Alachua FL and Constitutional Lawyers | Gary Scott Edinger -- eLawyers

17-1577 American Entertainers, L.L.C. v. City of Rocky Mount, NC (2018)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Apr. 27, 2018

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1577 AMERICAN ENTERTAINERS, L.L.C., a North Carolina limited liability company, d/b/a Gentleman’s Playground, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00438-D) Argued: January 24, 2018 Decided: April 27, 2018 Before AGEE, WYNN, and TH..

02-4735-9P7 In Re Sanderson (2002)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Jul. 08, 2002 Citations: 283 B.R. 595

283 B.R. 595 (2002) In re SANDERSON, Thomas Jeffrey, and Sanderson, Rose Mary, Debtors. No. 02-4735-9P7. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. July 8, 2002. *596 Jeffrey W. Leasure, Leasure & Heidkamp, P.A., Fort Myers, FL, for debtors. Diane L. Jensen, Fort Myers, FL, Chapter 7 Trustee. ORDER ON TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF EXEMPTION ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge. On March 13, 2002, Thomas Jeffrey and Rose Mary Sanderson (Debtors) filed their voluntary Petition..

12-003370 CLARK DP INVESTMENTS, INC., D/B/A THE BANK BAR AND LOUNGE vs CITY OF GAINESVILLE (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 11, 2012

The issue is whether the City of Gainesville ("City") properly issued an Underage Prohibition Order to Petitioner, Clark DP Investments, Inc., d/b/a The Bank Bar and Lounge ("The Bank") pursuant to section 4-53, Gainesville Code of Ordinances.City did not demonstrate departure from the essential requirements of law.

12-003649 FUBAR vs CITY OF GAINESVILLE (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 2012

Whether the Respondent's issuance of an Underage Prohibition Order is appropriate or should be rescinded.Respondent proved requisite number of underage drinking incidents. However, Petitioner used reasonable diligence to deter and detect underage drinking. Recommend Underage Probition Order be rescinded.

10-001848 CHRISTOPHER CASTELLIO, SR. vs ALACHUA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 2010

Whether Respondent discriminated against Petitioner based upon Petitioner’s race or handicap in providing housing assistance. Whether Respondent, in providing housing assistance, failed to make reasonable accommodations for Petitioner’s physical disability.Pet. failed to prove that Resp. discriminated against him based upon race or handicap, or that Resp. failed to make reasonable accommodations for Pet.'s disability in providing housing assistance to Pet. and his family.

04-004110FE CHARLES OSBORNE vs ALEXANDER J. MILANICK (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 12, 2004

The issue is whether Respondent Alexander J. Milanick should be required to pay attorney fees and costs in the amount of $4,976.00 to Petitioner Charles Osborne to compensate Petitioner for his defense of an ethics complaint filed with the Florida Commission on Ethics.Respondent filed an ethics complaint naming Petitioner before the Florida Commission on Ethics, which was dismissed by the Commission upon a finding of no probable cause. Petitioner demanded attorney`s fees. Recommend that Respondent pay attorney`s fees.

02-004850 ASHER G. SULLIVAN, JR., D/B/A ST. AUGUSTINE TRUST vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 20, 2002

The issue presented is whether, pursuant to Section 376.3072, Florida Statutes, Petitioner, Asher G. Sullivan, Jr., d/b/a St. Augustine Trust, is eligible for restoration coverage pursuant to the Florida Petroleum Liability Restoration and Insurance Program (FPLRIP), Section 376.3072, Florida Statutes.The owner of underground storage tanks was not eligible for restoration coverage because he did not maintain financial responsibility, i.e., insurance coverage, upon the report of the discharge to the Department of Environmental Protection.

01-003014 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs CAFE EROTICA, WE DARE TO BARE, ADULT TOYS/GREAT FOOD, EXIT 94, INC. (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 25, 2001

Is the Notice of Violation against Respondent valid; and if valid, may the Department of Transportation require that the allegedly offending signs be removed?Evidence showed that Respondent`s sign consisted primarily of corporate name entitled to exemption even though secondary benefit to another corporation of Respondent.

01-001430 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs G AND J MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2001

Whether Respondent engaged in, or benefited from, the unpermitted removal, cutting, or trimming of vegetation.Department did not prove that Respondent engaged in or benefited from removal, cutting, or trimming of trees or vegetation on public right-of-way. Recommend agency rescind notice of violation.

01-000727 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs CAFE EROTICA, WE DARE TO BARE, ADULT TOYS/GREAT FOOD, EXIT 94, INC. (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 21, 2001

A permanent billboard is not entitled to an on-premises sign exemption when no substantial business activity related to sign is conducted on contiguous real property and sign does not advertise any business activity conducted on that property.

Gary Scott Edinger