Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Isadore F Rommes, Jr.
Isadore F Rommes, Jr.
Visitors: 25
0
Bar #231126(FL)     License for 48 years; Member in Good Standing
Perry FL

Are you Isadore F Rommes, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

96-001428  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES vs NATIONAL PETROLEUM PACKERS, INC.  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 22, 1996
Whether the respondent committed the violations of the Antifreeze Law alleged by the petitioner in letters dated January 16, 1996, March 6, 1996, and July 12, 1996, and, if so, the penalties which should be imposed.Anti-freeze did not meet minimum corrosion standards and penalties should be $3000 fine for each of the seven lots violating standards and one year suspension of brand registration.
96-003191  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES vs DODGE CITY PONY AND KIDDIE RIDES, INC.  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 08, 1996
At issue is whether respondent committed the offenses alleged in the administrative complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Company engaged in the rental of amusement devices fined for failure to have devices properly inspected and permitted.
94-002121BID  CONWAY CONSERVATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 1994
Whether Petitioner submitted the lowest responsive bid on ITB/DF-93/94-49.BID dispute evidence showed that agency decision reasonable where references for closely held corporation were not for corporporation but for individual sole owner and officer.
93-004957  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES vs SWEETWATER ATHLETIC CLUB, INC.  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 31, 1993
The issue for disposition in this proceeding is whether, as required by subsection 501.017(1)(b)1., F.S., and rules 5J-4.003(1) and 5J-4.012, F.A.C., Respondent, a health studio, provided its patrons a facility of equal quality, within five driving miles, at no extra cost, when Respondent's facility closed in January, 1993.Health club that did not provide alter racquetball facilities on closing is liable for membership refund to members who used racquetball exclusively.
81-002486  J. C. GRANTHAM vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1981)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 17, 1982
Whether Petitioner's application for a dredge and fill permit under Chapter 403, F.S., and water quality certification under PL 92-500, should be approved. This proceeding involves Petitioner's request for an "after-the-fact" dredge and fill permit to place approximately 3,220 square feet of fill material on his property, which is contiguous to Spring Warrior Creek in Taylor County for the purposes of a pad to support a mobile home. Respondent issued its intent to deny the permit on July 31, 1901, on grounds that the proposed fill would result in a loss of a tidal marsh area and that the fill would result in water quality degradation. Respondent thereafter requested a hearing on the denial of his application. At the hearing, Petitioner testified in his own behalf, but presented no other witnesses. Two witnesses testified for the Respondent. Two composite exhibits were received in evidence. The parties agreed that the time for rendering a Recommended Order in this case would be extended until on or before January 29, 1982. Respondent submitted Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and those portions thereof which have not been adopted herein are considered to be either unnecessary, irrelevant, or unwarranted in law or fact.Recommend denial of after-the-fact permit for fill in wetlands. Cumulative damage was not disproven.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer