Leon FL Lawyers | Charles F Tunnicliff -- eLawyers

11-000436 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs MIAMI SUBS GRILL (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 25, 2011

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Restaurant should be fined for three critical violations of the Food Code.

11-001410 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs SOUP SWIFT (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 17, 2011

The issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent’s restaurant license should be disciplined.Evidence showed Respondent violated portions of the Food Code but not other portions.

11-002599 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs GIGI'S CAFE (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 23, 2011

The issue is whether Respondent, in the operation of a public food establishment, is guilty of various violations of the law governing such establishments and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Revocation for licensee that committed numerous critical violations of the Food Code.

08-003014 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF AUCTIONEERS vs AUCTION DEPOT (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 19, 2008

Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated February 5, 2007, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Respondent did not remit monies owed to consignor within a reasonable amound of time and did not return consigned items that were not sold at auction. Its license cannot be revoked because it expired 12/1/07. Recommend a fine of $2,000.

09-000618 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs CHINA, NO. 1 (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 04, 2009

The issues are whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated October 20, 2008, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed against Respondent's license.Respondent failed to correct critical violations. Thus, the appropriate penalty is an administrative fine of $1,000.00 for each violation and completion of an education program.

07-000680PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS vs STEPHEN PHILLIPS KILMON (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2007

The issue in this case is whether the Respondent, Stephen Phillips Kilmon, committed the violations alleged in an Amended Administrative Complaint issued by the Petitioner Department of Business and Professional Regulation on January 25, 2007, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Respondent incorrectly named a "Quantity Survey" as a "Specific or Special Purpose Survey."

09-001129 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs CHINA WOK (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 03, 2009

Whether Respondent committed the violation set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.The only violation cited in the Administrative Complaint was corrected by call-back inspection. Recommend dismissal of the Administrative Complaint.

09-004258 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs RAM'S ROTI PALACE (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 2009

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed the violations of the Food Code and Section 509.049, Florida Statutes, alleged in the Administrative Complaint; Recommend a $3,100.

09-005523 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs ALTHEA'S (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2009

The issues are whether Respondent operated as a public food service establishment with dirty food contact surfaces and utensils and without a certified food protection manager present in violation of Florida Administrative Code Rules 61C-1.001(14) and 61C-4.023(1) and in violation of Subsection 509.032(6), Florida Statutes (2008),1 and, if so, what penalty, if any, should be imposed against Respondent's license.Restaurant that failed to correct dirty mixer and to have certified food manager present before re-inspection should be fined $2,000.

07-000491 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs MAMA D`S PASTA AND GRILLE (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 29, 2007

The issues in the case are whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Failure to correct the violations of food safety code warrants a fine.

Charles F Tunnicliff