Leon FL Banking, Elder law and Estate planning Lawyers

Bruce Alexander Minnick

Visitors: 97

850-893-6091

Bar #250295(FL) License for 47 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you Bruce Alexander Minnick? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 42 U.S.C 2000E

Florida Laws: 104.31, 110.205, 110.402, 110.403, 112.31, 112.312, 112.313, 112.3145, 112.322, 112.532, 112.533, 112.534, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.56, 120.565, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 120.69, 509.092, 517.021, 517.12, 517.221, 517.301, 57.041, 57.105, 57.111, 626.207, 626.611, 626.621, 626.631, 626.8437, 626.854, 626.869, 626.8698, 633.128, 7.221, 72.011, 721.02, 721.05, 721.056, 721.06, 721.07, 721.11, 721.111, 721.23, 721.26, 760.01, 760.02, 760.10, 760.11, 775.08, 775.082, 943.1397

Florida Administrative Code: 6C3-10.211, 6C3-10.232, 6C-5.940

08-003313 RONICA TUCKER vs CRANE AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONICS (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 09, 2008

The issue for determination in this matter is whether Respondent engaged in unlawful employment practices by discriminating against Petitioner on the basis of race or sex in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as amended.Respondent did not commit an unlawful employment practice concerning discrimination against Petitioner on the basis of her race or gender. The Petition for Relief should be dismissed.

08-002528 DIANNA DECKER vs THE GADSDEN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND REGINALD JAMES, SUPERINTENDENT OF GADSDEN COUNTY SCHOOLS (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2008

The issue presented is whether Respondents are guilty of committing a discriminatory practice against Petitioner, in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, by denying her a promotion and/or by constructively discharging her from her employment.Petitioner`s failure to apply for or even express an interest in the promotion at issue prevents her from proving that she did not receive the promotion due to her race. She also failed to prove constructive discharge by failing to offer any evidence.

06-000051PL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs BRADFORD SCOTT BATEMAN (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2006

The issue is whether Respondent’s license as a public adjuster, all lines, should be revoked.Petitioner is required to revoke Respondent`s license where he pled nolo contendre and was adjudicated guilty of three felonies involving moral turpitude.

05-004544 JENNY LANCETT vs DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 15, 2005

Whether the Petitioner, Jenny Lancett (Petitioner) is entitled to additional credit for the answers she provided to challenged examination questions. The Petitioner has challenged the State Officers Certification Examination (SOCE) for Law Enforcement Officers given in July of 2005 (DOAH Case No. 05-4544) and September of 2005 (DOAH Case No. 06-0325).Petitioner`s challenges to the test results were inadequate to support an award of additional credit.

03-002963EC IN RE: JOHN L. CARTER vs * (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2003

The issues for determination are: Whether Respondent, John L. Carter, violated Section 112.3145, Florida Statutes (1995), by failing to file a CE Form 1, Statement of Financial Interests, for calendar year 1996. Whether Respondent violated Section 112.3145, Florida Statutes (1995), by failing to file a CE Form 1, Statement of Financial Interests, for calendar year 1997. Whether Respondent violated Section 112.3145, Florida Statutes (1995), by failing to file a CE Form 1, Statement of Financial Interests, for calendar year 1998.Respondent was a "local official"/"puchasing agent" as defined by statute. Respondent failed to file financial disclosure form CE 1 for 1996, 1997, and 1998. Recommend fine.

02-001231EC IN RE: RUDY MALOY vs * (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2002

The issues in this case are, one, whether Respondent corruptly used his official positions to sexually harass female subordinates in violation of Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes; and, two, whether Respondent solicited or accepted sexual favors from female subordinates based upon any understanding that his vote, official action, or judgment would be influenced thereby, in violation of Section 112.313(2), Florida Statutes.Evidence failed to prove clearly and convincingly that Respondent intentionally misused his official position as county commissioner to sexually harrass female subordinates, or solicited or received sexual favors to influence official judgment.

01-002088RU TERRY H. MEEK vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 25, 2001

The issue is whether Respondent's statements as set forth in a letter dated April 30, 2001, are rules as defined in Section 120.52(15), Florida Statutes, which have not been promulgated as required by Section 120.54(1)(a), Florida Statutes.Letter suspending Petitioner from his Senior Management Service position as Director of Capitol police was not an umpromulgated rule.

00-001600RX RONALD A. GRIMALDI vs FLORIDA STATE BOXING COMMISSION (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2000

The issue is whether Rules 61K1-1.0011(3)(c) and 61K1- 1.0011(3)(g), Florida Administrative Code, and a portion of Form BPR-08-451 (currently Form BPR-0009451), which is incorporated therein by reference, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Rule 61K-1.0011(3)(c), Florida Administrative Code, is valid but Rule 61K1-1.0011(3)(g), Florida Administrative Code, extends and enlarges upon Respondent`s rulemaking authority.

93-005812 CLARA VIRGINIA BERT vs DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 04, 1996

Whether Petitioner's transfer from the position of Program Director I to the position of Program Specialist IV was in violation of Section 760.10, Florida Statutes.Petitioner proved race discrimination played a significant part in the decision to demote her; and Respondent failed to prove the same result would have occured in the absence of the unlawful factor.

94-002754 ROBERT JONES vs DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 12, 1994

Whether respondent is guilty of an unlawful employment practice as alleged by petitioner in his petition for relief.EVEN WHERE REASON FOR ACTION SHOWN TO BE PRETEXT, NO VIOLATION OF STATUTE IF REAL REASON NOT UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION.