Leon FL Administrative law, Energy and utilities and Federal -- eLawyers

09-002345 IN RE: PETITION TO MERGE SPLIT PINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND THE TOLOMATO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs * (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 04, 2009

Whether the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (the “Commission”) should grant the Petition of the Tolomato Community Development District ("Tolomato") and the Split Pine Community Development District ("Split Pine") (collectively, the "Districts" or "Petitioners") to merge the two community development districts pursuant to Section 190.046(3), Florida Statutes? Concomitantly, whether the Commission should adopt a rule pursuant to Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, that establishes a single community development district with boundaries that incorporate the areas of Tolomato and Split Pine merged into the single district to be known as the Tolomato Community Development District (the "Merged District")?Petition to merge two Community Developtment Districts across county lines appears to meet all criteria for merger. Tolomato Community Development District should be the surviving district.

03-004660 IN RE: PETITION FOR RULE CREATION - SPLIT PINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs * (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 2003

The issue before the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (FLWAC) in this proceeding is whether to grant the Petition for Establishment of the Split Pine Community Development District (Petition). The local public hearing was for the purpose of gathering information in anticipation of rulemaking by FLWAC.Petition to establish a community development district, alongside a sister community development district in an adjoining county, as part of a single development of regional impact, seemed to meet all statutory requirements.

03-004661 IN RE: PETITION FOR RULE CREATION - TOLOMATO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs * (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 2003

The issue before the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (FLWAC) in this proceeding is whether to grant the Petition for Establishment of the Tolomato Community Development District (Petition). The local public hearing was for the purpose of gathering information in anticipation of rulemaking by FLWAC.Petition to establish a community development district, alongside a sister community development district in an adjoining county, as part of a single development of regional impact seemed to meet all statutory requirements.

03-001485 IN RE: PETITION FOR RULE CREATION - DURBIN CROSSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs * (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 2003

The sole issue to be addressed is whether the Petition to establish the Durbin Crossing Community Development District meets the applicable criteria set forth in Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 42-1, Florida Administrative Code.Community Development District Rule Petition met statutory criteria.

02-001343 IN RE: PETITION FOR RULE CREATION - BARTRAM SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs * (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 03, 2002

The issue is whether the establishment of the Bartram Springs Community Development District meets the applicable criteria set forth in Chapter 190, Florida Statutes.Petitioner satisfied requirements for establishing a community development district in Duval County.

02-000332 IN RE: RULEMAKING TO ESTABLISH THE DOUBLE BRANCH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs * (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 2002

The sole issue to be addressed is whether the Petition to establish the Double Branch Community Development District meets the applicable criteria set forth in Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 42-1, Florida Administrative Code.Petition to establish Double Branch Community Development District meets the applicable criteria set forth in Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 42-1, Florida Administrative Code.

97-004370BID 241 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 1997

Is the Department of Juvenile Justice's (DJJ's) intended award of the lease-purchase contract pursuant to RFP-P6P02 to The Haskell Company (Haskell) instead of to 241 Development Corporation (241 or 241 Development) contrary to the Agency's governing statutes, rules or policies, or the proposal specifications? See Section 120.57(3)(f), Florida Statutes, (Supp. 1996).BID responsiveness issues discussed as raised against Petitioner on "standing," as against Intervenor on protest, and as de novo.

95-001639BID MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 04, 1995

The issue is whether the Department of Corrections (DOC) acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, illegally or dishonestly when it decided to award the contract under Bid Number 94-CO-6355, for Inmate Pay Telephones and Long Distance Service (the Contract), to the number two-ranked bidder, North American Intelecom, Inc. (NAI).An agency's disregard of all advertised evaluation criteria and award of bid solely on basis of cost or lack thereof is totally arbitrary.

94-005264 IN RE: A RULE TO ESTABLISH THE CENTRAL VIERA COMMUNITY DISTRICT vs * (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 22, 1994

Whether the Petition to establish the Central Viera Community Development District meets the criteria set forth in Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 42-1, F.A.C.Petition for creation of Community Development District is uncontested-proposed district meets all statutory criteria--recommends approval by Florida Land and Water Adjuicatory District.

94-004463DRI INDIGO DEVELOPMENT, INC. vs FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION AND MONROE COUNTY (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 1994

Petition addresses all criteria for establishment of a development district.

Cheryl Garbukas Stuart