erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
03-003670BID  MAD DADS OF GREATER OCALA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
03-003671BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish the Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
03-003672BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
03-003673BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
01-003847BID  PERSONAL ENRICHMENT THROUGH MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 01, 2001
Whether Respondent's proposed decision to award a contract to Florida Youth Academy, Inc., pursuant to Request for Proposals No. F4G01, is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, rules, or policies or the proposal specifications.Recommend dismissal of bid protest where Petitioner failed to demonstrate that awardee deviated from mandatory bid specifications, or that deviations in scoring among evaluators amounted to more than honest and reasonable difference of opinion.
00-001366BID  SOUTH FLORIDA JAIL MINISTRIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 2000
Whether Petitioner's protest, challenging Respondent's "identif[ication of] Associated Marine Institute[s], Inc. for potential award(s) [of] the contract" advertised in RFP No. K9018, should be sustained in whole or in part?The selection of a proposer for potential award of a contract was premature where cost proposals had not yet been evaluated.
98-004456  NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 07, 1998
Did the Department of Transportation (Department) properly issue the Notice of Denied Application pursuant to Chapter 479, Florida Statutes, and Rule 14-10.004(1)(d), Florida Administrative Code?Petitioner failed to establish facts to show entilement to sign permit.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer