Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Louis A Trombetta
Louis A Trombetta
Visitors: 87
0
Bar #108119(FL)     License for 12 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Louis A Trombetta? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-004997  THE FLORIDA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC. vs CALDER RACE COURSE, INC.; AND DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 2018
The issue in this case is whether Respondent should approve the renewal of a licensee's annual slot machine gaming license, where, according to Petitioner, the licensee's slot machine gaming area is not "contiguous and connected to" its pari-mutuel facility's "live gaming facility" for wagering on horse races—— if a live gaming facility even exists at the track——and therefore fails to conform to statutory requirements.Respondent should deny the renewal of a licensee's slot machine gaming license because its slot machine gaming area is not "contiguous and connected to" its "live gaming facility" and therefore fails to conform to statutory requirements.
14-000898PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs JAMES E. O'DONNELL  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 24, 2014
Whether Respondent failed to keep proof of vaccination on file for racing greyhounds in his kennel, had a hypodermic needle on premises where racing greyhounds were lodged or kept, or stored cleaning supplies in the same area as bedding intended for racing greyhounds, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Respondent failed to keep proof of vaccination for racing greyhounds and had hypodermic needles in prohibited areas, and a file of $76,000 is recommended.
14-000907PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs JAMES E. O'DONNELL  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 25, 2014
Whether Respondent failed to keep proof of vaccination on file for racing greyhounds in his kennel, had a hypodermic needle on premises where racing greyhounds were lodged or kept, or stored cleaning supplies in the same area as bedding intended for racing greyhounds, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Respondent failed to keep proof of vaccination for racing greyhounds and had hypodermic needles in prohibited areas, and a file of $76,000 is recommended.
18-000915RP  PALM BEACH GREYHOUND KENNEL ASSOCIATION vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2018
The issue for disposition in this case is whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rule 61D-6.0052 (Proposed Rule) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes.Petitioner proved that several provisions of proposed rule 61D-6.0052 were invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority. The rule is otherwise valid.
17-005882RX  THE FLORIDA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 25, 2017
The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 61D-6.011 is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, in violation of section 120.52(8).Department's drug classification and penalty rule is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as described in section 120.52(8)(b) & (c), but is not arbitrary and capricious as described in section 120.52(8)(e).
17-005238RU  CHARLES F. MCCLELLAN AND NATASHA NEMETH vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 21, 2017
Whether Florida Administrative Code Rules 61D-6.007 and/or 61D-6.012 constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Florida Administrative Code Rules 61D-6.007 and 61D-6.012 are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.
17-005872RU  FLORIDA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA NONPROFIT CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 25, 2017
Whether Respondent, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (“Division”), relied on an unadopted rule when it renewed a license to operate slot machines to Intervenor Calder Race Course, Inc. (“Calder”) for the 2017-2018 fiscal year, and whether Petitioner, Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, Inc. (“Petitioner” or “FHBPA”), has standing to bring the instant action.Petitioner failed to establish that the agency's renewal of Intervenor's slot machine license was an unadopted rule.
15-007013RP  MELBOURNE GREYHOUND PARK, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007014RP  BONITA-FORT MYERS CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007015RP  INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF PALM BEACH vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer