Leon FL Lawyers | Linda Barge-Miles -- eLawyers

Linda Barge-Miles

Visitors: 43

Bar #794260(FL) License for 35 years; Member in Good Standing

Tallahassee FL

Are you Linda Barge-Miles? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.57, 393.0655, 435.04, 435.07, 741.28, 741.30, 784.03

03-003838 BABU JAIN vs FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 20, 2003

Whether Petitioner’s employment with Respondent terminated on May 31, 2003, or whether Petitioner continued to be employed by Respondent during the next calendar month.All employment relationships did not terminate within the meaning of Subsection 121.021 (39), Florida Statutes. University`s actions were unilateral. Recommend reinstatement.

03-004284 DONALD ALLEN vs FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 18, 2003

The issue is whether Petitioner should be dismissed from his employment as a tenured professor at Florida A & M University as proposed in a termination letter dated October 17, 2003, on the grounds that he violated Rules 6C3-10.103 and 6C3-10.230, Florida Administrative Code.Petitioner violated Rules 6C3-10.103(6)(b) and 6C3-10.230, Florida Administrative Code, by engaging in quid pro quo sexual harassment of one of his students, which further amounted to misconduct as a professor. Recommend Petitioner`s dismissal.

02-001417 JAMES JONES, JR. | J. J., SR. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 10, 2002

The issue in this proceeding is whether Petitioner's request for an exemption from disqualification from employment in a position of trust or responsibility should be granted.Examination or Section 435.07, Florida Statutes, and its predecessor, Section 393.0655, Florida Statutes, reveals Petitioner did not commit disqualifying offense. Recommend grant exemption from disqualification.

98-004706RU FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 79, AFSCME, BETTY HALL, DIANE LOMAS, SARA BATTISTA, MERCEDES VALDEZ, ELIZABETH JUDD, AND KENNETH SHOLSTRUM vs DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 1998

This is a rule challenge proceeding pursuant to Section 120.56(4), Florida Statutes, in which the Petitioners and the Intervenor assert that they are substantially affected by an agency statement that violates Section 120.54(1)(a), Florida Statutes. The subject matter at issue here concerns the method of determining the order of layoff of some of the Respondent's employees.Agency choice of layoff method to be used only once was not a "rule."

91-001656RX DONALD EUGENE HALPIN AND RICHARD EDWARD JACKSON vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 18, 1991

Whether Rules 33ER91-1 and 33ER91-2, Florida Administrative Code, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated authority?Failed to prove emergency rules governing custody classification invalid. One emergency rule invalid because of 120.54(9)(c)

91-002292RP WILLIAM VAN POYCK vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 15, 1991

Whether a proposed amendment to Rule 33-3.0081, Florida Administrative Code, constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated authority?Petitioner failed to prove that proposed amendments to Department of Corrections Rules were invalid. Rules govern administrative confinement.

91-005184RX JIMMY COLEMAN vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 13, 1991

Whether Rule 33-11.0065(5)(a), Florida Administrative Code, constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated authority?Failed to prove rule providing for loss of gain time while inmate is on escape status is invalid.

91-003203RU RICHARD CHARLES GASTON vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 1991

The issue for consideration in this matter is whether the Inter-Office Memo dated April 9, 1991, from Wilson C. Bell, Assistant Secretary, providing for changes to the Transition Assistance Act, to be effective May 1, 1991, constituted an unpromulgated rule and an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Memo by assistant secretary of agency which has agency-wide application and affects an agency program is an unpromulgated rule and invalid if not properly adopted.

91-002038RX DANIEL L. HERRICK vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 1991

Whether Rule 33-3.012, Florida Administrative Code, constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated authority?Failed to prove rule governing inmate reading list invalid.

90-004259 DONNA ANN JENNINGS vs MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 06, 1990

The issues for determination are whether Petitioner's substantial interest was affected by Respondent's denial of Petitioner's application for licensure by examination; and, whether Respondent's denial conformed with applicable time limits in Section 120.60(2), Florida Statutes, requiring that agency action denying license applications be taken with 90 days of receipt of the application.Respondent did not deny application within 90 days of receipt. Accordingly, petitioner whould be admitted to examination.