Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Henry Kenza van Assenderp
Henry Kenza van Assenderp
Visitors: 37
0
Bar #158829(FL)     License for 52 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Henry Kenza van Assenderp? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

02-004356  IN RE: PETITION FOR RULE CREATION - COCOHATCHEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs *  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 06, 2002
At "issue" in this hearing was the Petition for Rulemaking to Establish a Uniform Community Development District, dated October 10, 2002 (Petition). The Petition, filed by Beach Road Development Company L.L.C., requested that the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (FLWAC) adopt a rule to establish a state-chartered uniform community development district, to be called the Cocohatchee Community Development District, on certain property in Lee County, Florida. The hearing was for purposes of gathering information in anticipation of quasi- legislative rulemaking by FLWAC.Establishment of new Community Development District in Lee County; local public hearing held; evidence was that all statutory "factors" were met.
02-004357  IN RE: PETITION FOR RULE AMENDMENT - FIDDLER`S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs *  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 06, 2002
At "issue" in this hearing was a petition to amend Rule 42X-1, Florida Administrative Code, to expand the boundaries of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District (CDD) by approximately 137 acres and simultaneously contract the boundaries by approximately 137 acres (for approximately no net change in overall total acreage), and to change its name by adding the numeral 1.Petition to expand and contract Community Development District and change name. Report summarized hearing and pointed out some differences between hearing record and apparent statutory provisions.
99-001973  LONG BAY PARTNERS, L.L.C., THE BROOKS OF BONITA SPRINGS II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION AND MONROE COUNTY  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 29, 1999
The issue in this case is whether the Brooks of Bonita Springs II Petition to Establish a Uniform Community Development District [By Rule] (the Petition) should be granted.Dispute is over a petition to establish a community development district. All statutory criteria were addressed, and the petition met them all.
97-003367  THE BROOKS OF BONITA SPRINGS vs FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION AND MONROE COUNTY  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 21, 1997
The issue is whether the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission should promulgate a rule establishing the Brooks of Bonita Springs Community Development District.Petitioner entitled to rule establishing community development district.
95-006106  IN RE: ESTABLISHMENT BY RULE OF FIDDLER`S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs *  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 18, 1995
The issue in this case is whether the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission should promulgate a rule establishing the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District.Proposed Community Development District may be consistent with state and local comprehensive plans.
93-001490  IN RE: PELICAN MARSH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs *  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 1993
Whether the petition of Westinghouse Communities of Naples, Inc., to establish the Pelican Marsh Community Development District in Collier County, Florida, meets the requirements of Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes.Uncontraverted evidence established that proposed community development district met criteria.
91-001813EPP  ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION, FLORIDA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, AND KISSIMMEE UTILITY AUTHORITY vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 22, 1991
The issues to be determined in this proceeding are whether OUC should receive supplemental certification from the Siting Board for its proposed Unit 2 electrical power plant and associated facilities, including a transmission line and alternate access road, and what conditions, if any, should be incorporated within such supplemental certification to assure that minimal adverse consequences result from the new electrical power plant and associated facilities. The parties have reached substantial agreement on issues of fact and upon conditions of certification necessary to assure compliance with applicable nonprocedural requirements of the agencies having jurisdiction over the project. No party opposes the issuance of the supplemental certification sought by OUC, leaving a single dispute between OUC and SJRWMD as to SJRWMD's proposed condition of certification which would limit OUC's consumptive water use authorization to a ten-year period commencing on the date of certification and would essentially require OUC to reapply for subsequent consumptive use permits for water use thereafter.Intent of Power Plant Siting Act (PPSA) is centralized one-stop permitting. Limiting duration of consumptive water use conflicts with PPSA & St. Johns Regional Water Management District rule. Supplemental Certification.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer