Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Diane Kay Kiesling
Diane Kay Kiesling
Visitors: 89
0
Bar #233285(FL)     License for 48 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Diane Kay Kiesling? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

10-003093PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ESTEBAN ANTONIO GENAO, M.D.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 04, 2010
Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated March 26, 2010, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove Respondent committed medical malpractice in prescribing controlled substances, failed to keep required documentation, or kept inadequate medical records. Administrative Complaint should be dismissed.
10-009316PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MYRDALIS DIAZ-RAMIREZ, M.D.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 2010
The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated section 456.072(1)(bb), Florida Statutes (2008),1/ and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent ordered epidural steroid injections, but due to clerical error, sacroiliac joint injection was scheduled. Prior to procedure, Respondent determined sacroiliac injection was appropriate; recommend dismissal of the administrative complaint.
10-003348PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ESTABAN ANTONIO GENAO, M.D.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 21, 2010
Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated March 27, 2009, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.DOH proved that pediatric physician kept illegible & inadequate medical records and committed medical malpractice in treatment of HIV/AIDS patients. DOH failed to prove administered legend drugs outside professional practice. License should be revoked.
10-007289PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ROBERT BURNS, M.D.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 09, 2010
The issue to be determined is whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(bb), Florida Statutes (2008),1/ as alleged in the Administrative Complaint and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner proved that Respondent performed wrong-site procedure but did provide record-keeping violation. Recommend letter of concern, fine, risk management education and community service.
09-005457PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs BERNARD J. ZARAGOZA, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2009
The issues for determination are whether Respondent Bernard J. Zaragoza, M.D., violated Section 456.072(1)(bb), Florida Statutes (2007), as alleged in an Administrative Complaint filed by the Department of Health before the Board of Medicine on June 30, 2008; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against his license to practice medicine in the State of Florida.Respondent performed wrong procedure when he removed patient's kideny during gallbladder removal surgery.
09-004678PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MATTHEW J. KACHINAS, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002), in DOAH Case No. 09-4678PL; Subsections 456.072(1)(l), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), in DOAH Case No. 09-4679PL; and Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005), in DOAH Case No. 09-4680PL, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent committed gross malpractice when he failed to identify the twin with anomalies in a selected feticide and performed the procedure on the normal twin.
09-004679PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MATTHEW J. KACHINAS, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002), in DOAH Case No. 09-4678PL; Subsections 456.072(1)(l), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), in DOAH Case No. 09-4679PL; and Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005), in DOAH Case No. 09-4680PL, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent committed gross malpractice when he failed to identify the twin with anomalies in a selected feticide and performed the procedure on the normal twin.
09-004680PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MATTHEW J. KACHINAS, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002), in DOAH Case No. 09-4678PL; Subsections 456.072(1)(l), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), in DOAH Case No. 09-4679PL; and Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005), in DOAH Case No. 09-4680PL, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent committed gross malpractice when he failed to identify the twin with anomalies in a selected feticide and performed the procedure on the normal twin.
09-002722PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs GUILLERMO ACHONG, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 18, 2009
Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint December 19, 2005, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated standard of care by not inquiring into the particulars when labor room nurse advised him that the patient had a "gush" of vaginal bleeding.
09-001577PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOSEPH DANIEL LABS, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 2009
The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m), 458.331(1)(t), and 458.331(1)(bb), Florida Statutes (2005),1 and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent placed breast implants subpectorally as requested by the patient. There is no violation of Section 458.331, Florida Statutes.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer