welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  7. James Stewart Lewis Jr.
James Stewart Lewis Jr.
James Stewart Lewis Jr.
Visitors: 38
0
Bar #318957(FL)     License for 43 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you James Stewart Lewis Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-001617  THE FLORIDA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING; AND CALDER RACE COURSE, INC.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2019
Whether the FHBPA, FTBOA, and OBS have standing to challenge the Division’s issuance of a new summer jai alai permit to Calder; and, if so, whether FHBPA’s petition and FTBOA’s and OBS’s motions to intervene were timely; and, if so, whether the Division properly granted a new summer jai alai permit to Calder pursuant to section 550.0745(1), Florida Statutes (2019), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61D-4.002.FHBPA, FTBOA, and OBS have standing to asssert that alleged agency statements constitute unadopted rules. However, none of the alleged statements constitute unadopted rules.
19-002860RU  THE FLORIDA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC., FLORIDA THOROUGHBRED OWNERS AND BREEDERS ASSOCIATION, INC. AND OCALA BREEDERS' SALES COMPANY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 29, 2019
Whether the FHBPA, FTBOA, and OBS have standing to bring this unadopted rule challenge; and, if so, whether their petition was timely; and, if so, whether the Division’s determination that a new summer jai alai permit was made available and that Calder is eligible for a new summer jai alai permit pursuant to section 550.0745(1), Florida Statutes (2019), is based on unadopted rules.FHBPA, FTBOA, and OBS have standing to asssert that alleged agency statements constitute unadopted rules. However, none of the alleged statements constitute unadopted rules.
18-23565  Melvin Bigham and Deneen Porter Bigham  (2010)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Nov. 12, 2010 Citations: 441 B.R. 154
441 B.R. 154 (2010) In re Keith F. MILLER, Debtor. Michael R. Bakst, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Keith F. Miller, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-19281-BKC-PGH. Adversary No. 10-3152-BKC-PGH-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, West Palm Beach Division. November 12, 2010. Morris G. Miller, Ruden McClosky, West Palm Bch, FL, for Trustee Plaintiff. Brett A. Elam, Esq., Delray Beach, FL, Morris G. Miller, West Palm Bch, for Defendant. *155 MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JU..
18-004997  THE FLORIDA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC. vs CALDER RACE COURSE, INC.; AND DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 2018
The issue in this case is whether Respondent should approve the renewal of a licensee's annual slot machine gaming license, where, according to Petitioner, the licensee's slot machine gaming area is not "contiguous and connected to" its pari-mutuel facility's "live gaming facility" for wagering on horse races—— if a live gaming facility even exists at the track——and therefore fails to conform to statutory requirements.Respondent should deny the renewal of a licensee's slot machine gaming license because its slot machine gaming area is not "contiguous and connected to" its "live gaming facility" and therefore fails to conform to statutory requirements.
17-005872RU  FLORIDA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA NONPROFIT CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 25, 2017
Whether Respondent, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (“Division”), relied on an unadopted rule when it renewed a license to operate slot machines to Intervenor Calder Race Course, Inc. (“Calder”) for the 2017-2018 fiscal year, and whether Petitioner, Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, Inc. (“Petitioner” or “FHBPA”), has standing to bring the instant action.Petitioner failed to establish that the agency's renewal of Intervenor's slot machine license was an unadopted rule.
17-006850PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTEL WAGERING vs CHRISTOS GATIS  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 2017
Whether Respondent violated sections 550.105(4) and (7), Florida Statutes (2016),1/ and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61D-2.005, as applicable, by engaging in the following conduct, as alleged in the First Amended Administrative Complaint: (1) assisting an unlicensed person in working in a restricted area at a licensed pari-mutuel wagering facility, in violation of section 550.105(4) and rule 61D-2.005; and (2) accumulating unpaid obligations directly related to the sport of pari-mutuel racing, in violation of section 550.105(7); and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Agency proved by clear and convincing evidence that licensee committed alleged violations. Recommend fine and supension of license until obligation is paid or licensee enters into agreement to repay obligation and complies with agreement for six months.
17-004870PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs ARECI ROBLEDO  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2017
Whether Respondent raced animals that were impermissibly medicated or determined to have prohibited substances present, resulting in a positive test for such medications or substances in violation of section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2016),1/ as alleged in the administrative complaints; and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent committed seven violations of section 550.2415 by impermissibly medicating or administering prohibited substances to racing greyhounds. Recommend fine and license supension.
17-004871PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs ARECI ROBLEDO  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2017
Whether Respondent raced animals that were impermissibly medicated or determined to have prohibited substances present, resulting in a positive test for such medications or substances in violation of section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2016),1/ as alleged in the administrative complaints; and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent committed seven violations of section 550.2415 by impermissibly medicating or administering prohibited substances to racing greyhounds. Recommend fine and license supension.
17-004872PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs ARECI ROBLEDO  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2017
Whether Respondent raced animals that were impermissibly medicated or determined to have prohibited substances present, resulting in a positive test for such medications or substances in violation of section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2016),1/ as alleged in the administrative complaints; and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent committed seven violations of section 550.2415 by impermissibly medicating or administering prohibited substances to racing greyhounds. Recommend fine and license supension.
17-004873PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs ARECI ROBLEDO  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2017
Whether Respondent raced animals that were impermissibly medicated or determined to have prohibited substances present, resulting in a positive test for such medications or substances in violation of section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2016),1/ as alleged in the administrative complaints; and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent committed seven violations of section 550.2415 by impermissibly medicating or administering prohibited substances to racing greyhounds. Recommend fine and license supension.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer