The issue is whether Plan Amendment 07-08 adopted by the City of Tampa (City) by Ordinance No. 2008-145 on August 21, 2008, is in compliance.Plan amendment changing land use on two parcels adjacent to MacDill AFB is compatible with safety and noise standards.

Whether the Bay Regional and International Institute of Neurology/Dr. Radhakrishna Rao (Respondent) received Medicaid overpayments that the Agency for Health Care Administration, Office of Inspector General, Bureau of Medicaid Program Integrity (Petitioner), is entitled to recover, and whether a fine should be imposed against Respondent.Petitioner established that Respondent billings to Medicaid resulted in "overpayments."

Are the Medicaid payment claims of Respondent Alternative Care Staffing, Inc. (Alternative), for companion care services authorized by support plans and waiver support coordinators and provided in the community to recipients residing in group homes reimbursable services under the Home and Community-Based Wavier (HCB Waiver) program? Are Alternative’s Medicaid service claims for allegedly unauthorized activities reimbursable under the HCB Waiver program, or may the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) recoup payment for the claims? Did Alternative receive payment for services provided by ineligible staff? Are Alternative’s allegedly overlapping Medicaid service claims actually overlapping? Did the Agency meet: (1) its burden of proof for imposing fines, and (2) its statutory obligations before imposing fines? Whether or how much, due to mitigating factors, the Agency can fine Alternative for the items identified as overpayments in Agency’s Exhibit 6, Amended Final Audit Report dated May 25, 2011; subsequently, modified in Agency’s Exhibit 7, Current Overpayment Calculations and Agency Work Papers; and finally modified during the hearing as shown in Exhibit A to the proposed recommended orders and this Recommended Order.Agency proved provider didn't document experience requirements or appropriateness of services. Agency estopped from disallowing claims for companion services outside licensed home when services included in APD approved plans.

The issue in this case is whether a tax on a warranty deed is an allowable property cost, as claimed in Petitioner’s Medicaid cost report.Petitioner did not prove that doc stamp tax on warranty deed was an allowable property cost, as an ad valorem property tax, on Medicaid cost report.

The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether Angelo's Aggregate Materials, LTD ("Angelo's") is entitled to permits from the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") to construct and operate a Class I landfill in Pasco County.The applicant for construction and operation permits for a Class I landfill failed to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed landfill would meet all applicable permitting criteria.

The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether Angelo's Aggregate Materials, LTD ("Angelo's") is entitled to permits from the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") to construct and operate a Class I landfill in Pasco County.The applicant for construction and operation permits for a Class I landfill failed to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed landfill would meet all applicable permitting criteria.

The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether Angelo's Aggregate Materials, LTD ("Angelo's") is entitled to permits from the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") to construct and operate a Class I landfill in Pasco County.The applicant for construction and operation permits for a Class I landfill failed to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed landfill would meet all applicable permitting criteria.

The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether Angelo's Aggregate Materials, LTD ("Angelo's") is entitled to permits from the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") to construct and operate a Class I landfill in Pasco County.The applicant for construction and operation permits for a Class I landfill failed to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed landfill would meet all applicable permitting criteria.

The issue is whether certain revisions to the City of Venice's (City's) Comprehensive Plan (Plan) adopted by Ordinance No. 2012-15 on August 14, 2012, are in compliance.Petitioner failed to establish that plan amendments were not in compliance or that she was prejudiced by a procedural error during the adoption process.

Whether the FLP is "in compliance" as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2011).1/Volusia County's Farmton Local Plan and remediated amendments to its comprehensive plan should be determined to be "in compliance" under the 2011 Community Planning Act.