Leon FL Administrative law, Litigation and Military law Lawy -- eLawyers

2D09-2634 Lawson v. State (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 19, 2010 Citations: 35 So. 3d 112

35 So. 3d 112 (2010) Mark LAWSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D09-2634. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 19, 2010. Mark Lawson, pro se. NORTHCUTT, Judge. Mark Lawson filed a motion requesting documents contained in the state attorney's file in his case. See § 119.11, Fla. Stat. (2009); Roesch v. State, 633 So. 2d 1 , 2 (Fla.1993) (stating that certain portions of the state attorney's investigation file are public records once a defendant's conviction an..

93-01144 GJV v. State (1994)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 20, 1994 Citations: 637 So. 2d 78

637 So. 2d 78 (1994) G.J.V., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 93-01144. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 20, 1994. James W. O'Neill, Gulfport, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee. DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge. This appeal stems from an amended order to pay restitution entered upon an adjudication of delinquency. We find that the trial court was without statutory autho..

07-003396PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JAMES S. PENDERGRAFT, IV, M.D. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2007

The issues are whether Respondent deviated from the applicable standard of care, failed to keep medical records justifying the course of treatment, improperly delegated professional responsibilities, or prescribed, dispensed or administered controlled substances other than in the course of his professional practice; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved a standard of care violation in failing to order lab tests when starting & during admn of anabolic steroids, a medical records violation for failure to document results of lab tests & prescription outside the course of practice.

08-004197PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JAMES S. PENDERGRAFT, IV, M.D. (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 25, 2008

The issues in this case are whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent's failure to fully advise hospital of events at a clinic prior to emergency transfer and to document events warrants discipline.

06-004288PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JAMES S. PENDERGRAFT, IV, M.D. (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 03, 2006

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsections 456.072(1)(k), 458.331(1)(g), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005),1 and Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2004), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent performed third trimester abortion without certification from two physicians and in a location other than a hospital.

05-003118PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JAMES S. PENDERGRAFT, M.D. (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 2005

The issues in the case are whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.The evidence fails to establish the allegations of the Administrative Complaint. Respondent`s guilty plea in a federal criminal case was based on facts not alleged in the Complaint; accordingly, the Complaint should be dismissed.

03-001952PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs THOMAS PATRICK TREVISANI, M. D. (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 23, 2003

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Section 458.331(1)(m), and/or (1)(t), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.All counts in the Administrative Complaint should be dismissed due to the absence of clear and convincing evidence to prove the alleged violations.

99-001186 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION vs ERNEST ERIC YEGHIAN (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 1999

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.While licensee was guilty of failing to notify Commission of his conviction, he was not (by virtue of conviction of federal crime of bank bribery) guilty of having been convicted of crime involving moral turpitude or fraudulent or dishonest dealing.

93-005403 BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE vs ARTHUR LODATO (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 17, 1993

This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner seeks to take disciplinary action against the Respondent on the basis of charges set forth in a six-count Administrative Complaint which alleges violations of the following statutory provisions: Section 459.013(1)(a), and Section 459.015(1)(i), (n), (p), (q), (r), and (cc), Florida Statutes.Physician violated Section 459.015(1)(r), Florida Statutes by exercising influence on a patient and in advising patient to loan money to physician.

93-005475 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs TEJ PAL SINGH JOWHAL (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 1993

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint which is the subject of DOAH Case No. 93-5475 and the Administrative Complaint which is the subject of DOAH Case 93-5531? If so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him?DOCTOR GUILTY OF VIOLATING TERMS OF PROBATION, SUBSTANDARD CARE INADEQUATE RECORDKEEPING, INAPPROPRIATE PRESCRIBING AND NOT FILLING OUT SCRIPTS PROPERLY

Kenneth J Metzger