Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Kimberly Clark Menchion
Kimberly Clark Menchion
Visitors: 79
0
Bar #425613(FL)     License for 25 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Kimberly Clark Menchion? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 33 U.S.c 40840 U.S.C 747942 U.S.C 201142 U.S.C 202142 U.S.C 213342 U.S.C 460142 U.S.C 4701

CFR: 10 CFR 2014 CFR 7718 CFR 4023 CFR 750.15123 CFR 750.70723 CFR 750.70723 CFR 750.70723 CFR 750.70733 CFR 20833 CFR 38533 CFR 385.2033 CFR 385.2033 CFR 385.2033 CFR 385.2633 CFR 385.2633 CFR 385.2640 CFR 122.2640 CFR 122.2640 CFR 122.2640 CFR 14140 CFR 144.3940 CFR 144.3940 CFR 144.3940 CFR 144.4040 CFR 144.4040 CFR 144.4040 CFR 144.4140 CFR 30 240 CFR 4040 CFR 50.240 CFR 50.240 CFR 50.240 CFR 5140 CFR 6040 CFR 60.1140 CFR 60.1240 CFR 60.1340 CFR 60.13040 CFR 60.1940 CFR 60.421140 CFR 60.421440 CFR 60.424540 CFR 60.432040 CFR 60.442040 CFR 60.4840 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.840 CFR 6340 CFR 63.659040 CFR 63.659040 CFR 63.659040 CFR 6840 CFR 7240 CFR 7549 CFR 2449 CFR 24.20749 CFR 24.20749 CFR 24.20749 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.404

Florida Laws: 10.1110.1511.45120.52120.536120.54120.56120.569120.57120.60120.68120.69122.26163.3164163.3180163.3194163.320917.00117.00220.331252.34253.02253.115253.75253.77258.397267.061290.002334.01334.03334.044335.182335.188337.11337.14337.16337.18337.401337.402337.403337.404339.05339.09339.2819361.01366.02366.03366.04366.041366.05366.051366.055366.80366.92366.93373.016373.019373.042373.0421373.044373.085373.086373.089373.103373.113373.129373.1391373.1501373.1502373.219373.223373.229373.246373.308373.309373.316373.319373.342373.403373.413373.4135373.4136373.414373.4145373.416373.421373.4211373.428373.429373.4592373.603376.301377.601379.1025379.2291379.2431380.04380.06380.23403.031403.061403.067403.087403.0872403.088403.0885403.111403.121403.131403.141403.151403.161403.501403.502403.503403.504403.506403.5064403.5065403.5066403.50665403.507403.508403.509403.510403.511403.5112403.5113403.5115403.512403.514403.515403.516403.5175403.518403.5185403.519403.522403.526403.527403.5271403.531403.5315403.5317403.722403.73403.814403.859403.861403.9404403.941403.9411403.9416403.9418403.9419421.55479.01479.015479.02479.04479.07479.08479.10479.105479.106479.107479.11479.111479.15479.155479.156479.1648.2048.21487.031487.041489.129489.142557.1116.057.017.0270.00170.20713.0179.01872.0290.202

Florida Administrative Code: 14-10.00414-10.004214-10.00614-10.00714-22.01214-22.014114-60.00914-66.00718-18.00418-18.00618-2.01818-21.00318-21.005125-6.034225-6.034528-106.20128-106.21740D-4.09140D-4.30140E-2.09140E-2.10140E-2.30140E-2.38140E-20.30240E-3.04140E-3.10140E-3.30140E-3.46140E-4.09140E-4.30240E-6.01140E-6.04140E-6.22140E-6.31140E-6.35162 -520.60062 -701.51062-110.10662-160.11062-160.30062-160.34062-17.13362-17.19162-17.20562-17.21162-17.28162-17.66062-204.80062-210.20062-210.30062-210.37062-210.65062-210.70062-212.30062-212.40062-296.32062-296.47062-297.10062-297.31062-297.52062-297.62062-341.62062-343.07062-343.09062-343.90062-345.10062-345.40062-345.50062-345.90062-4.02062-4.02162-4.03062-4.07062-4.08062-4.11062-4.12062-4.13062-4.16062-4.22062-4.24262-520.31062-520.40062-520.41062-520.42062-520.60062-520.90062-532.50062-555.31062-621.30062-672.87062-701.30062-701.51062-701.63062-701.90062-730.22562-730.30062-807.61068A-16.00168A-16.00268A-9.002

