Leon FL Administrative law, Health care and Litigation Lawye -- eLawyers

07-003511PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ANTHONY BRIGNONI, M.D. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 2007

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsection 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002),1 and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent did not violate standard-of-care when he did not specify the strength of acetic acid to be used in surgery.

06-002014PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MATTHEW WISE, M.D. (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 09, 2006

The first issue in this case for determination is whether Petitioner has jurisdiction over the actions of Respondent, Matthew J. Wise, M.D., alleged in an Administrative Complaint filed with Petitioner on March 14, 2006, in DOH Case No. 2004- 06604, and amended by Order entered July 14, 2006. If the first issue is decided favorably to Petitioner, the second issue for determination is whether Respondent committed the violations of Chapter 458, Florida Statutes, alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against his license to practice medicine in Florida.Respondent approved prescribed medication over the Internet without seeing or talking to the patient, a violation of the standard of care and Rule governing electronic prescriptions.

17-005769 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs REHABILITATION CENTER AT HOLLYWOOD HILLS, LLC (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2017

The issues to be determined in this case are whether Respondent, Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills, LLC ("Hollywood Hills"), violated Florida law as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint filed by the Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA" or "Agency"); and, if so, what sanctions should be imposed.AHCA demonstrated Hollywood Hills commited several Class 1 violations resulting in, or contributing to, the deaths of 9 patients and a mass casualty incident in the aftermath of a loss of A/C from Hurricane Irma. Recommend license revocation.

17-003025RP FLORIDA SOCIETY OF AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTERS, INC.; HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A OAK HILL HOSPITAL; HSS SYSTEMS, LLC, D/B/A PARALLON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE GROUP; AND AUTOMATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2017

The issues to be determined are: whether Petitioners have standing; whether the petition of Automated HealthCare Solutions, Inc. (AHCS), was timely filed1/; and whether Respondent’s proposed rules 69L-31.005(2)(d), 69L-31.016(1), and 69L-31.016(2) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority on the grounds raised by Petitioners.Proposed rule 69L-31.016(1) & (2), and related filing change, are invalid. Resp. must determine if carriers properly disallowed or adjusted payment to providers in reimbursement disputes; no authority to create exceptions for certain disputes.

17-003026RP HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A OAK HILL HOSPITAL AND HSS SYSTEMS, LLC, D/B/A PARALLON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE GROUP vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2017

The issues to be determined are: whether Petitioners have standing; whether the petition of Automated HealthCare Solutions, Inc. (AHCS), was timely filed1/; and whether Respondent’s proposed rules 69L-31.005(2)(d), 69L-31.016(1), and 69L-31.016(2) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority on the grounds raised by Petitioners.Proposed rule 69L-31.016(1) & (2), and related filing change, are invalid. Resp. must determine if carriers properly disallowed or adjusted payment to providers in reimbursement disputes; no authority to create exceptions for certain disputes.

17-003027RP AUTOMATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 23, 2017

The issues to be determined are: whether Petitioners have standing; whether the petition of Automated HealthCare Solutions, Inc. (AHCS), was timely filed1/; and whether Respondent’s proposed rules 69L-31.005(2)(d), 69L-31.016(1), and 69L-31.016(2) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority on the grounds raised by Petitioners.Proposed rule 69L-31.016(1) & (2), and related filing change, are invalid. Resp. must determine if carriers properly disallowed or adjusted payment to providers in reimbursement disputes; no authority to create exceptions for certain disputes.

17-001976RX ORLANDO HEALTH CENTRAL, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 2017

Whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 59C-1.012(2)(a) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority in violation of section 120.52(8) because the rule exceeds the Agency for Health Care Administration’s (“AHCA”) grant of rulemaking authority; Whether rule 59C-1.012(2)(a) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority under section 120.52(8), because the rule enlarges, modifies, or contravenes the law purported to be implemented; and Whether section 408.0455, Florida Statutes, prevents a determination that rule 59C-1.012(2)(a) is invalid.Petitioner did not meet its burden to invalidate rule 59C-1.012(2)(a).

07-001724PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs VASUNDHARA IYENGAR, M.D. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 17, 2007

The issues in this case are whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Physician failed to examine or monitor the patient and assumed the patient (who had been moved to the Intensive Care Unit) had been discharged.

07-003405PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs AARON B. ROUSH, M.D. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 2007

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsection 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2004),2 and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Physician fell below the standard of care when he failed to obtain additional diagnostic testing.

06-004638PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MICHAEL FOX, M.D. (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 15, 2006

Should discipline be imposed against Respondent's license to practice medicine for violation of Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003)?Respondent violated the standard of care by performing a hysterectomy without lab results.

Jennifer Forshey Hinson