17 F.3d 329 73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 94-1569 , 94-1 USTC P 50,145, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 17741A Susan A. MALLOY, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim Defendant, John E. Malloy, Jr., Defendant-Counter-Claim Plaintiff-Appellant, Moralmar Kitchen Cabinets, et al., Defendants-Counter-Claim Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Counter-Claim Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 92-4984. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 24, 1994. Larry V. Bishins, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Stephen R. Gladstone, Boca R..

214 U.S. 501 (1909) Ex parte ISAAC HELLER, PETITIONER. No. _, Original. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted April 27, 1909. Decided May 3, 1909. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. *502 Mr. Abraham A. Berman for petitioner. Mr. Arthur v. Briesen submitted a brief for the respondent. Per Curiam: Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of mandamus denied.

975 F. Supp. 1349 (1997) Mercy PRADO, Plaintiff, v. L. LURIA & SON, INC., Defendant. No. 95-2263-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 14, 1997. *1350 *1351 Andrew B. Peretz, Duker, Barrett & Gravante, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Juan Pablo Gonzales-Sirgo, Coral Gables, FL, for Plaintiff. Robert Louis Norton, Peter Louis Sampo, Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., Coral Gables, FL, for Defendant. CORRECTED ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FERGUSON, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Cou..

944 So. 2d 998 (2007) REX DISCOUNT, INC. v. SALIM'S FOOD CATERING TRUCKS, INC. No. 3D06-2176. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 11, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Volume dismissed.

Whether the Petitioner owes sales and use tax (plus interest and penalties) for charges made to its catering customers for the labor of waiters serving complete meals before December 7, 1987.Taxpayer's argument that sales tax not due on charge for waiter services provided in connection with catering of full dinners or bar-b-qs rejected.

Recommend granting license to Petitioner who took precautions not to be referred to as a vet until licensed and who did not forge documents.

In an administrative complaint entitled "Second Amended Notice to Show Cause" the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering ("Division" or "Petitioner") has charged Charles R. Federman ("Respondent") with violation of Rule 7E- 4.25(12)(a), Florida Administrative Code which provides: The running of a horse in a race with any narcotic, stimulant, depressant or local anesthetic is prohibited. If the stewards shall find that any narcotic, stimulant, depressant or local anesthetic has been administered or attempted to be administered, internally or externally, to a horse before a race, such stewards shall impose such punishment and take such other action as they may deem proper under any of the rules, including reference to the Division, against every person found by them to have administered, or to have caused to be administered, or to have caused an attempt to administer, or to leave conspired with another person to administer such narcotic, stimulant, depressant or local anesthetic. If the Division laboratory shall find a positive identification of any such medication, such finding shall constitute prima facie evidence that such horse raced with the medication in its system. The Second Amended Notice to Show Cause alleges that Respondent is in violation of the above-cited rule by virtue of the provisions of Rule 7E-4.05(3), Florida Administrative Code, which reads: The trainer shall be responsible for and be the insuror of the condition of the horses he enters. Trainers are presumed to know the rules of the Division. The Second Amended Notice to Show Cause also charges Respondent with an alleged violation of Rule 7E-4.25(13), Florida Administrative Code, which provides: The trainer, groom, and any other person having charge, custody, or care of the horse, are obligated properly to protect the horse and guard it against such administration or attempted administration and if the stewards shall find that any such person has failed to show proper protection and guarding of the horse, they shall impose such punishment and take such other action as they may deem proper under any of the rules, including reference to the Division. The Second Amended Notice to Show Cause alleges that Respondent was the trainer of a horse which, on November 28, 1979 raced in and won the ninth race at Pompano Park where Tourist Attractions, Inc. is licensed by the State of Florida to conduct harness horse racing. It is Further alleged that a urine specimen taken from the horse at the conclusion of the race was, upon analysis, found to contain the drug "butorphanol", which is alleged to be a "narcotic" and, in a horse, either a "depressant" or "stimulant". Respondent Federman is charged by the Division with responsibility for the racing of a drugged horse as the insuror of the horse's condition, and further charged with failure to properly protect and guard the horse from administration of the drug.Revoke Respondent`s license for allowing a Standardbred to race under the influence of narcotics.

Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, William E. Williams, held a public hearing in this case on July 24, 1980, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. APPEARANCES For Petitioner: Larry V. Bishins, Esquire 4548 North Federal Highway Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308Challenged rules valid except for the imposition of monetary fines.

Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, William E. Williams, held a public hearing in this cause on September 10, 1980, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. APPEARANCES For Petitioner: Larry V. Bishins, Esquire 4548 North Federal Highway Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308 and Arnold Laksy, Esquire 3510 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 316Resp.'s attempt to have the rules declared invalid failed except as to the imposition of monetary fines which aren't authorized by stat.