08-005352  SHIVER PROPERTIES vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 23, 2008
The issue is whether Petitioner is maintaining signs illegally as alleged in a Notice of Violation issued to Petitioner.Illegally erected signs visible, if not legible, from U.S.1 in Dade County with ads for businesses in Monroe County, were not shown to be exempt from permit requirements, were nuisance and ordered removed.
08-002778  PROCTER PRODUCTIONS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 12, 2008
The issue is whether Respondent should deny Petitioner's application for a sign permit, because the proposed site is not zoned commercial and, therefore, fails the requirement for commercial zoning in Subsection 479.111(2), Florida Statutes (2007),1 and the location does not qualify as an un-zoned commercial/industrial area within the meaning of Subsection 479.01(23).Respondent should grant a permit for the sign to be located on property that is commercial-zoned within the meaning of Subsection 479.111(2), Florida Statutes.
08-000660  LAMAR OF TALLAHASSEE vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2008
The issues in this case are whether the Department of Transportation properly issued a Notice of Violation for an illegally erected sign to Lamar of Tallahassee and whether the Petitioner's applications for a sign maintained at the corner of SR366/West Pensacola Street and Ocala Road, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, should be granted as a non-conforming sign or because the Department did not act on either the 2005 or 2007 application for the same sign in a timely manner.The evidence showed that sign did not qualify as nonconforming sign since had not existed for seven years. Recommended Order provides a discussion of deemer provisions in Section 120.60(1), Florida Statutes.
08-000661  LAMAR OF TALLAHASSEE vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2008
The issues in this case are whether the Department of Transportation properly issued a Notice of Violation for an illegally erected sign to Lamar of Tallahassee and whether the Petitioner's applications for a sign maintained at the corner of SR366/West Pensacola Street and Ocala Road, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, should be granted as a non-conforming sign or because the Department did not act on either the 2005 or 2007 application for the same sign in a timely manner.The evidence showed that sign did not qualify as nonconforming sign since had not existed for seven years. Recommended Order provides a discussion of deemer provisions in Section 120.60(1), Florida Statutes.
08-001604  AFFORDABLE RESTAURANT EQUIPMENTS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 01, 2008
The issue in the case is whether Affordable Restaurant Equipments, Inc. (Petitioner), is entitled to receive $209,720 from the Department of Transportation (DOT) as additional reimbursement for property storage expenses. Petitioner not entitled to reimbursement for storage fees beyond 12 months.
07-004547  SOUTHERN GEAR COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 03, 2007
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether reimbursement should be paid to the Petitioner for storage expenses for personal property, under the Florida Uniform Relocation Assistance Program and, if so, the amount of such reimbursement.Petitioner showed that storage expense for inventory and equipment was reasonable and necessary for period in excess of normal 12-month period provided in the statute and rule after loss of the business site due to eminent domain.
03-002420PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs EDWARD MIDGETT  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 01, 2003
The issue is whether Respondent violated Subsections 489.129(1)(g), (i), (j), and (m), Florida Statutes (2001), by allegedly engaging in financial mismanagement, abandoning a construction project, engaging in misconduct or being incompetent, and failing to disclose the rights of the consumer in a contract. (Statutory references are to Florida Statutes (2001).)Recommended that contractor, who took $70,000, did not build the house, and did not return the money, have his license revoked, pay restitution, costs, and be fined $5,000.
02-004820PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs ROBERT MENSCHING  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 2002
Did Respondent violate Section 489.129(1)(h), Florida Statutes, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed?Having violated Section 489.129(1)(h), Florida Statutes, Respondent`s license is subject to discipline by the Construction Industry Licensing Board.
03-001224PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs RALPH N. BATTAGLIA  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 03, 2003
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Ralph Battaglia, committed the offenses alleged in an Administrative Complaint issued by Petitioner, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, and dated August 9, 2002, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Respondent failed to pay subcontractor, causing liens to be placed on customer`s property.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer